World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Francisco J. Blanco

Francisco J. Blanco

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 93 10733 10078 152 149 858 40241

Francisco J. Blanco publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Francisco J. Blanco between 1979 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Francisco J. Blanco published across 48 years, from 1979 to 2026, averaging 27 papers a year. Output peaked at 90 publications in 2014. 45 of the 1,298 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 90. Peak 90 publications in 2014. 1979: 2 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 4 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 15 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 33 publications 2008: 58 publications 2009: 54 publications 2010: 79 publications 2011: 74 publications 2012: 81 publications 2013: 80 publications 2014: 90 publications 2015: 75 publications 2016: 58 publications 2017: 61 publications 2018: 56 publications 2019: 64 publications 2020: 54 publications 2021: 52 publications 2022: 37 publications 2023: 31 publications 2024: 38 publications 2025: 44 publications 2026: 1 publication
1979 2026

1,298 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Francisco J. Blanco: publications per year, 1979 to 2026
Year Publications
1979 2
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 1
1985 4
1986 0
1987 1
1988 1
1989 2
1990 4
1991 3
1992 4
1993 3
1994 6
1995 15
1996 6
1997 8
1998 11
1999 9
2000 10
2001 11
2002 11
2003 16
2004 16
2005 11
2006 22
2007 33
2008 58
2009 54
2010 79
2011 74
2012 81
2013 80
2014 90
2015 75
2016 58
2017 61
2018 56
2019 64
2020 54
2021 52
2022 37
2023 31
2024 38
2025 44
2026 1
Total 1,298
Download as CSV

Francisco J. Blanco publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francisco J. Blanco sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 841–860 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 858 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177 858
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Francisco J. Blanco D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francisco J. Blanco sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 93
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Francisco J. Blanco is affiliated with the University of A Coruña in Spain. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with extensive work in Rheumatology, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, and Cancer Research.

The scientist has contributed significantly to topics including:

  • Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
  • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • Bone and Joint Diseases
  • Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research

Francisco J. Blanco has published extensively in several key venues, most notably:

  • Osteoarthritis and Cartilage (64 publications)
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (39 publications)
  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature (23 publications)
  • Osteoarthritis Imaging (10 publications)
  • Scientific Reports (6 publications)

Some of the recent publications associated with or relevant to their research include:

  • Subcutaneous tanezumab for osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: efficacy and safety results from a 24-week randomised phase III study with a 24-week follow-up period, 2020, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Prevalence of hospital PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases in patients with chronic inflammatory and autoimmune rheumatic diseases, 2020, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Osteoarthritis endotype discovery via clustering of biochemical marker data, 2022, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress in Rheumatoid Arthritis, 2022, Antioxidants
  • Cohort profile: The Applied Public-Private Research enabling OsteoArthritis Clinical Headway (IMI-APPROACH) study: a 2-year, European, cohort study to describe, validate and predict phenotypes of osteoarthritis using clinical, imaging and biochemical markers, 2020, BMJ Open

Frequent collaborators of Francisco J. Blanco include:

  • Ignacio Rego-Pérez
  • I.K. Haugen
  • M. Kloppenburg
  • Francis Bérenbaum
  • N. Oreiro

Best Publications

  • Circulating microRNAs in sera correlate with soluble biomarkers of immune activation but do not predict mortality in ART treated individuals with HIV-1 infection : a case control study

    Daniel D. Murray;Kazuo Suzuki;Matthew Law;Jonel Trebicka

  • OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis

    Raveendhara Bannuru;M. C. Osani;E. E. Vaysbrot;Nigel Arden;Nigel Arden

  • Chondrocyte apoptosis induced by nitric oxide.

    F J Blanco;R L Ochs;H Schwarz;M Lotz

  • Osteoarthritis chondrocytes die by apoptosis. A possible pathway for osteoarthritis pathology.

    Blanco Fj;Guitian R;Vázquez-Martul E;de Toro Fj

  • Autophagy is a protective mechanism in normal cartilage, and its aging-related loss is linked with cell death and osteoarthritis.

    Beatriz Caramés;Noboru Taniguchi;Shuhei Otsuki;Francisco J. Blanco

  • Call for standardized definitions of osteoarthritis and risk stratification for clinical trials and clinical use.

    V B Kraus;F J Blanco;M Englund;M A Karsdal

  • 2018 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis

    Margreet Kloppenburg;Féline P.B. Kroon;Francisco J. Blanco;Michael Doherty

  • The role of mitochondria in osteoarthritis.

    Francisco J. Blanco;Ignacio Rego;Cristina Ruiz-Romero

  • Autophagy activation by rapamycin reduces severity of experimental osteoarthritis

    Beatriz Caramés;Akihiko Hasegawa;Noboru Taniguchi;Shigeru Miyaki

  • Glucosamine sulfate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis symptoms: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study using acetaminophen as a side comparator

    Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont;José Andrés Román Ivorra;María del Carmen Trabado;Francisco Javier Blanco

  • Kidney tubular abnormalities in the absence of impaired glomerular function in HIV patients treated with tenofovir.

    Pablo Labarga;Pablo Barreiro;Luz Martin-Carbonero;Sonia Rodriguez-Novoa

  • Major histocompatibility complex associations of ankylosing spondylitis are complex and involve further epistasis with ERAP1.

    Adrian Cortes;Sara L. Pulit;Paul J. Leo;Jenny J. Pointon

  • Combined chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine for painful knee osteoarthritis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial versus celecoxib

    Marc C. Hochberg;Johanne Martel-Pelletier;Jordi Monfort;Ingrid Möller

  • Cell death and apoptosis in osteoarthritic cartilage.

    H A Kim;F J Blanco

  • Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in patients with psoriatic arthritis and current skin involvement: a phase III, randomised, controlled trial (PALACE 3)

    Christopher J Edwards;Francisco J Blanco;Jeffrey Crowley;Charles A Birbara

  • Long-term safety and efficacy of abatacept in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

    Nicolino Ruperto;Daniel J. Lovell;Pierre Quartier;Eliana Paz

  • Growth factor responsiveness of human articular chondrocytes in aging and development

    Pierre-andré Guerne;Francisco Blanco;André Kaelin;Alain Desgeorges

  • Mitochondrial respiratory activity is altered in osteoarthritic human articular chondrocytes

    Emilia Maneiro;Miguel A. Martín;María C. de Andres;Maria J. López-Armada

  • Intravenous administration of expanded allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in refractory rheumatoid arthritis (Cx611): results of a multicentre, dose escalation, randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled phase Ib/IIa clinical trial.

    Jose M Álvaro-Gracia;Juan A Jover;Rosario García-Vicuña;Luis Carreño

  • Cytokines, tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-1β, differentially regulate apoptosis in osteoarthritis cultured human chondrocytes

    M.J. López-Armada;B. Caramés;M. Lires-Deán;B. Cillero-Pastor

Frequent Co-Authors

Heino Falcke
Heino Falcke Radboud University
J. J. Beatty
J. J. Beatty The Ohio State University
Danilo Zavrtanik
Danilo Zavrtanik Jožef Stefan Institute
H. M. Spinka
H. M. Spinka Argonne National Laboratory
Luis A. Anchordoqui
Luis A. Anchordoqui City University of New York
P. Gouffon
P. Gouffon Universidade de São Paulo
Angela V. Olinto
Angela V. Olinto University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their healthcare careers beyond traditional undergraduate pathways, online degrees offer flexible and efficient options. Many students are attracted to the shortest online dnp program options, which allow experienced nurses to achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice in less time. These accelerated programs are ideal for working professionals seeking to boost their qualifications without a lengthy career interruption.

If you are searching for more accessible degree options, consider exploring dnp programs online. These programs are designed to offer flexible learning schedules and less rigorous entry requirements for qualified candidates, while maintaining high educational standards.

For those looking to enter the healthcare field quickly, fast track medical programs, such as Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) pathways, provide accelerated coursework with a focus on practical skills.

Additionally, mental health is a growing field within healthcare. Nurses interested in specialized roles can consider msn to pmhnp online programs to become Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioners, which offer both speed and specialization via online study.

Best Scientists Citing Francisco J. Blanco

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles