World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lynne Angus

Lynne Angus

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
4688
World Ranking
9599
National Ranking
664

Lynne Angus publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynne Angus sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 114 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lynne Angus D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynne Angus sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lynne Angus is affiliated with York University in Canada and has a research focus primarily in the field of Psychology, with a significant emphasis on Clinical Psychology. Their body of work includes 31 publications broadly categorized under Psychology, with notable contributions also in Social Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

Their research topics predominantly cover Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics, Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications, Counseling Practices and Supervision, Language, Discourse, and Communication Strategies, Personality Disorders and Psychopathology, Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy, and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics.

Frequent coauthors in their work include:

  • Peter Muntigl
  • Lynda Chubak
  • Ana Aleixo
  • António Pires
  • Alexandre Vaz

Lynne Angus has published repeatedly in several journals, with multiple contributions in Psychotherapy Research, Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, and PsycTHERAPY Dataset. Other publication venues include Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy.

Selected recent papers illustrate the scope and focus of their research:

  • "Getting to 'Yes': Overcoming Client Reluctance to Engage in Chair Work" (2020), published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • "A Review of Empirical Studies Investigating Narrative, Emotion and Meaning-Making Modes and Client Process Markers in Psychotherapy" (2020), Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy
  • "Responding to In-the-Moment Distress in Emotion-Focused Therapy" (2023), Research on Language and Social Interaction
  • "Double trouble: Therapists with low facilitative interpersonal skills and without training have low in-session experiential processes" (2021), Psychotherapy Research
  • "The weaving of therapist responses with client storytelling to promote narrative and emotional integration of complex trauma" (2024), Journal of Psychotherapy Integration

Best Publications

  • The handbook of narrative and psychotherapy: Practice, theory, and research.

    Lynne E. Angus;John McLeod

  • The narrative processes coding system: research applications and implications for psychotherapy practice.

    Lynne Angus;Heidi Levitt;Karen Hardtke

  • A metaphor analysis in treatments of depression: Metaphor as a marker of change

    Heidi Levitt;Yifaht Korman;Lynne Angus

  • The effects of adding emotion-focused interventions to the client-centered relationship conditions in the treatment of depression

    Rhonda N. Goldman;Leslie S. Greenberg;Lynne Angus

  • Humanistic psychotherapy research 1990–2015: From methodological innovation to evidence-supported treatment outcomes and beyond

    Lynne Angus;Jeanne Cherry Watson;Robert Elliott;Kirk Schneider

  • Narrative change in emotion-focused therapy: how is change constructed through the lens of the innovative moments coding system?

    Inês Mendes;António P. Ribeiro;Lynne Angus;Leslie S. Greenberg

  • Therapist participation in metaphor generation: Collaborative and noncollaborative styles.

    Lynne E. Angus;David L. Rennie

  • Narrative processes in psychotherapy.

    Lynne Angus;Karen Hardtke

  • Innovative Moments and Change in Emotion-Focused Therapy: The Case of Lisa

    Miguel M. Gonçalves;Inês Mendes;António P. Ribeiro;Lynne E. Angus

  • Innovative moments and change in client-centered therapy

    Miguel M. Gonçalves;Inês Mendes;Graciete Cruz;António P. Ribeiro

  • Effects of psychological therapies in randomized trials and practice-based studies.

    Michael Barkham;William B. Stiles;Janice Connell;Elspeth Twigg

  • Constructing psychopathology from a cognitive narrative perspective.

    Óscar F. Gonçalves;Yifaht Korman;Lynne Angus

  • Envisioning the representational world: The client's experience of metaphoric expression in psychotherapy.

    Lynne E. Angus;David L. Rennie

  • Folk Psychology and Narrative Practice

    Lynne Angus;John McLeod

  • The Impact of Motivational Interviewing on Client Experiences of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder.

    Angela Kertes;Henny A. Westra;Lynne Angus;Madalyn Marcus

  • Maintenance of Gains Following Experiential Therapies for Depression.

    Jennifer A. Ellison;Leslie S. Greenberg;Rhonda N. Goldman;Lynne Angus

  • EMPATHIC RELATIONAL BONDS AND PERSONAL AGENCY IN PSYCHOTHERAPY: IMPLICATIONS FOR PSYCHOTHERAPY SUPERVISION, PRACTICE, AND RESEARCH

    Lynne Angus;Fern Kagan

  • Assessing silent processes in psychotherapy: an empirically derived categorization system and sampling strategy

    Ze'ev Frankel;Heidi M. Levitt;David M. Murray;Leslie S. Greenberg

  • The Contributions of Emotion Processes to Narrative Change in Psychotherapy: A Dialectical Constructivist Approach.

    Leslie S. Greenberg;Lynne E. Angus

  • Metaphor in psychodynamic psychotherapy with borderline and non-borderline clients: A qualitative analysis.

    Brian Rasmussen;Lynne Angus

  • Therapy was not what I expected: A preliminary qualitative analysis of concordance between client expectations and experience of cognitive–behavioural therapy

    Henny Alice Westra;Adi Aviram;Marissa Barnes;Lynne Angus

  • Qualitative Research on Clients' Assimilation of Problematic Experiences in Psychotherapy

    William B. Stiles;lynne Angus

Frequent Co-Authors

Leslie S. Greenberg
Leslie S. Greenberg York University
Michael J. Constantino
Michael J. Constantino University of Massachusetts Amherst
Miguel M. Gonçalves
Miguel M. Gonçalves University of Minho
Myrna L. Friedlander
Myrna L. Friedlander University at Albany, State University of New York
William B. Stiles
William B. Stiles Miami University
Heidi M. Levitt
Heidi M. Levitt University of Massachusetts Boston
Louis G. Castonguay
Louis G. Castonguay Pennsylvania State University
Nicholas Ladany
Nicholas Ladany Lehigh University
Jeffrey A. Hayes
Jeffrey A. Hayes Pennsylvania State University
Stanley B. Messer
Stanley B. Messer Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths and flexible study options. Many institutions offer programs that cater to students seeking a range of specializations, from clinical psychology to counseling and research.

When choosing a program, consider its reputation, specialties, and local opportunities. For example, popular psychology degrees in Kent stand out for their comprehensive curricula and experienced faculty. Alternatively, those interested in thriving urban environments may explore the best-ranked psychology degree programs in Las Vegas, which provide students with networking opportunities in a vibrant city setting.

Those looking for top academic standards can consider the top-ranked psychology degree programs in Nashville, offering strong research components and practical training. If you prefer programs with a focus on applied practice and community engagement, you might explore the best-ranked psychology degree programs in Oklahoma.

This wide range of options allows students to tailor their learning experience and prepare for careers in mental health, human resources, education, and beyond—all from the flexibility of online study.

Best Scientists Citing Lynne Angus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles