World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
10697
World Ranking
6864
National Ranking
3723

Michael J. Constantino publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Constantino sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 197 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael J. Constantino D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Constantino sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Michael J. Constantino is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology, with a particular focus on clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Their publication record includes over one hundred works, spanning several subfields such as experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and applied psychology.

Their research explores multiple topics related to psychotherapy techniques and applications, attachment and relationship dynamics, and various mental health conditions including anxiety, depression, personality disorders, and schizophrenia. They have also contributed to digital mental health interventions and broader mental health research topics.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Michael J. Constantino include:

  • Testing a deliberate practice workshop for developing appropriate responsivity to resistance markers, 2020, Psychotherapy
  • Effect of Matching Therapists to Patients vs Assignment as Usual on Adult Psychotherapy Outcomes, 2021, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Indirect effect of patient outcome expectation on improvement through alliance quality: A meta-analysis, 2020, Psychotherapy Research
  • Nonprofessional Peer Support to Improve Mental Health: Randomized Trial of a Scalable Web-Based Peer Counseling Course, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Evidence-Based Therapist Responsivity to Disruptive Clinical Process, 2020, Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

The scientist collaborates frequently with other researchers in the field. Among the most frequent co-authors are James F. Boswell, Alice E. Coyne, Averi N. Gaines, David R. Kraus, and Henny A. Westra.

Michael J. Constantino has published often in specific journals commonly cited in clinical psychological research, including:

  • Psychotherapy
  • Psychotherapy Research
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • Journal of Counseling Psychology
  • Counselling and Psychotherapy Research

In addition to peer-reviewed articles, they have contributed to academic books, including one published by the American Psychological Association titled Deliberate practice in cognitive behavioral therapy (2021).

Michael J. Constantino's work is recognized within the professional community, including fellowship status in the American Psychological Association since 2009.

Best Publications

  • The working alliance: Where are we and where should we go?

    Louis G. Castonguay;Michael J. Constantino;Martin Grosse Holtforth

  • Comorbid depression, chronic pain, and disability in primary care.

    Bruce A Arnow;Enid M Hunkeler;Christine M Blasey;Janelle Lee

  • Preliminary reliability and validity of the generalized anxiety disorder questionnaire-IV: A revised self-report diagnostic measure of generalized anxiety disorder

    Michelle G. Newman;Andrea R. Zuellig;Kevin E. Kachin;Michael J. Constantino

  • Are patient expectations still relevant for psychotherapy process and outcome

    Roger P. Greenberg;Michael J. Constantino;Noah Bruce

  • How interpersonal motives clarify the meaning of interpersonal behavior: A revised circumplex model.

    Leonard M. Horowitz;Kelly R. Wilson;Bulent Turan;Pavel Zolotsev

  • The therapeutic relationship in e-therapy for mental health: a systematic review.

    Madalina Sucala;Julie B Schnur;Michael J Constantino;Sarah J Miller

  • Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations

    Michael J Constantino;Diane B Arnkoff;Carol R Glass;Rebecca M Ametrano

  • Training Implications of Harmful Effects of Psychological Treatments

    Louis G. Castonguay;James F. Boswell;Michael J. Constantino;Marvin R. Goldfried

  • The association between patient characteristics and the therapeutic alliance in cognitive-behavioral and interpersonal therapy for bulimia nervosa

    Michael J. Constantino;Bruce A. Arnow;Christine Blasey;W. Stewart Agras

  • The relationship between the therapeutic alliance and treatment outcome in two distinct psychotherapies for chronic depression.

    Bruce A. Arnow;Dana Steidtmann;Christine Blasey;Rachel Manber

  • Dropouts versus completers among chronically depressed outpatients.

    Bruce A. Arnow;Christine Blasey;Rachel Manber;Michael J. Constantino

  • A meta-analysis of the association between patients' early treatment outcome expectation and their posttreatment outcomes

    Michael J Constantino;Andreea Vîslă;Alice E Coyne;James F Boswell

  • Psychotherapist mindfulness and the psychotherapy process.

    Noah G. Bruce;Rachel Manber;Shauna L. Shapiro;Michael J. Constantino

  • A meta-analysis of the relation between therapeutic alliance and treatment outcome in eating disorders

    Tiffany A. Graves;Nassim Tabri;Heather Thompson-Brenner;Debra L. Franko

  • Integrating motivational interviewing with cognitive-behavioral therapy for severe generalized anxiety disorder: An allegiance-controlled randomized clinical trial.

    Henny A. Westra;Michael J. Constantino;Martin M. Antony

  • Effectiveness of psychotherapy and combination treatment for chronic depression.

    Bruce A. Arnow;Michael J. Constantino

  • Clinician interventions and participant characteristics that foster adaptive patient expectations for psychotherapy and psychotherapeutic change.

    Michael J. Constantino;Rebecca M. Ametrano;Roger P. Greenberg

  • Integrative Cognitive Therapy for Depression: A Preliminary Investigation.

    Louis G. Castonguay;Alexander J. Schut;Deane E. Aikens;Michael J. Constantino

  • Catastrophizing, depression and pain-related disability.

    Bruce A. Arnow;Christine M. Blasey;Michael J. Constantino;Rebecca Robinson

  • The therapeutic alliance in cognitive-behavioral therapy.

    Louis G. Castonguay;Michael J. Constantino;Andrew A. McAleavey;Marvin R. Goldfried

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin M. Antony
Martin M. Antony Toronto Metropolitan University
Louis G. Castonguay
Louis G. Castonguay Pennsylvania State University
Bruce A. Arnow
Bruce A. Arnow Stanford University
Lynne Angus
Lynne Angus York University
Rachel Manber
Rachel Manber Stanford University
Larry E. Beutler
Larry E. Beutler University of California, Santa Barbara
Michelle G. Newman
Michelle G. Newman Pennsylvania State University
Marvin R. Goldfried
Marvin R. Goldfried Stony Brook University
Barbara O. Rothbaum
Barbara O. Rothbaum Emory University
Michael E. Thase
Michael E. Thase University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree options and diverse career pathways. Many students consider related fields, such as social work, which offers specialized paths for those interested in helping communities and individuals.

When choosing a degree program, affordability and reputation are often top priorities. If budget is a concern, you might want to look at the cheapest social work programs in the West. These programs offer solid training without excessive financial burden.

Regional strengths also matter. For example, the most popular social work degree programs in Arizona provide excellent opportunities in the Southwest, while those in Duluth offer a different environment and educational experience, as seen with the top-ranked social work degree programs in Duluth.

If you’re considering the East Coast, don’t miss the best-ranked social work degree programs in North Carolina. Each of these options can set you on a rewarding path, whether your goal is counseling, case management, or psychology research.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Constantino

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles