World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
6104
World Ranking
7641
National Ranking
758

Jaime Delgadillo publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jaime Delgadillo sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 125 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jaime Delgadillo D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jaime Delgadillo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jaime Delgadillo is affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Their research spans a variety of topics within psychology, with a primary focus on clinical and experimental subfields. Their main field of study is Psychology, with particular emphasis on Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Delgadillo's recent publications include the following papers:

  • Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis (2020), published in Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
  • The promise of machine learning in predicting treatment outcomes in psychiatry (2021), published in World Psychiatry
  • Mental Health During COVID-19 Lockdown in the United Kingdom (2020), published in Psychosomatic Medicine
  • Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) in the United Kingdom: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 10-years of practice-based evidence (2020), published in British Journal of Clinical Psychology
  • Stratified Care vs Stepped Care for Depression (2021), published in JAMA Psychiatry

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Stephen Kellett
  • Wolfgang Lutz
  • Michael Barkham
  • Melanie Simmonds-Buckley
  • Dean McMillan

Delgadillo's work is often published in the following venues:

  • Psychotherapy Research
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy

Their research topics cover a broad array of mental health and psychological treatment themes, including:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment

Within the field of psychology, Delgadillo's research contributions engage particularly with clinical applications and the intersection of digital tools and mental health treatment. Their studies also investigate the effectiveness of different care models and methods to improve access and outcomes in psychological therapies.

Best Publications

  • Accuracy of the PHQ-2 Alone and in Combination With the PHQ-9 for Screening to Detect Major Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Brooke Levis;Brooke Levis;Ying Sun;Chen He;Yin Wu;Yin Wu

  • The promise of machine learning in predicting treatment outcomes in psychiatry

    Adam M Chekroud;Julia Bondar;Jaime Delgadillo;Gavin Doherty

  • The dose-response effect in routinely delivered psychological therapies: A systematic review.

    Louisa Robinson;Jaime Delgadillo;Stephen Kellett

  • Mental health during COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom.

    Christoph Pieh;Sanja Budimir;Jaime Delgadillo;Michael Barkham

  • Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) in the United Kingdom: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 10-years of practice-based evidence.

    Sarah Wakefield;Stephen Kellett;Melanie Simmonds-Buckley;Daniel Stockton

  • Different people respond differently to therapy: A demonstration using patient profiling and risk stratification.

    Jaime Delgadillo;Omar Moreea;Wolfgang Lutz

  • Feedback-informed treatment versus usual psychological treatment for depression and anxiety: a multisite, open-label, cluster randomised controlled trial

    Jaime Delgadillo;Kim de Jong;Mike Lucock;Wolfgang Lutz

  • Early changes, attrition, and dose-response in low intensity psychological interventions.

    Jaime Delgadillo;Dean McMillan;Michael Lucock;Chris Leach

  • How durable is the effect of low intensity CBT for depression and anxiety? Remission and relapse in a longitudinal cohort study

    Shehzad Ali;Laura Rhodes;Omar Moreea;Dean McMillan

  • Measurement-Based and Data-Informed Psychological Therapy.

    Unknown

  • Effect of Collaborative Care vs Usual Care on Depressive Symptoms in Older Adults With Subthreshold Depression: The CASPER Randomized Clinical Trial

    Simon Martin Gilbody;Helen Jane Lewis;Joy Ann Adamson;Katie Atherton

  • Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) and Feedback: Research Review and Recommendations

    Unknown

  • Case complexity as a guide for psychological treatment selection

    Jaime Delgadillo;Dale Huey;Hazel Bennett;Dean McMillan

  • Associations between therapists' occupational burnout and their patients' depression and anxiety treatment outcomes.

    Jaime Delgadillo;David Saxon;Michael Barkham

  • Brief case finding tools for anxiety disorders: Validation of GAD-7 and GAD-2 in addictions treatment

    Jaime Delgadillo;Scott Payne;Simon Gilbody;Christine Godfrey

  • On poverty, politics and psychology: the socioeconomic gradient of mental healthcare utilisation and outcomes.

    Jaime Delgadillo;Miqdad Asaria;Shehzad Ali;Simon Gilbody

  • Associations between socioeconomic status and psychological therapy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Megan Finegan;Nick Firth;Caroline Wojnarowski;Jaime Delgadillo

  • Predictors of depression relapse and recurrence after cognitive behavioural therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Caroline Wojnarowski;Nick Firth;Megan Finegan;Jaime Delgadillo

  • Reliability of Therapist Effects in Practice-Based Psychotherapy Research: A Guide for the Planning of Future Studies

    Anne-Katharina Schiefele;Wolfgang Lutz;Michael Barkham;Julian Rubel

  • Efficacy of personalized psychological interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Unknown

  • How reliable is depression screening in alcohol and drug users? A validation of brief and ultra-brief questionnaires

    Jaime Delgadillo;Scott Payne;Simon Gilbody;Christine Godfrey

  • Improving the efficiency of psychological treatment using outcome feedback technology

    Jaime Delgadillo;Karen Overend;Michael Lucock;Martin Groom

  • Targeted prescription of cognitive-behavioral therapy versus person-centered counseling for depression using a machine learning approach

    Jaime Delgadillo;Paulina Gonzalez Salas Duhne

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon Gilbody
Simon Gilbody University of York
Dean McMillan
Dean McMillan University of York
Stephen Kellett
Stephen Kellett University of Sheffield
Wolfgang Lutz
Wolfgang Lutz University of Trier
Michael Barkham
Michael Barkham University of Sheffield
Julian A. Rubel
Julian A. Rubel Osnabrück University
David Richards
David Richards University of Bristol
Christine Godfrey
Christine Godfrey University of York
John Holmes
John Holmes University of Sheffield
Michael J. Lambert
Michael J. Lambert Brigham Young University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens doors to a wide variety of career paths and online degree options in the USA. Many accredited universities offer online programs tailored for students seeking flexibility while maintaining a high standard of education. Prospective students can research options by region, such as the best psychology degree programs ranking in Orlando, which highlights top institutions known for robust online and in-person coursework.

Similarly, reviewing the best psychology degree programs ranking in Phoenix can help you compare and select programs that match your interests, whether you're aiming for clinical practice or counseling.

For students considering specialized fields or research-focused roles, the top psychology degrees in Raleigh feature information on programs with strong reputations in developmental, educational, and organizational psychology.

Additionally, the top psychology programs in Reno can guide you to schools known for unique specialty areas and flexible learning paths.

With growing demand for mental health professionals and diverse career opportunities—such as therapist, counselor, HR specialist, or researcher—earning an online psychology degree can help build a meaningful and versatile career.

Best Scientists Citing Jaime Delgadillo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles