World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
9824
World Ranking
7160
National Ranking
482

John Hunsley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Hunsley sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John Hunsley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Hunsley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John Hunsley is affiliated with the University of Ottawa in Canada. Their research spans multiple fields within psychology and medicine, with a focus on clinical psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, and applied psychology.

The main topics of their work include psychological testing and assessment, personality disorders and psychopathology, psychotherapy techniques and applications, innovations in medical education, and medical education and admissions.

Hunsley's recent publications include the following papers:

  • Legal Admissibility of the Rorschach and R-PAS: A Review of Research, Practice, and Case Law (2022), published in the Journal of Personality Assessment
  • Appropriate validation standards for licensure examinations: Comment on Callahan et al. (2020) (2021), published in American Psychologist

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Donald J. Viglione
  • Corine de Ruiter
  • Christopher King
  • Gregory J. Meyer
  • Aaron J. Kivisto

Hunsley's work has appeared in several publication venues, notably:

  • Journal of Personality Assessment
  • American Psychologist

Best Publications

  • The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues.

    John Hunsley;Gregory J. Meyer

  • Emotionally Focused Couples Therapy: Status and Challenges

    Susan M. Johnson;John Hunsley;Leslie Greenberg;Dwavne Schindler

  • Evidence-Based Assessment

    John Hunsley;Eric J. Mash

  • Evidence-Based Assessment of Child and Adolescent Disorders: Issues and Challenges

    Eric J. Mash;John Hunsley

  • MMPI, Rorschach, and WAIS: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Reliability, Stability, and Validity

    Kevin C. H. Parker;R. Karl Hanson;John Hunsley

  • Toward a Model of Environmental Activism

    Chantal SGuin;Luc G. Pelletier;John Hunsley

  • Assessment of child and family disturbance: A developmental-systems approach.

    Eric J. Mash;John Hunsley

  • A Guide to Assessments That Work

    John Hunsley;Eric J. Mash

  • The Seven-Item Short Form of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Further Evidence for Construct Validity

    John Hunsley;Marlene Best;Monique Lefebvre;Diana Vito

  • Interpersonal and family functioning of female survivors of childhood sexual abuse

    Orly Rumstein-McKean;John Hunsley

  • The clinical utility of the Rorschach: Unfulfilled promises and an uncertain future

    John Hunsley;J. Michael Bailey

  • Research-informed benchmarks for psychological treatments: Efficacy studies, effectiveness studies, and beyond.

    John Hunsley;Catherine M. Lee

  • Psychosocial distress and well-being among gay and bisexual men with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

    Chuang Ht;Devins Gm;Hunsley J;Gill Mj

  • Comparing therapist and client perspectives on reasons for psychotherapy termination.

    John Hunsley;Tim D. Aubry;Christine M. Verstervelt;Diana Vito

  • Utilization of mental health care services among older adults with depression

    Rebecca Crabb;John Hunsley

  • Construct Validity of the Short Forms of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale

    John Hunsley;Celine Pinsent;Monique Lefebvre;Susan James-Tanner

  • Assessment of anxiety in older adults: A systematic review of commonly used measures

    Zoé Therrien;John Hunsley

  • Scientific Foundations of Clinical Assessment

    Stephen N. Haynes;Gregory T. Smith;John D. Hunsley

  • Evidence-Based Assessment as an Integrative Model for Applying Psychological Science to Guide the Voyage of Treatment

    Eric A. Youngstrom;Anna Van Meter;Thomas W Frazier;John Hunsley

  • Controversial and questionable assessment techniques.

    John Hunsley;Catherine M. Lee;James M. Wood

  • Cognitive processes in mathematics anxiety and test anxiety: The role of appraisals, internal dialogue, and attributions.

    John Hunsley

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric J. Mash
Eric J. Mash University of Calgary
Luc G. Pelletier
Luc G. Pelletier University of Ottawa
Giorgio A. Tasca
Giorgio A. Tasca University of Ottawa
Keith S. Dobson
Keith S. Dobson University of Calgary
J. Michael Bailey
J. Michael Bailey Northwestern University
Anthony S. Joyce
Anthony S. Joyce University of Alberta
Lynne Angus
Lynne Angus York University
Gregory J. Meyer
Gregory J. Meyer University of Toledo
Susan M. Johnson
Susan M. Johnson University of Ottawa
Michael Gill
Michael Gill Trinity College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology can open the door to a variety of career paths, including counseling, research, human resources, and mental health services. In addition to flexibility, online programs often provide access to high-quality education at a more affordable rate. Cost is a major consideration for many students looking to further their careers in psychology.

Fortunately, many institutions across the U.S. offer programs that combine academic excellence with affordability. For those interested in studying in the Midwest, you can find most affordable psychology degree programs in Minneapolis. In Missouri, students have access to several affordable psychology programs in Missouri, providing flexible learning options.

Moving east, the most affordable psychology degree programs in North Carolina deliver diverse course offerings for students in the Southeast. If pursuing your studies in a metropolitan area is a priority, consider the most affordable psychology degree programs in New York City. Comparing these programs can help you identify the right fit for your academic and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing John Hunsley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles