World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Julian A. Rubel

Julian A. Rubel

Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 41 627 627 15 15 112 4680
Psychology 43 7357 6861 351 345 112 5586

Julian A. Rubel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Julian A. Rubel between 2012 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Julian A. Rubel published across 15 years, from 2012 to 2026, averaging 14.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2025. 33 of the 211 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2012 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2025. 2012: 1 publication 2013: 2 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 8 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 30 publications 2024: 28 publications 2025: 32 publications 2026: 1 publication
2012 2026

211 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Julian A. Rubel: publications per year, 2012 to 2026
Year Publications
2012 1
2013 2
2014 1
2015 8
2016 5
2017 17
2018 15
2019 15
2020 21
2021 20
2022 15
2023 30
2024 28
2025 32
2026 1
Total 211
Download as CSV

Julian A. Rubel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julian A. Rubel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 112 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 112
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Julian A. Rubel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julian A. Rubel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Julian A. Rubel is affiliated with Osnabrück University in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology, with a specialization in clinical and experimental domains. Their work encompasses a wide range of topics primarily related to mental health, psychotherapy, and cognitive processes.

Their publication record includes research articles published in notable venues such as:

  • Psychotherapy Research
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
  • Cognitive Therapy and Research

Rubel's recent papers cover diverse themes and have appeared in journals focused on psychological research and clinical practice. Selected recent works include:

  • "Time to get personal? The impact of researchers choices on the selection of treatment targets using the experience sampling methodology," 2020, Journal of Psychosomatic Research
  • "The reciprocal relationship between alliance and early treatment symptoms: A two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis," 2020, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • "Prospective evaluation of a clinical decision support system in psychological therapy," 2021, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • "Personalized treatment selection in routine care: Integrating machine learning and statistical algorithms to recommend cognitive behavioral or psychodynamic therapy," 2020, Psychotherapy Research
  • "A Systematic Review of Momentary Assessment Designs for Mood and Anxiety Symptoms," 2021, Frontiers in Psychology

Their frequent collaborators include several researchers in the field, with whom they have co-authored multiple publications:

  • Wolfgang Lutz
  • Brian Schwartz
  • Anne-Katharina Deisenhofer
  • Juan Martín Gómez Penedo
  • Mila Hall

Julian A. Rubel's research interests span several subfields of psychology, prominently featuring:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health

The topics most frequently addressed in their work focus on:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Psychiatric Care and Mental Health Services

Best Publications

  • Exploring the idiographic dynamics of mood and anxiety via network analysis.

    Aaron J Fisher;Jonathan W Reeves;Glenn Lawyer;John D Medaglia

  • The ups and downs of psychotherapy: Sudden gains and sudden losses identified with session reports

    Wolfgang Lutz;Torsten Ehrlich;Julian Rubel;Nora Hallwachs

  • Towards integrating personalized feedback research into clinical practice: Development of the Trier Treatment Navigator (TTN).

    Wolfgang Lutz;Julian A. Rubel;Brian Schwartz;Viola Schilling

  • Patient-focused and feedback research in psychotherapy: Where are we and where do we want to go?

    Wolfgang Lutz;Kim De Jong;Julian Rubel

  • Feedback-informed treatment versus usual psychological treatment for depression and anxiety: a multisite, open-label, cluster randomised controlled trial

    Jaime Delgadillo;Kim de Jong;Mike Lucock;Wolfgang Lutz

  • Dynamic norms drive sustainable consumption: Norm-based nudging helps café customers to avoid disposable to-go-cups

    David D. Loschelder;David D. Loschelder;Henrik Siepelmeyer;Daniel Fischer;Daniel Fischer;Julian A. Rubel

  • Dynamic models of individual change in psychotherapy process research.

    Fredrik Falkenström;Steven Finkel;Rolf Sandell;Julian A. Rubel

  • Patterns of early change and their relationship to outcome and early treatment termination in patients with panic disorder.

    Wolfgang Lutz;Stefan G. Hofmann;Julian Rubel;James F. Boswell

  • Using network analysis for the prediction of treatment dropout in patients with mood and anxiety disorders: A methodological proof-of-concept study.

    Wolfgang Lutz;Brian Schwartz;Stefan G. Hofmann;Aaron J. Fisher

  • Nonverbal synchrony: A new approach to better understand psychotherapeutic processes and drop-out

    Jane Paulick;Anne-Katharina Deisenhofer;Fabian Ramseyer;Wolfgang Tschacher

  • Feedback and therapist effects in the context of treatment outcome and treatment length

    Wolfgang Lutz;Julian Rubel;Anne-Katharina Schiefele;Dirk Zimmermann

  • Prospective evaluation of a clinical decision support system in psychological therapy

    Wolfgang Lutz;Anne-Katharina Deisenhofer;Julian Rubel;Björn Bennemann

  • Therapist Effects on and Predictors of Non-Consensual Dropout in Psychotherapy

    Dirk Zimmermann;Julian Rubel;Andrew C. Page;Wolfgang Lutz

  • Preventing depression in the offspring of parents with depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

    Johanna Loechner;Kornelija Starman;Katharina Galuschka;Jeanette Tamm

  • Therapeutic bond judgments: Congruence and incongruence.

    Dana Atzil-Slonim;Eran Bar-Kalifa;Eshkol Rafaeli;Wolfgang Lutz

  • Reliability of Therapist Effects in Practice-Based Psychotherapy Research: A Guide for the Planning of Future Studies

    Anne-Katharina Schiefele;Wolfgang Lutz;Michael Barkham;Julian Rubel

  • Patients' in-session experiences and symptom change: Session-to-session effects on a within- and between-patient level.

    Julian A. Rubel;David Rosenbaum;Wolfgang Lutz

  • Improving the efficiency of psychological treatment using outcome feedback technology

    Jaime Delgadillo;Karen Overend;Michael Lucock;Martin Groom

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolfgang Lutz
Wolfgang Lutz University of Trier
Brian S. Schwartz
Brian S. Schwartz Johns Hopkins University
Jaime Delgadillo
Jaime Delgadillo University of Sheffield
Ulrich Stangier
Ulrich Stangier Goethe University Frankfurt
Eshkol Rafaeli
Eshkol Rafaeli Bar-Ilan University
Bernhard Strauss
Bernhard Strauss Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Aaron J. Fisher
Aaron J. Fisher University of California, Berkeley
Andreas J. Fallgatter
Andreas J. Fallgatter University of Tübingen
Ann-Christine Ehlis
Ann-Christine Ehlis University of Tübingen
Christoph Flückiger
Christoph Flückiger University of Kassel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to many specialized career pathways. One prominent option is industrial and organizational psychology career paths, which focus on improving workplace dynamics, productivity, and employee wellbeing. These roles are in high demand within businesses and consultancy firms.

Those interested in applied behavior analysis might pursue a master’s degree and examine behavioral psychology masters jobs. Such roles are vital in education, mental health, and rehabilitation settings, addressing behavioral challenges and improving outcomes for diverse populations.

Another exciting area is military service, where those with a background in psychology can explore psychology army jobs. Careers in military psychology support service members’ mental health, resilience, and performance, making a critical impact within the armed forces.

For students drawn to the biological aspects of psychology, neuropsychology job outlook offers insight into brain functioning, brain injuries, and neurological conditions. This advanced field is experiencing steady growth as technology and research tools advance.

No matter your interests, online psychology degrees in the USA offer flexible options to start or advance your career in these exciting fields.

Best Scientists Citing Julian A. Rubel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles