World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 49 2867 2621 492 446 196 16151

Dean McMillan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dean McMillan between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dean McMillan published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 8.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2015. 25 of the 244 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2015. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 5 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 10 publications 2015: 37 publications 2016: 36 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 13 publications
1998 2025

244 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dean McMillan: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 2
2004 2
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 2
2009 1
2010 5
2011 4
2012 5
2013 1
2014 10
2015 37
2016 36
2017 20
2018 13
2019 10
2020 21
2021 13
2022 20
2023 15
2024 12
2025 13
Total 244
Download as CSV

Dean McMillan publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dean McMillan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 194–203 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 196 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304 196
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Dean McMillan D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dean McMillan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186 49
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Dean McMillan is affiliated with the University of York in the United Kingdom and focuses their academic work primarily within the fields of psychology and medicine. Their research contributes notably to subfields such as clinical psychology, social psychology, general health professions, health, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

Their scholarly output includes studies addressing major topics such as mental health treatment and access, health disparities and outcomes, COVID-19 and mental health, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, schizophrenia research and treatment, and digital mental health interventions.

McMillan has published extensively in several journals and platforms, with recurrent appearances in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • Health Technology Assessment
  • UNC Libraries

A selection of recent papers includes:

  • Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis, 2020, Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
  • Psychological and pharmacological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid mental health problems following complex traumatic events: Systematic review and component network meta-analysis, 2020, PLoS Medicine
  • Are there interactional differences between telephone and face-to-face psychological therapy? A systematic review of comparative studies, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores do not accurately estimate depression prevalence: individual participant data meta-analysis, 2020, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • Behavioural activation to prevent depression and loneliness among socially isolated older people with long-term conditions: The BASIL COVID-19 pilot randomised controlled trial, 2021, PLoS Medicine

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Simon Gilbody
  • Carolyn Chew-Graham
  • Elizabeth Littlewood
  • David Ekers
  • Peter Coventry

Best Publications

  • Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis

    Laura Manea;Simon Gilbody;Dean McMillan

  • Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis☆

    Faye Plummer;Laura Manea;Dominic Trepel;Dean McMillan

  • A diagnostic meta-analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) algorithm scoring method as a screen for depression

    Laura Manea;Simon Gilbody;Dean McMillan

  • Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

    Unknown

  • Cost and Outcome of Behavioural Activation versus Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Depression (COBRA): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial

    David A Richards;David Ekers;Dean McMillan;Rod S. Taylor

  • Accuracy of the PHQ-2 Alone and in Combination With the PHQ-9 for Screening to Detect Major Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Brooke Levis;Brooke Levis;Ying Sun;Chen He;Yin Wu;Yin Wu

  • Development of sexually abusive behaviour in sexually victimised males: a longitudinal study

    Daniel Salter;Dean McMillan;Mark Richards;Tiffany Talbot

  • The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: A diagnostic meta-analysis of case-finding ability

    Cathy Brennan;Anne Worrall-Davies;Dean McMillan;Simon Gilbody

  • Screening and case finding for major depressive disorder using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis.

    Andrew Stephen Moriarty;Simon Gilbody;Dean McMillan;Laura Manea

  • Psychometric Comparison of the PHQ-9 and BDI-II for Measuring Response during Treatment of Depression

    Nickolai Titov;Blake F Dear;Dean McMillan;Tracy Anderson

  • Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

    Yin Wu;Brooke Levis;Kira E. Riehm;Nazanin Saadat

  • Can we predict suicide and non-fatal self-harm with the Beck Hopelessness Scale? A meta-analysis

    Dean McMILLAN;Simon Gilbody;Emma Beresford;Liz Neilly

  • Behavioural activation delivered by the non-specialist: phase II randomised controlled trial

    David Ekers;David Richards;Dean McMillan;J. Martin Bland

  • Psychological and pharmacological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid mental health problems following complex traumatic events: systematic review and component network meta-analysis

    Peter Coventry;Nick Meader;Hollie Anne Melton;Melanie Temple

  • Psychometric Comparison of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 and the Penn State Worry Questionnaire for Measuring Response during Treatment of Generalised Anxiety Disorder

    Blake F Dear;Nickolai Titov;Matthew Sunderland;Dean McMillan

  • Fathers’ views and experiences of their own mental health during pregnancy and the first postnatal year: a qualitative interview study of men participating in the UK Born and Bred in Yorkshire (BaBY) cohort

    Zoe Darwin;Paul Michael Galdas;Sharron Hinchliff;Elizabeth Ann Littlewood

  • Defining successful treatment outcome in depression using the PHQ-9: a comparison of methods.

    Dean McMillan;Simon Gilbody;David Richards

  • Identifying depression with the PHQ-2: A diagnostic meta-analysis.

    Laura Manea;Simon Gilbody;Catherine Hewitt;Alice North

  • The diagnostic accuracy of brief versions of the Geriatric Depression Scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Claire Pocklington;Simon Gilbody;Laura Manea;Dean McMillan

  • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores do not accurately estimate depression prevalence: individual participant data meta-analysis

    Brooke Levis;Andrea Benedetti;John P.A. Ioannidis;Ying Sun

  • Faith-adapted psychological therapies for depression and anxiety: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Naomi Anderson;Suzanne Heywood-Everett;Najma Siddiqi;Judy Wright

  • Risk factors for development of sexually abusive behaviour in sexually victimised adolescent boys: cross sectional study

    David Skuse;Arnon Bentovim;Jill Hodges;Jim Stevenson

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon Gilbody
Simon Gilbody University of York
Jaime Delgadillo
Jaime Delgadillo University of Sheffield
Stephen Palmer
Stephen Palmer University of York
David Richards
David Richards University of Bristol
Scott B. Patten
Scott B. Patten University of Calgary
John P. A. Ioannidis
John P. A. Ioannidis Stanford University
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Peter Bower
Peter Bower University of Manchester
Peter A. Coventry
Peter A. Coventry University of York
Peter Butterworth
Peter Butterworth Australian National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways through online education. Many students are drawn to roles in mental health, counseling, social work, and psychology, where flexible learning options make a difference. Accreditation is crucial for quality and career prospects, so researching cacrep-accredited programs is a smart first step. These programs ensure that your counseling degree meets high professional standards and licensure requirements.

For those interested in relationship dynamics, pursuing an online master's degree in marriage and family therapy can lead to rewarding opportunities in both private and community settings. Psychology remains a versatile field, and students can find a variety of online psychology degrees that balance affordability, flexibility, and quality.

Social work is another growing area, with a strong focus on serving diverse populations. Those seeking accessible options can benefit from looking into the easiest msw programs to get into, helping them quickly launch careers that make a meaningful impact. Each of these pathways provides unique opportunities to contribute to society through both online study and hands-on practice.

Best Scientists Citing Dean McMillan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles