World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 107 6309 5933 3363 3118 565 37947

Jon E. Grant publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jon E. Grant between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jon E. Grant published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 23.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2011. 56 of the 709 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2011. 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 14 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 24 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 29 publications 2011: 47 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 35 publications 2015: 39 publications 2016: 47 publications 2017: 44 publications 2018: 34 publications 2019: 30 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 46 publications 2022: 34 publications 2023: 36 publications 2024: 41 publications 2025: 15 publications
1996 2025

709 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jon E. Grant: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 2
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 14
2002 14
2003 9
2004 11
2005 18
2006 16
2007 24
2008 22
2009 20
2010 29
2011 47
2012 25
2013 28
2014 35
2015 39
2016 47
2017 44
2018 34
2019 30
2020 28
2021 46
2022 34
2023 36
2024 41
2025 15
Total 709
Download as CSV

Jon E. Grant publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon E. Grant sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 565 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 565
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jon E. Grant D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon E. Grant sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541 107
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jon E. Grant is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States and contributes extensively to the field of psychology, with a focus on clinical psychology. Their work encompasses several subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, sociology and political science, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their research topics cover a range of areas with a particular emphasis on obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, gambling behavior and treatments, sexuality, behavior, and technology, autism spectrum disorder research, eating disorders and behaviors, body image and dysmorphia studies, and the impact of technology on adolescents.

Recent notable publications by Jon E. Grant include:

  • "Prevalence, gender correlates, and co-morbidity of trichotillomania" (2020, Psychiatry Research)
  • "Cognitive deficits in people who have recovered from COVID-19" (2021, EClinicalMedicine)
  • "Advances in problematic usage of the internet research - A narrative review by experts from the European network for problematic usage of the internet" (2022, Comprehensive Psychiatry)
  • "Problematic Internet use (PIU), personality profiles and emotion dysregulation in a cohort of young adults: trajectories from risky behaviors to addiction" (2020, Psychiatry Research)
  • "Associations between dimensions of behaviour, personality traits, and mental-health during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom" (2021, Nature Communications)

Jon E. Grant collaborates frequently with a core group of researchers. Frequent co-authors include Samuel R. Chamberlain, Konstantinos Ioannidis, Christine Löchner, Dan J. Stein, and Murat Yücel.

Grant's publication record is strongly tied to several academic journals with many contributions in Comprehensive Psychiatry, CNS Spectrums, Journal of Psychiatric Research, Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, and Psychiatry Research.

In addition to journal articles, Jon E. Grant has contributed to book publications, including a title published by Cambridge University Press titled "Impulse" in 2023.

Best Publications

  • Introduction to Behavioral Addictions

    Jon E. Grant;Marc N. Potenza;Aviv Weinstein;David A. Gorelick

  • Disorders of compulsivity: a common bias towards learning habits

    Valerie Voon;K Derbyshire;C Rück;MA Irvine

  • Risk factors for problematic gambling: a critical literature review.

    Agneta Johansson;Jon E. Grant;Suck Won Kim;Brian L. Odlaug

  • Double-blind naltrexone and placebo comparison study in the treatment of pathological gambling

    Suck Won Kim;Jon E Grant;David E Adson;Young Chul Shin

  • Cognitive deficits in people who have recovered from COVID-19.

    Adam Hampshire;William Trender;Samuel R Chamberlain;Samuel R Chamberlain;Amy E. Jolly

  • N-Acetylcysteine, a Glutamate Modulator, in the Treatment of Trichotillomania: A Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

    Jon E. Grant;Brian L. Odlaug;Suck Won Kim

  • The neurobiology of substance and behavioral addictions.

    Jon E. Grant;Judson A. Brewer;Marc N. Potenza

  • Impulse control disorders in adult psychiatric inpatients.

    Jon E. Grant;Laura Levine;Daniel Kim;Marc N. Potenza

  • Compulsive sexual behaviour disorder in the ICD-11.

    Shane W. Kraus;Richard B. Krueger;Peer Briken;Michael B. First

  • Impulse Control Disorders: Updated Review of Clinical Characteristics and Pharmacological Management

    Liana Schreiber;Brian L. Odlaug;Jon E. Grant

  • Surgical and Nonpsychiatric Medical Treatment of Patients With Body Dysmorphic Disorder

    Katharine A. Phillips;Jon Grant;Jason Siniscalchi;Ralph S. Albertini

  • Multicenter Investigation of the Opioid Antagonist Nalmefene in the Treatment of Pathological Gambling

    Jon E. Grant;Marc N. Potenza;Eric Hollander;Renee Cunningham-Williams

  • N-Acetyl Cysteine, a Glutamate-Modulating Agent, in the Treatment of Pathological Gambling: A Pilot Study

    Jon E. Grant;Suck Won Kim;Brian L. Odlaug

  • Atomoxetine Modulates Right Inferior Frontal Activation During Inhibitory Control: A Pharmacological Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Samuel R. Chamberlain;Adam Hampshire;Ulrich Müller;Katya Rubia

  • Emotion regulation and impulsivity in young adults

    Liana Renne Nelson Schreiber;Jon E. Grant;Brian L. Odlaug

  • Preliminary validity and reliability testing of a structured clinical interview for pathological gambling

    Jon E. Grant;Marvin A. Steinberg;Suck Won Kim;Bruce J. Rounsaville

  • Clinical spectrum of impulse control disorders in Parkinson's disease

    Daniel Weintraub;Anthony S. David;Andrew H. Evans;Jon E. Grant

  • A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the opiate antagonist naltrexone in the treatment of pathological gambling urges.

    Jon E. Grant;Suck Won Kim;Boyd K. Hartman

  • Demographic and clinical features of 131 adult pathological gamblers.

    Jon E. Grant;Suck Won Kim

  • Cognitive deficits in people who have recovered from COVID-19 relative to controls: An N=84,285 online study

    Adam Hampshire;William Trender;Samuel Chamberlain;Samuel Chamberlain;Amy Jolly

Frequent Co-Authors

Samuel R. Chamberlain
Samuel R. Chamberlain University of Southampton
Brian L. Odlaug
Brian L. Odlaug University of Minnesota
Suck Won Kim
Suck Won Kim University of Minnesota
Marc N. Potenza
Marc N. Potenza Yale University
Dan J. Stein
Dan J. Stein University of Cape Town
Naomi A. Fineberg
Naomi A. Fineberg University of Hertfordshire
Nancy J. Keuthen
Nancy J. Keuthen Harvard University
Leonardo F. Fontenelle
Leonardo F. Fontenelle Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Murat Yücel
Murat Yücel QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Steven A. Rasmussen
Steven A. Rasmussen Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical education in the USA opens doors to various online degrees and career paths in healthcare. For registered nurses aiming to advance, there are flexible adn to fnp bridge programs, which allow RNs with an associate degree to become Family Nurse Practitioners through online study.

Students interested in nutrition and wellness fields can explore an online nutrition degree. This path combines science, healthcare, and lifestyle education, preparing graduates for roles in hospitals, schools, and private practice.

For those looking to move into healthcare management, it’s crucial to choose programs with recognized credentials. Carefully review which online healthcare administration programs have cahme accreditation? since CAHME accreditation ensures high-quality standards and better career prospects.

Nurses aiming to complete a bachelor’s degree but requiring flexibility should consider online rn to bsn programs no clinicals. These programs provide advanced nursing knowledge without the need for additional clinical hours, ideal for working professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Jon E. Grant

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles