World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
71
Citations
37060
World Ranking
2109
National Ranking
1225

Neil S. Jacobson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil S. Jacobson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 156 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Neil S. Jacobson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil S. Jacobson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Neil S. Jacobson is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research contributions have been presented at academic conferences, particularly focusing on educational research.

Among the documented scholarly works, one significant paper is titled The Power and Possibilities of Positionality Statements: A Review of the American Educational Research Journal 2010-2018, published in 2020. This work appeared in the Proceedings of the 2020 AERA Annual Meeting.

Publication venues where Neil S. Jacobson has contributed include:

  • Proceedings of the 2020 AERA Annual Meeting

Their research topics, fields of study, subfields, and book publications are not extensively documented in the available data.

There are no recorded frequent co-authors or awards linked to their research profile thus far.

Best Publications

  • Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research.

    Unknown

  • Randomized trial of behavioral activation, cognitive therapy, and antidepressant medication in the acute treatment of adults with major depression.

    Sona Dimidjian;Steven D. Hollon;Keith S. Dobson;Karen B. Schmaling

  • Psychotherapy outcome research: Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance

    Neil S. Jacobson;William C. Follette;Dirk Revenstorf

  • Marital Therapy Strategies Based On Social Learning & Behavior Exchange Principles

    Neil S. Jacobson;Gayla Margolin

  • Behavioral Activation Treatment for Depression: Returning to Contextual Roots

    Neil S. Jacobson;Christopher R. Martell;Sona Dimidjian

  • Testing the integrity of a psychotherapy protocol: Assessment of adherence and competence.

    Jennifer Waltz;Michael E. Addis;Kelly Koerner;Neil S. Jacobson

  • Methods for defining and determining the clinical significance of treatment effects: description, application, and alternatives.

    Neil S. Jacobson;Lisa J. Roberts;Sara B. Berns;Joseph B. McGlinchey

  • Randomized trial of behavioral activation, cognitive therapy, and antidepressant medication in the prevention of relapse and recurrence in major depression.

    Keith S. Dobson;Steven D. Hollon;Sona Dimidjian;Karen B. Schmaling

  • Understanding infidelity: Correlates in a national random sample.

    David C. Atkins;Donald H. Baucom;Neil S. Jacobson

  • Power and violence: the relation between communication patterns, power discrepancies, and domestic violence.

    Julia C. Babcock;Jennifer Waltz;Neil S. Jacobson;John M. Gottman

  • The relationship between heart rate reactivity, emotionally aggressive behavior, and general violence in batterers.

    John M. Gottman;Neil S. Jacobson;Regina H. Rushe;Joann Wu Shortt

  • Affect, verbal content, and psychophysiology in the arguments of couples with a violent husband.

    Neil S. Jacobson;John M. Gottman;Jennifer Waltz;Regina Rushe

  • Clinical Handbook of Couple Therapy

    Alan S. Gurman;Neil S. Jacobson

  • Cognitive–behavioral treatment for depression: Relapse prevention.

    Eric Tomas Gortner;Jackie K. Gollan;Keith S. Dobson;Neil S. Jacobson

  • Research on couples and couple therapy: what do we know? Where are we going?

    Neil S. Jacobson;Michael E. Addis

  • Marital therapy as a treatment for depression.

    Neil S. Jacobson;Keith Dobson;Alan E. Fruzzetti;Karen B. Schmaling

  • Attachment, Emotional Regulation, and the Function of Marital Violence: Differences Between Secure, Preoccupied, and Dismissing Violent and Nonviolent Husbands

    Julia C. Babcock;Neil S. Jacobson;John M. Gottman;Timothy P. Yerington

  • Integrative behavioral couple therapy: an acceptance-based, promising new treatment for couple discord.

    Neil S. Jacobson;Andrew Christensen;Stacey E. Prince;James Cordova

  • Who (or What) Can Do Psychotherapy: The Status and Challenge of Nonprofessional Therapies

    Andrew Christensen;Neil S. Jacobson

  • When Men Batter Women: New Insights into Ending Abusive Relationships

    Neil S. Jacobson;John Mordechai Gottman

  • Variability in outcome and clinical significance of behavioral marital therapy: A reanalysis of outcome data.

    Neil S. Jacobson;William C. Follette;Dirk Revenstorf;Donald H. Baucom

Frequent Co-Authors

John M. Gottman
John M. Gottman University of Washington
Amy Holtzworth-Munroe
Amy Holtzworth-Munroe Indiana University
Andrew Christensen
Andrew Christensen University of California, Los Angeles
Mark A. Whisman
Mark A. Whisman University of Colorado Boulder
Gayla Margolin
Gayla Margolin University of Southern California
William C. Follette
William C. Follette University of Nevada Reno
Karen B. Schmaling
Karen B. Schmaling Washington State University
Michael E. Addis
Michael E. Addis Clark University
Julia C. Babcock
Julia C. Babcock University of Houston
Keith S. Dobson
Keith S. Dobson University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing psychology in the USA offers various online degree options that can lead to rewarding careers in mental health counseling and related fields. Aspiring professionals can choose from bachelor’s, master’s, or doctoral programs, many of which are available online and blend coursework with supervised field experiences.

A key issue for future counselors is understanding licensure and regional certification requirements, which can differ significantly across the country. For example, those interested in Jacksonville mental health counselor certification requirements must follow specific state guidelines. Similarly, the process differs in other cities—learn more about mental health counselor requirements in Jersey City, how to become a mental health counselor in Kansas City, or how to become a mental health counselor in Laredo.

Besides traditional counseling roles, graduates can also explore careers in research, clinical psychology, human resources, and community outreach. Carefully choosing a program accredited by recognized bodies will ensure eligibility for future certifications and broadens your career opportunities. Whether you are starting or advancing your psychology career, understanding these pathways and requirements is crucial for long-term success.

Best Scientists Citing Neil S. Jacobson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles