World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
23868
World Ranking
6508
National Ranking
3525

Ernest S. Barratt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ernest S. Barratt sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 102 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ernest S. Barratt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ernest S. Barratt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ernest S. Barratt was affiliated with The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston in the United States. Their academic career included research activities linked to this institution.

Throughout their career, Barratt did not have publicly documented recent papers, co-authors, frequent publication venues, book publications, or specific fields and subfields of study registered in the available source data.

Similarly, there are no recorded main topics of work or awards listed in the accessible information.

The absence of detailed publication and research topic data limits a comprehensive outline of their scientific contributions or areas of expertise. However, the association with a medical branch university suggests involvement in biomedical or medical-related research or academic activities during their tenure.

Best Publications

  • Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale.

    Jim H. Patton;Matthew S. Stanford;Ernest S. Barratt

  • Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity

    F. Gerard Moeller;Ernest S. Barratt;Donald M. Dougherty;Joy M. Schmitz

  • Anxiety and Impulsiveness Related to Psychomotor Efficiency

    Ernest S. Barratt

  • FACTOR ANALYSIS OF SOME PSYCHOMETRIC MEASURES OF IMPULSIVENESS AND ANXIETY.

    Ernest S. Barratt

  • Neuropsychological and cognitive psychophysiological substrates of impulsive aggression

    Ernest S. Barratt;Matthew S. Stanford;Thomas A. Kent;Alan Felthous

  • Impulsiveness and aggression.

    Ernest S. Barratt

  • The impact of impulsivity on cocaine use and retention in treatment

    F.Gerard Moeller;Donald M. Dougherty;Ernest S. Barratt;Joy M. Schmitz

  • Psychometric properties of an Italian version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11) in nonclinical subjects

    Andrea Fossati;Antonella Di Ceglie;Elena Acquarini;Ernest S. Barratt

  • Impulsive and premeditated aggression: a factor analysis of self-reported acts.

    Ernest S Barratt;Matthew S Stanford;Lynn Dowdy;Michele J Liebman

  • The effects of phenytoin on impulsive and premeditated aggression: a controlled study

    Ernest S. Barratt;Matthew S. Stanford;Alan R. Felthous;Thomas A. Kent

  • Increased impulsivity in cocaine dependent subjects independent of antisocial personality disorder and aggression

    F Gerard Moeller;Donald M Dougherty;Ernest S Barratt;Victor Oderinde

  • Reduced Anterior Corpus Callosum White Matter Integrity is Related to Increased Impulsivity and Reduced Discriminability in Cocaine-Dependent Subjects: Diffusion Tensor Imaging

    Frederick Gerard Moeller;Khader M Hasan;Joel L Steinberg;Larry A Kramer

  • Trait impulsivity in patients with mood disorders

    M. A M Peluso;M. A M Peluso;M. A M Peluso;John P Hatch;D. C. Glahn;E. S. Monkul;E. S. Monkul

  • Impulsivity: Integrating cognitive, behavioral, biological, and environmental data.

    Ernest S. Barratt

  • The biological basis of impulsiveness: the significance of timing and rhythm disorders

    Ernest S. Barratt

  • Manic symptoms and impulsivity during bipolar depressive episodes.

    Alan C Swann;F Gerard Moeller;Joel L Steinberg;Laurie Schneider

  • Psychometric properties of an adolescent version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 for a sample of Italian high school students

    Andrea Fossati;Ernest S. Barratt;Elena Acquarini;Antonella Di Ceglie

  • Reduced Punishment Sensitivity in Neural Systems of Behavior Monitoring in Impulsive Individuals

    Geoffrey F. Potts;Mary Reeni M. George;Laura E. Martin;Ernest S. Barratt

  • Predicting borderline and antisocial personality disorder features in nonclinical subjects using measures of impulsivity and aggressiveness.

    Andrea Fossati;Ernest S. Barratt;Ilaria Carretta;Barbara Leonardi

  • Impulsivity and the multi-impulsive personality disorder

    Matthew S. Stanford;Ernest S. Barratt

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew S. Stanford
Matthew S. Stanford Baylor University
Donald M. Dougherty
Donald M. Dougherty The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Alan C. Swann
Alan C. Swann The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
F. Gerard Moeller
F. Gerard Moeller Virginia Commonwealth University
Andrea Fossati
Andrea Fossati Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Joel L. Steinberg
Joel L. Steinberg Virginia Commonwealth University
Charles W. Mathias
Charles W. Mathias The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Joy M. Schmitz
Joy M. Schmitz The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Cesare Maffei
Cesare Maffei Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Eddie Harmon-Jones
Eddie Harmon-Jones University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology as a career in the USA offers diverse opportunities. Many students are now choosing flexible online psychology programs in USA, making it easier to study from home and balance other commitments. Accredited online degrees can lead to roles in counseling, mental health, social work, or human resources.

For those in specific regions, there are standout options. For example, if you’re interested in the southern United States, check out the online psychology programs in Texas, which offer a variety of specializations and reputable universities. Similarly, those considering the Midwest should review online psychology degrees in Wisconsin for quality online learning paths.

If you plan to study in New York, exploring the best psychology degree programs ranking in Albany can help you select a program with a strong reputation and excellent career support. No matter where you study, online degrees in psychology open doors to varied career pathways in education, healthcare, business, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Ernest S. Barratt

Recently Published Articles