World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
50
Citations
13570
World Ranking
3905
National Ranking
16

Fyodor A. Kondrashov publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fyodor A. Kondrashov sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 98 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Fyodor A. Kondrashov D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fyodor A. Kondrashov sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fyodor A. Kondrashov is affiliated with the Institute of Science and Technology Austria in Austria. Their research spans several intersecting fields, with a primary focus on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, along with medicine. The subfields in which they have contributed include molecular biology, genetics, infectious diseases, plant science, and endocrinology.

Their research topics cover a variety of areas relevant to contemporary biomedical sciences, including:

  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research
  • Evolution and genetic dynamics
  • Protein structure and dynamics
  • Enzyme structure and function
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies

Kondrashov's recent papers include:

  • "Using AlphaFold to predict the impact of single mutations on protein stability and function" (2023), published in PLoS ONE
  • "Plants with genetically encoded autoluminescence" (2020), published in Nature Biotechnology
  • "Rates of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and vaccination impact the fate of vaccine-resistant strains" (2021), published in Scientific Reports
  • "Using AlphaFold to predict the impact of single mutations on protein stability and function" (2021), published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Unlocking capacities of genomics for the COVID-19 response and future pandemics" (2022), published in Nature Methods

Frequently collaborating co-authors include:

  • Alexander S. Mishin
  • Louisa González Somermeyer
  • Karen S. Sarkisyan
  • Simón A. Rella
  • Yuliya Kulikova

Kondrashov's work has appeared in a variety of publication venues, with the most frequent including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Scientific Reports
  • Nature Biotechnology
  • European Journal of Human Genetics
  • Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

Their research efforts have contributed across multiple highly specialized areas, addressing both fundamental and applied aspects of molecular biology and infectious disease. This includes advancing understanding of protein stability linked to mutations, viral transmission dynamics, and applications of genomics in pandemic response efforts. The combination of studies on COVID-19 and diverse biological processes such as bioluminescence reflects a breadth of inquiry within molecular and genetic sciences.

Best Publications

  • The evolution of gene duplications: classifying and distinguishing between models.

    Hideki Innan;Fyodor Kondrashov

  • Selection in the evolution of gene duplications

    Fyodor A Kondrashov;Igor B Rogozin;Yuri I Wolf;Eugene V Koonin

  • The ctenophore genome and the evolutionary origins of neural systems

    Leonid L. Moroz;Kevin M. Kocot;Mathew R. Citarella;Sohn Dosung

  • Gene duplication as a mechanism of genomic adaptation to a changing environment

    Fyodor A. Kondrashov

  • Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation

    Alexey S. Kondrashov;Fyodor A. Kondrashov

  • Selection for short introns in highly expressed genes.

    Cristian I. Castillo-Davis;Sergei L. Mekhedov;Daniel L. Hartl;Eugene V. Koonin

  • Local fitness landscape of the green fluorescent protein.

    Karen S. Sarkisyan;Dmitry A. Bolotin;Margarita V. Meer;Dinara R. Usmanova;Dinara R. Usmanova

  • Epistasis as the primary factor in molecular evolution

    Michael S. Breen;Carsten Kemena;Peter K. Vlasov;Cedric Notredame

  • Dobzhansky–Muller incompatibilities in protein evolution

    Alexey S. Kondrashov;Shamil Sunyaev;Fyodor A. Kondrashov

  • A universal trend of amino acid gain and loss in protein evolution

    I. King Jordan;Fyodor A. Kondrashov;Ivan A. Adzhubei;Yuri I. Wolf

  • Role of selection in fixation of gene duplications.

    Fyodor A. Kondrashov;Alexey S. Kondrashov

  • A common framework for understanding the origin of genetic dominance and evolutionary fates of gene duplications.

    Fyodor A. Kondrashov;Eugene V. Koonin

  • Sequence space and the ongoing expansion of the protein universe

    Inna S. Povolotskaya;Fyodor A. Kondrashov

  • Evolution of glyoxylate cycle enzymes in Metazoa: evidence of multiple horizontal transfer events and pseudogene formation

    Fyodor A Kondrashov;Eugene V Koonin;Igor G Morgunov;Tatiana V Finogenova

  • Origin of alternative splicing by tandem exon duplication

    Fyodor A. Kondrashov;Eugene V. Koonin

  • Presence of ATG triplets in 5′ untranslated regions of eukaryotic cDNAs correlates with a ‘weak’ context of the start codon

    Igor B. Rogozin;Alexey V. Kochetov;Fyodor A. Kondrashov;Eugene V. Koonin

  • Complete mitochondrial genome and phylogeny of Pleistocene mammoth Mammuthus primigenius

    Evgeny I Rogaev;Yuri K Moliaka;Yuri K Moliaka;Boris A Malyarchuk;Fyodor A Kondrashov

  • Multidimensional epistasis and the disadvantage of sex

    Fyodor A. Kondrashov;Alexey S. Kondrashov

  • Prediction of functional sites by analysis of sequence and structure conservation

    Anna R. Panchenko;Fyodor Kondrashov;Stephen Bryant

  • Genetically encodable bioluminescent system from fungi

    Alexey A. Kotlobay;Karen S. Sarkisyan;Yuliana A. Mokrushina;Marina Marcet-Houben

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexey S. Kondrashov
Alexey S. Kondrashov University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Eugene V. Koonin
Eugene V. Koonin National Institutes of Health
Yuri I. Wolf
Yuri I. Wolf National Institutes of Health
Igor B. Rogozin
Igor B. Rogozin National Institutes of Health
Shamil R. Sunyaev
Shamil R. Sunyaev Harvard University
Cedric Notredame
Cedric Notredame Pompeu Fabra University
Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis
Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis University of Geneva
John C. Marioni
John C. Marioni European Bioinformatics Institute
Luis Serrano
Luis Serrano Centre for Genomic Regulation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Genetics can open diverse career paths in healthcare, research, and education. However, if you’re considering related online programs, it’s helpful to explore degrees that offer flexibility, affordability, and direct pathways to high-demand roles.

For students interested in patient care, exploring nursing school without entrance exam requirements is a practical option. These programs eliminate common barriers and simplify the admissions process.

Those looking to advance quickly might compare accelerated lpn programs for faster entry into the workforce. Similarly, individuals interested in leadership roles can benefit from the cheapest mha programs online healthcare to gain administrative expertise without a heavy financial burden.

For research-focused professionals, pursuing the cheapest online nursing phd programs can help you achieve academic goals while managing costs.

Together, these pathways demonstrate how flexible online education supports career mobility in and around the field of Genetics.

Best Scientists Citing Fyodor A. Kondrashov

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles