World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10733 10048 5612 5123 87 8355

Julia C. Babcock publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Julia C. Babcock between 1993 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Julia C. Babcock published across 32 years, from 1993 to 2024, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2004. 5 of the 96 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2004. 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 7 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 4 publications
1993 2024

96 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Julia C. Babcock: publications per year, 1993 to 2024
Year Publications
1993 2
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 2
2000 4
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 7
2005 4
2006 2
2007 2
2008 3
2009 6
2010 5
2011 3
2012 0
2013 5
2014 3
2015 4
2016 2
2017 5
2018 5
2019 7
2020 6
2021 5
2022 6
2023 1
2024 4
Total 96
Download as CSV

Julia C. Babcock publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia C. Babcock sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 87 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 87
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Julia C. Babcock D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia C. Babcock sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Julia C. Babcock is affiliated with the University of Houston in the United States and conducts research primarily within the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology. Their work focuses extensively on intimate partner and family violence, attachment and relationship dynamics, child abuse and trauma, as well as sexual assault and victimization studies.

Their recent publications include:

  • "Which battering interventions work? An updated Meta-analytic review of intimate partner violence treatment outcome research" (2024), published in Clinical Psychology Review
  • "Effects of Angry Rumination and Distraction in Intimate Partner Violent Men" (2020), published in Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Julia C. Babcock has also contributed to other significant works related to related fields, coauthoring with researchers such as Donald A. Godfrey, Caitlin M. Kehoe, Victoria E. Bennett, Adriana Bastardas-Albero, and Deanna L. Pollard.

Their research has appeared in several recurring publication venues, most notably:

  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • Journal of Family Violence
  • Psychology of Violence
  • International Journal of Urban Sciences
  • Clinical Psychology Review

Julia C. Babcock's work spans various subfields including health, clinical psychology, social psychology, sociology and political science, and general health professions. The primary topics explored in their research include:

  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Their papers have attracted attention in relevant academic communities, with citations notably accrued by works such as "Smart city as a social transition towards inclusive development through technology: a tale of four smart cities" (2022), published in the International Journal of Urban Sciences, and other research intersecting psychology and social sciences.

Best Publications

  • Does batterers' treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment.

    Julia C Babcock;Charles E Green;Chet Robie

  • Power and violence: the relation between communication patterns, power discrepancies, and domestic violence.

    Julia C. Babcock;Jennifer Waltz;Neil S. Jacobson;John M. Gottman

  • Affect, verbal content, and psychophysiology in the arguments of couples with a violent husband.

    Neil S. Jacobson;John M. Gottman;Jennifer Waltz;Regina Rushe

  • Attachment, Emotional Regulation, and the Function of Marital Violence: Differences Between Secure, Preoccupied, and Dismissing Violent and Nonviolent Husbands

    Julia C. Babcock;Neil S. Jacobson;John M. Gottman;Timothy P. Yerington

  • Toward a Typology of Abusive Women: Differences between Partner-Only and Generally Violent Women in the Use of Violence.

    Julia C. Babcock;Sarah A. Miller;Cheryl Siard

  • Testing a typology of batterers.

    Jennifer Waltz;Julia C. Babcock;Neil S. Jacobson;John M. Gottman

  • The Relationship Between Treatment, Incarceration, and Recidivism of Battering: A Program Evaluation of Seattle's Coordinated Community Response to Domestic Violence

    Julia Caroline Babcock;Ramalina Steiner

  • Proactive and Reactive Violence among Intimate Partner Violent Men Diagnosed with Antisocial and Borderline Personality Disorder

    Jody M. Ross;Julia C. Babcock

  • What situations induce intimate partner violence? A reliability and validity study of the Proximal Antecedents to Violent Episodes (PAVE) scale.

    Julia C. Babcock;Daniela M. Costa;Charles E. Green;Christopher I. Eckhardt;Christopher I. Eckhardt;Christopher I. Eckhardt

  • Domestic violence perpetrator programs: A proposal for evidence-based standards in the United States.

    Julia Caroline Babcock;Nicholas Armenti;Clare Cannon;Katie Lauve-Moon

  • The Effects of Hormonal Gender Affirmation Treatment on Mental Health in Female-to-Male Transsexuals

    Stacey L. Colton Meier Ma;Kara M. Fitzgerald Ma;Seth T. Pardo Ma;Julia Babcock

  • Partner Assaultive Men and the Stages and Processes of Change

    Christopher I. Eckhardt;Julia Babcock;Susan Homack

  • Psychophysiological profiles of batterers: autonomic emotional reactivity as it predicts the antisocial spectrum of behavior among intimate partner abusers.

    Julia C. Babcock;Charles E. Green;Sarah A. Webb;Timothy P. Yerington

  • Testosterone treatment and MMPI-2 improvement in transgender men: a prospective controlled study.

    Colton L Keo-Meier;Levi I Herman;Sari L Reisner;Seth T Pardo

  • Measures of Clinical Health among Female-to-Male Transgender Persons as a Function of Sexual Orientation

    S. Colton Meier;Seth T. Pardo;Christine Labuski;Julia Babcock

  • Intimate Partner Abuse and PTSD Symptomatology: Examining Mediators and Moderators of the Abuse-Trauma Link

    Julia C. Babcock;Ashley Roseman;Charles E. Green;Jody M. Ross

  • Battering and the Male Rejection of Influence from Women

    James Coan;John M. Gottman;Julia Babcock;Neil Jacobson

  • Romantic Relationships of Female-to-Male Trans Men: A Descriptive Study

    S. Colton Meier;Carla Sharp;Jared Michonski;Julia C. Babcock

  • Attachment as a Moderator Between Intimate Partner Violence and PTSD Symptoms.

    Shelby Scott;Julia C. Babcock

  • A second failure to replicate the Gottman et al. (1995) typology of men who abuse intimate partners...and possible reasons why.

    Julia C. Babcock;Charles E. Green;Sarah A. Webb;Katherine H. Graham

  • Testing a typology of batterers

    Julia C. Babcock;J. Waltz;Neil S. Jacobson;John M. Gottman

Frequent Co-Authors

John M. Gottman
John M. Gottman University of Washington
Neil S. Jacobson
Neil S. Jacobson University of Washington
Carla Sharp
Carla Sharp University of Houston
Christopher I. Eckhardt
Christopher I. Eckhardt Purdue University West Lafayette
Jeffrey Temple
Jeffrey Temple The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Amy Holtzworth-Munroe
Amy Holtzworth-Munroe Indiana University
Christopher M. Murphy
Christopher M. Murphy University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Matthew S. Stanford
Matthew S. Stanford Baylor University
Ernest N. Jouriles
Ernest N. Jouriles Southern Methodist University
Sari L. Reisner
Sari L. Reisner University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology often leads students to consider online degrees in areas like counseling and mental health. Many affordable and accredited online counseling programs are available, making advanced education more accessible for students across the USA.

When researching your options, affordability is a key issue. Depending on your location, you may find valuable programs such as the affordable counseling programs in Minnesota or discover opportunities through affordable counseling programs in Nashville.

Regional differences can impact tuition, program offerings, and licensure requirements. Students in the South can investigate the most affordable counseling degree programs in New Orleans. Those based in the Northeast may prefer to compare affordable counseling degrees in New Jersey.

No matter where you study, online psychology and counseling degrees can open pathways in school counseling, mental health services, and private practice. Researching accredited, affordable programs is the first step toward a rewarding career in helping others.

Best Scientists Citing Julia C. Babcock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles