World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
95
Citations
48225
World Ranking
758
National Ranking
477

Bruce E. Wampold publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce E. Wampold sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 297 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Bruce E. Wampold D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce E. Wampold sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - APA Award for Distinguished Professional Contributions to Applied Research
  • 1990 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Bruce E. Wampold is a researcher affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their primary field of study is Psychology, with a particular focus on Clinical Psychology. Their research also covers subfields including Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, and General Health Professions.

The main topics of their work encompass Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications, Mental Health Research Topics, Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes, Personality Disorders and Psychopathology, Attachment and Relationship Dynamics, Treatment of Major Depression, and Digital Mental Health Interventions.

Among their recent papers are:

  • The reciprocal relationship between alliance and early treatment symptoms: A two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis., 2020, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • The alliance in mental health care: conceptualization, evidence and clinical applications, 2023, World Psychiatry
  • Examining therapist effects in the alliance-outcome relationship: A multilevel meta-analysis., 2021, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • Assessing the alliance-outcome association adjusted for patient characteristics and treatment processes: A meta-analytic summary of direct comparisons., 2020, Journal of Counseling Psychology
  • It's the therapist and the treatment: The structure of common therapeutic relationship factors, 2021, Psychotherapy Research

Wampold frequently publishes in the following academic venues:

  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • Journal of Counseling Psychology
  • Psychotherapy Research
  • Psychotherapy
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

The scientist often collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Pål Ulvenes
  • Christoph Flückiger
  • Helene Amundsen Nissen-Lie
  • Andreas Høstmælingen
  • Mikkel Eielsen

Bruce E. Wampold has been recognized with the APA Award for Distinguished Professional Contributions to Applied Research in 2007 and has been a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) since 1990.

Best Publications

  • The Great Psychotherapy Debate: Models, Methods and Findings

    Bruce E. Wampold

  • Research Design in Counseling

    P. Paul Heppner;Dennis M. Kivlighan;Bruce E. Wampold

  • How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update.

    Bruce E. Wampold

  • Evidence-based therapy relationships: research conclusions and clinical practices.

    John C. Norcross;Bruce E. Wampold

  • The alliance in adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic synthesis.

    Christoph Flückiger;A. C. Del Re;Bruce E. Wampold;Adam O. Horvath

  • A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: Empiricially, "all must have prizes."

    Bruce E. Wampold;Gregory W. Mondin;Marcia Moody;Frederick Stich

  • The Great Psychotherapy Debate

    Bruce E. Wampold;Zac E. Imel

  • Untangling the alliance-outcome correlation: exploring the relative importance of therapist and patient variability in the alliance.

    Scott A. Baldwin;Bruce E. Wampold;Zac E. Imel

  • Mindfulness-based interventions for psychiatric disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Simon B. Goldberg;Raymond P. Tucker;Preston A. Greene;Richard J. Davidson

  • Where oh where are the specific ingredients? A meta-analysis of component studies in counseling and psychotherapy.

    Hyun-nie Ahn;Bruce E. Wampold

  • How central is the alliance in psychotherapy? A multilevel longitudinal meta-analysis.

    Christoph Flückiger;A. C. Del Re;Bruce E. Wampold;Dianne Symonds

  • Culturally adapted psychotherapy and the legitimacy of myth: a direct-comparison meta-analysis.

    Steven G. Benish;Stephen Quintana;Bruce E. Wampold

  • The heart and soul of change: Delivering what works in therapy, 2nd ed.

    Barry L. Duncan;Scott D. Miller;Bruce E. Wampold;Mark A. Hubble

  • Estimating Variability in Outcomes Attributable to Therapists: A Naturalistic Study of Outcomes in Managed Care.

    Bruce E Wampold;George S Jeb Brown

  • Let's Face Facts: Common Factors Are More Potent Than Specific Therapy Ingredients

    Stanley B. Messer;Bruce E. Wampold

  • Expanding the lens of evidence-based practice in psychotherapy: a common factors perspective.

    Kevin M. Laska;Alan S. Gurman;Bruce E. Wampold

  • Psychotherapy: The humanistic (and effective) treatment.

    Bruce E. Wampold

  • Therapist effects in the therapeutic alliance–outcome relationship: A restricted-maximum likelihood meta-analysis☆

    A.C. Del Re;Christoph Flückiger;Adam O. Horvath;Dianne Symonds

  • Sequential Analysis of Conflict and Accord in Distressed and Nondistressed Marital Partners.

    Gayla Margolin;Bruce E. Wampold

  • Implications of Placebo and Nocebo Effects for Clinical Practice: Expert Consensus.

    Andrea W M Evers;Luana Colloca;Charlotte Blease;Marco Annoni

  • The relative efficacy of bona fide psychotherapies for treating post-traumatic stress disorder: a meta-analysis of direct comparisons

    Steven G. Benish;Zac E. Imel;Bruce E. Wampold

Frequent Co-Authors

Christoph Flückiger
Christoph Flückiger University of Kassel
Zac E. Imel
Zac E. Imel University of Utah
Asle Hoffart
Asle Hoffart University of Oslo
Adam O. Horvath
Adam O. Horvath Simon Fraser University
Stephanie L. Budge
Stephanie L. Budge University of Wisconsin–Madison
Donald R. Atkinson
Donald R. Atkinson University of California, Santa Barbara
John C. Norcross
John C. Norcross University of Scranton
Simon B. Goldberg
Simon B. Goldberg University of Wisconsin–Madison
Rodney K. Goodyear
Rodney K. Goodyear University of Redlands
Jesse Owen
Jesse Owen University of Denver

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree options and career pathways. Many students choose to combine psychology studies with social work programs, as both fields focus on helping individuals and communities thrive. A strong foundation in psychology can lead to roles in counseling, case management, and advocacy in social service settings.

If you're interested in specializing, there are several regionally recognized programs for social work degrees. For example, the best social work degree programs in San Diego and the top social work programs in Tacoma both offer unique curricula that integrate mental health, family support, and community development.

For those aiming for flexibility or a broader selection, the best social work degree programs in USA cover a range of concentrations—including online options—designed for aspiring mental health professionals. You can also discover specialized programs like the best social work programs in Utah, which are known for their innovative approaches.

With so many paths available, pairing a psychology degree with social work can expand your knowledge and career prospects in meaningful ways.

Best Scientists Citing Bruce E. Wampold

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles