World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthew S. Stanford

Matthew S. Stanford

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
19424
World Ranking
6521
National Ranking
3537

Matthew S. Stanford publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew S. Stanford sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 110 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Matthew S. Stanford D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew S. Stanford sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew S. Stanford is affiliated with Baylor University in the United States. Their academic profile shows a research trajectory within the broader scientific community, though specific fields of study, subfields, and main topics of work have not been detailed in the available data.

While there are no listed recent papers or publication venues associated with Matthew S. Stanford, the absence of this information suggests a limited publicly documented output in certain databases or a research focus outside high-volume publishing channels.

The data does not indicate frequent co-authors or any collaborative patterns, which might imply either independent research activities or that collaborations have not been cataloged extensively in accessible records.

Similarly, no book publications have been recorded under their name, which means their contributions may primarily be in forms other than authored books, such as articles, presentations, or other scholarly outputs not captured here.

There are no awards or honors documented, which suggests either a recent entry into academia or contributions that have not been recognized with formal accolades in the searchable records.

Overall, Matthew S. Stanford's profile reflects an academic presence affiliated with a notable institution, but specific details about research focus areas, collaborative networks, publication impact, or distinctions remain unspecified based on the current data.

Best Publications

  • Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale.

    Jim H. Patton;Matthew S. Stanford;Ernest S. Barratt

  • Fifty years of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale: An update and review

    Matthew S. Stanford;Charles Wayne Mathias;Donald M Dougherty;Sarah L. Lake

  • Neuropsychological and cognitive psychophysiological substrates of impulsive aggression

    Ernest S. Barratt;Matthew S. Stanford;Thomas A. Kent;Alan Felthous

  • Impulsive and premeditated aggression: a factor analysis of self-reported acts.

    Ernest S Barratt;Matthew S Stanford;Lynn Dowdy;Michele J Liebman

  • New tricks for an old measure: The development of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale–Brief (BIS-Brief).

    Lynne Steinberg;Carla Sharp;Matthew S. Stanford;Andra Teten Tharp

  • Characterizing aggressive behavior

    Matthew S. Stanford;Rebecca J. Houston;Charles W. Mathias;Nicole R. Villemarette-Pittman

  • The effects of phenytoin on impulsive and premeditated aggression: a controlled study

    Ernest S. Barratt;Matthew S. Stanford;Alan R. Felthous;Thomas A. Kent

  • Impulsiveness and risk-taking behavior: comparison of high-school and college students using the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale

    Matthew S. Stanford;Kevin W. Greve;Jill K. Boudreaux;Charles W. Mathias

  • Latent structure of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: A confirmatory factor analytic study.

    Kevin W. Greve;Timothy R. Stickle;Jeffrey M. Love;Kevin J. Bianchini

  • Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Barratt impulsiveness scale-11

    Hüseyin Güleç;Lut Tamam;Medine Yazıcı Güleç;Musa Turhan

  • Premeditated aggression: clinical assessment and cognitive psychophysiology

    Matthew S Stanford;Rebecca J Houston;Nicole R Villemarette-Pittman;Kevin W Greve

  • Personality and neurocognitive correlates of impulsive aggression in long-term survivors of severe traumatic brain injury.

    Kevin W. Greve;Elisabeth Sherwin;Matthew S. Stanford;Charles Mathias

  • Impulsivity and the multi-impulsive personality disorder

    Matthew S. Stanford;Ernest S. Barratt

  • Demon or disorder: A survey of attitudes toward mental illness in the Christian church

    Matthew S. Stanford

  • Irritability and impulsiveness: relationship to self-reported impulsive aggression

    Matthew S. Stanford;Kevin W. Greve;Theodore J. Dickens

  • Characterizing aggressive behavior in a forensic population.

    Tim R. Kockler;Matthew S. Stanford;Chad E. Nelson;J. Reid Meloy

  • Language and executive function in self-reported impulsive aggression

    Nicole R Villemarette-Pittman;Matthew S Stanford;Kevin W Greve

  • Neurobiological Correlates and Clinical Implications of Aggressive Subtypes

    Rebecca J. Houston;Matthew S. Stanford;Nicole R. Villemarette-Pittman;Sarah M. Conklin

  • A comparison of anticonvulsants in the treatment of impulsive aggression.

    Matthew S. Stanford;Laura E. Helfritz;Sarah M. Conklin;Nicole R. Villemarette-Pittman

  • Characterizing aggressive behavior with the Impulsive/Premeditated Aggression Scale among adolescents with conduct disorder.

    Charles W. Mathias;Matthew S. Stanford;Dawn M. Marsh;Paul J. Frick

Frequent Co-Authors

Ernest S. Barratt
Ernest S. Barratt The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Kevin W. Greve
Kevin W. Greve University of New Orleans
Charles W. Mathias
Charles W. Mathias The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Carla Sharp
Carla Sharp University of Houston
Nathan A. Kimbrel
Nathan A. Kimbrel Duke University
Donald M. Dougherty
Donald M. Dougherty The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Jennifer J. Vasterling
Jennifer J. Vasterling Boston University
Sanjay J. Mathew
Sanjay J. Mathew Baylor College of Medicine
Terence M. Keane
Terence M. Keane Boston University
Jean Endicott
Jean Endicott Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA often opens the door to a range of rewarding career paths, especially in fields closely related to human behavior and support. Pursuing a degree in social work is a popular pathway for psychology graduates, offering a direct route to impactful roles in community support, healthcare, and counseling.

For those considering further study, affordability is often a key concern. Many students seek out the most affordable social work degree programs in Iowa or explore affordable social work degrees in Indiana to balance educational aspirations with budget requirements.

There are also opportunities to pursue the cheapest social work programs in Kansas, making it easier to earn a respected degree without financial strain. Those based in Arkansas or nearby may want to consider the most affordable social work degree programs in Little Rock.

Exploring these online programs can complement a background in psychology and broaden your professional prospects, providing flexible and cost-effective pathways to careers in mental health, social care, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew S. Stanford

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles