World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8485 7923 4542 4135 115 7952

Bradley C. Riemann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bradley C. Riemann between 1990 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bradley C. Riemann published across 35 years, from 1990 to 2024, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2017. 7 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2017. 1990: 3 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 3 publications
1990 2024

117 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bradley C. Riemann: publications per year, 1990 to 2024
Year Publications
1990 3
1991 0
1992 2
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 2
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 2
2004 2
2005 0
2006 2
2007 0
2008 2
2009 3
2010 5
2011 2
2012 4
2013 4
2014 3
2015 3
2016 3
2017 15
2018 6
2019 13
2020 7
2021 10
2022 14
2023 4
2024 3
Total 117
Download as CSV

Bradley C. Riemann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradley C. Riemann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 115
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Bradley C. Riemann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradley C. Riemann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bradley C. Riemann is affiliated with Memorial Hospital of South Bend in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Psychology, with significant contributions to Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience. Additional subfields include Social Psychology and Applied Psychology.

The scientist's work extensively covers several main topics within mental health research, including:

  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Mental Health Research Topics

Bradley C. Riemann has published actively in various academic journals, with the most frequent venues including:

  • Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy

Selected recent papers by Bradley C. Riemann illustrate the scope and focus of their research:

  • Comparing efficacy of telehealth to in-person mental health care in intensive-treatment-seeking adults, 2021, Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Severity benchmarks and contemporary clinical norms for the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R), 2020, Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
  • Intolerance of uncertainty and obsessive-compulsive disorder dimensions, 2021, Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • Efficacy of intensive CBT telehealth for obsessive-compulsive disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2021, Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
  • Clinical Presentation and Treatment Trajectory of Gender Minority Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, 2022, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Caitlin M. Pinciotti
  • Jonathan S. Abramowitz
  • Eric A. Storch
  • Chad T. Wetterneck
  • Samantha N. Hellberg

Best Publications

  • Assessment of obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions: development and evaluation of the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale.

    Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz;Brett J. Deacon;Bunmi O. Olatunji;Michael G. Wheaton

  • Selective processing of threat cues in posttraumatic stress disorder.

    Richard J. McNally;Susan P. Kaspi;Bradley C. Riemann;Sharon B. Zeitlin

  • Selective processing of threat cues in panic disorder

    Richard J. McNally;Bradley C. Riemann;Eunsil Kim

  • Co-morbid obsessive-compulsive disorder and depression: a Bayesian network approach.

    R J McNally;P Mair;B L Mugno;B C Riemann

  • Selective processing of threat cues in posttraumatic stress disorder.

    Unknown

  • Cognitive processing of personally relevant information

    Bradley C. Riemann;Richard J. McNally

  • Too much thinking about thinking?: Metacognitive differences in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Amy S. Janeck;John E. Calamari;Bradley C. Riemann;Susan K. Heffelfinger

  • Suppression of the emotional Stroop effect by increased anxiety in patients with social phobia

    Nader Amir;Richard J. Mcnally;Bradley C. Riemann;James Burns

  • The relationship between obsessive beliefs and symptom dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Michael G. Wheaton;Jonathan S. Abramowitz;Noah C. Berman;Bradley C. Riemann

  • Obsessive-compulsive disorder subtypes: an attempted replication and extension of a symptom-based taxonomy.

    John E Calamari;Pamela S Wiegartz;Bradley C Riemann;Robyn J Cohen

  • Cognitive processing of idiographic emotional information in panic disorder.

    Richard J. McNally;Nader Amir;Christine E. Louro;Brian M. Lukach

  • A network perspective on comorbid depression in adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Payton J. Jones;Patrick Mair;Bradley C. Riemann;Beth L. Mugno

  • Cognitive processing of emotional information in panic disorder.

    Richard J. McNally;Bradley C. Riemann;Christine E. Louro;Brian M. Lukach

  • Dysfunctional belief-based obsessive-compulsive disorder subgroups.

    John E. Calamari;Robyn J. Cohen;Neil A. Rector;Kate Szacun-Shimizu

  • Quality of life in obsessive-compulsive disorder: an evaluation of impairment and a preliminary analysis of the ameliorating effects of treatment.

    Melissa M. Norberg;John E. Calamari;Robyn J. Cohen;Bradley C. Riemann

  • Managing unwanted intrusive thoughts in obsessive-compulsive disorder: relative effectiveness of suppression, focused distraction, and acceptance.

    Sadia Najmi;Bradley C. Riemann;Daniel M. Wegner

  • Male clinical norms and sex differences on the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) and Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q).

    Kathryn E. Smith;Tyler B. Mason;Stuart Benjamin Murray;Scott Griffiths

  • Just to be certain: Confirming the factor structure of the intolerance of uncertainty scale in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Ryan J. Jacoby;Laura E. Fabricant;Rachel C. Leonard;Bradley C. Riemann

  • Factors associated with poor response in cognitive-behavioral therapy for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Eric A. Storch;Thröstur Björgvinsson;Bradley Riemann;Adam B. Lewin

  • Comparing efficacy of telehealth to in-person mental health care in intensive-treatment-seeking adults.

    Nyssa Z Bulkes;Kaley Davis;Brian Kay;Bradley C Riemann

  • Implicit memory bias for threat in panic disorder: application of the "white noise" paradigm.

    Nader Amir;Richard J. McNally;Bradley C. Riemann;Caroline Clements

  • Predictors of quality of life and functional impairment in Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder

    Ryan J. Jacoby;Rachel C. Leonard;Bradley C. Riemann;Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric A. Storch
Eric A. Storch Baylor College of Medicine
Richard J. McNally
Richard J. McNally Harvard University
Jonathan S. Abramowitz
Jonathan S. Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Bunmi O. Olatunji
Bunmi O. Olatunji Vanderbilt University
Martin E. Franklin
Martin E. Franklin University of Pennsylvania
Nader Amir
Nader Amir San Diego State University
Brett J. Deacon
Brett J. Deacon University of Wollongong
Christine A. Conelea
Christine A. Conelea University of Minnesota
Shawn P. Cahill
Shawn P. Cahill University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Thröstur Björgvinsson
Thröstur Björgvinsson Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in psychology careers continues to grow, online degrees are becoming a flexible option for aspiring professionals. Many students pursue graduate studies to qualify for counseling roles, choosing from programs that fit their budgets and career goals.

Affordability and location are key considerations. For example, those in Florida can explore affordable online counseling master's degrees in Fort Lauderdale. Georgia residents can look into affordable online counseling master's programs in Georgia, while opportunities are also available through affordable online counseling master's programs in Los Angeles.

For those based in the Northeast, several affordable online counseling master's programs in New York City offer flexible pathways into counseling, clinical, or school psychology. Online degrees often provide options for part-time study, internships, and various areas of specialization.

Graduates can pursue rewarding careers in mental health, counseling, therapy, or research. With the right program, students can balance work and study while preparing for licensure and advancement in this dynamic field.

Best Scientists Citing Bradley C. Riemann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles