World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 57 3979 3668 2231 2009 137 16771

Phillip K. Wood publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Phillip K. Wood between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Phillip K. Wood published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2025. 14 of the 161 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2025. 1983: 3 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 5 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 11 publications
1983 2025

161 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Phillip K. Wood: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 3
1984 2
1985 0
1986 1
1987 1
1988 0
1989 1
1990 3
1991 1
1992 2
1993 2
1994 4
1995 3
1996 6
1997 5
1998 4
1999 0
2000 2
2001 1
2002 3
2003 5
2004 2
2005 1
2006 2
2007 2
2008 4
2009 7
2010 7
2011 5
2012 9
2013 8
2014 7
2015 5
2016 4
2017 8
2018 2
2019 4
2020 5
2021 10
2022 1
2023 5
2024 3
2025 11
Total 161
Download as CSV

Phillip K. Wood publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phillip K. Wood sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 137 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 137
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Phillip K. Wood D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phillip K. Wood sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 57
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Phillip K. Wood is affiliated with the University of Missouri in the United States and works primarily within the field of psychology. Their research spans several interconnected subfields, including experimental and cognitive psychology, statistics and probability, epidemiology, applied psychology, and clinical psychology.

The main focus of Wood's scholarly work includes exploring mental health research topics, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, behavioral health and interventions, gambling behavior and treatments, statistical methods and Bayesian inference, cognitive abilities and testing, as well as advanced causal inference techniques.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Wood cover a range of subjects related to psychopathology, substance use, and psychological methodology:

  • "Time to get personal? The impact of researchers choices on the selection of treatment targets using the experience sampling methodology," 2020, Journal of Psychosomatic Research
  • "How Robust Is the p Factor? Using Multitrait-Multimethod Modeling to Inform the Meaning of General Factors of Youth Psychopathology," 2021, Clinical Psychological Science
  • "Incipient alcohol use in childhood: Early alcohol sipping and its relations with psychopathology and personality," 2020, Development and Psychopathology
  • "How robust is the p-factor? Using multitrait-multimethod modeling to inform the meaning of general factors of psychopathology in youth," 2021, Arabixiv (OSF Preprints)
  • "Not all symptoms of alcohol dependence are developmentally equivalent: Implications for the false-positives problem," 2021, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Wood frequently publishes in journals that focus on developmental and clinical psychological science. Their frequent publication venues are:

  • Development and Psychopathology
  • Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal
  • Journal of Data Science
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research
  • Arabixiv (OSF Preprints)

Collaborations are a significant part of Wood's research output, working often with several coauthors. The notable frequent co-authors include:

  • Ashley L. Watts
  • Kenneth J. Sher
  • Timothy J. Trull
  • Douglas Steinley

Wood's research integrates statistical modeling, developmental psychology, and clinical outcomes to address complex questions related to youth psychopathology, alcohol use and dependence, and treatment efficacy. Their work often employs multitrait-multimethod methodologies to clarify latent constructs in psychopathology research.

Best Publications

  • Surveying the damage: a review of research on consequences of alcohol misuse in college populations.

    H Wesley Perkins

  • Characteristics of children of alcoholics: putative risk factors, substance use and abuse, and psychopathology.

    Kenneth J. Sher;Kimberly S. Walitzer;Phillip K. Wood;Edward E. Brent

  • Revised NESARC personality disorder diagnoses: gender, prevalence, and comorbidity with substance dependence disorders.

    Timothy J. Trull;Seungmin Jahng;Rachel L. Tomko;Phillip K. Wood

  • Male Gender Role Conflict, Depression, and Help Seeking: Do College Men Face Double Jeopardy?

    Glenn E. Good;Phillip K. Wood

  • Analysis of Affective Instability in Ecological Momentary Assessment: Indices Using Successive Difference and Group Comparison via Multilevel Modeling.

    Seungmin Jahng;Phillip K. Wood;Timothy J. Trull

  • Personality and the predisposition to engage in risky or problem behaviors during adolescence.

    M Lynne Cooper;Phillip K Wood;Holly K Orcutt;Austin Albino

  • Affective instability: measuring a core feature of borderline personality disorder with ecological momentary assessment.

    Timothy J. Trull;Marika B. Solhan;Sarah L. Tragesser;Seungmin Jahng

  • Characteristics of borderline personality disorder in a community sample: comorbidity, treatment utilization, and general functioning.

    Rachel L. Tomko;Timothy J. Trull;Phillip K. Wood;Kenneth J. Sher

  • Clinical assessment of affective instability: comparing EMA indices, questionnaire reports, and retrospective recall.

    Marika B. Solhan;Timothy J. Trull;Seungmin Jahng;Phillip K. Wood

  • Blue-Collar Scholars?: Mediators and Moderators of University Attrition in First-Generation College Students.

    Julia A. Martinez;Kenneth J. Sher;Jennifer L. Krull;Phillip K. Wood

  • Alcohol Outcome Expectancies and Alcohol Use: A Latent Variable Cross-Lagged Panel Study

    Kenneth J. Sher;Mark D. Wood;Phillip K. Wood;Gail Raskin

  • Two separate verbal processing rates contributing to short-term memory span.

    Nelson Cowan;Noelle L. Wood;Phillip K. Wood;Timothy A. Keller

  • Is “Maturing out” of Problematic Alcohol Involvement Related to Personality Change?

    Andrew K. Littlefield;Kenneth J. Sher;Phillip K. Wood

  • Critical Thinking among College and Graduate Students.

    Patricia M. King;Phillip K. Wood;Robert A. Mines

  • Adolescent alcohol and tobacco use: onset, persistence and trajectories of use across two samples

    Kristina M. Jackson;Kenneth J. Sher;M. Lynne Cooper;Phillip K. Wood

  • Inquiring Systems and Problem Structure: Implications for Cognitive Development

    Phillip Karl Wood

  • Developmental range of reflective judgment: The effect of contextual support and practice on developmental stage.

    Karen Strohm Kitchener;Cindy L. Lynch;Kurt W Fischer;Phillip K. Wood

  • Anxiety and Drinking Behavior: Moderating Effects of Tension‐Reduction Alcohol Outcome Expectancies

    Matt G. Kushner;Kenneth J. Sher;Mark D. Wood;Phillip K. Wood

  • Transitioning into and out of large-effect drinking in young adulthood.

    Kristina M. Jackson;Kenneth J. Sher;Heather J. Gotham;Phillip K. Wood

  • Do Changes in Drinking Motives Mediate the Relation between Personality Change and “Maturing Out” of Problem Drinking?

    Andrew K. Littlefield;Kenneth J. Sher;Phillip K. Wood

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth J. Sher
Kenneth J. Sher University of Missouri
Timothy J. Trull
Timothy J. Trull University of Missouri
Kristina M. Jackson
Kristina M. Jackson Brown University
Thomas M. Piasecki
Thomas M. Piasecki University of Wisconsin–Madison
Andrew K. Littlefield
Andrew K. Littlefield Texas Tech University
Bruce D. Bartholow
Bruce D. Bartholow University of Missouri
Saul Shiffman
Saul Shiffman University of Pittsburgh
Wendy S. Slutske
Wendy S. Slutske University of Missouri
Andrew C. Heath
Andrew C. Heath Washington University in St. Louis
Kathleen K. Bucholz
Kathleen K. Bucholz Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens the door to a variety of rewarding career opportunities—many of which overlap with fields like social work and counseling. As demand grows for professionals skilled in offering mental health support and social services, students are increasingly turning to flexible online programs to earn their credentials.

When considering your options, it’s valuable to research programs that offer a strong return on investment and recognized accreditation. For example, those near the East Coast may want to look into the best value online social work degrees in Maryland. If you reside in the Midwest, there are many reputable programs listed among the best value online social work degrees in the Midwest.

For those based in the West, the best value online social work degrees in Nevada offer unique opportunities in culturally diverse communities. In Ohio and neighboring states, you can discover the most valuable online social work programs in Ohio designed to prepare graduates for impactful careers.

Combining a Psychology background with a social work qualification can expand your career pathways and equip you for leadership in helping professions.

Best Scientists Citing Phillip K. Wood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles