World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
103
Citations
38374
World Ranking
548
National Ranking
341

Jonathan S. Abramowitz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan S. Abramowitz sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 370 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jonathan S. Abramowitz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan S. Abramowitz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan S. Abramowitz is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of psychology with a significant focus on clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and cognitive neuroscience. Additional areas of interest include psychiatry and mental health, and social psychology.

The scientist's work extensively covers multiple topics, with particular emphasis on obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes. Other research topics include eating disorders and behaviors, autism spectrum disorder research, body image and dysmorphia studies, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, and sexuality, behavior, and technology.

Jonathan S. Abramowitz has contributed to a range of recent academic papers, including:

  • Mental health and clinical psychological science in the time of COVID-19: Challenges, opportunities, and a call to action, 2020, American Psychologist
  • The therapeutic alliance in exposure therapy for anxiety-related disorders: A critical review, 2020, Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • Severity benchmarks and contemporary clinical norms for the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R), 2020, Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
  • The OCI-12: A syndromally valid modification of the obsessive-compulsive inventory-revised, 2021, Psychiatry Research
  • Intolerance of uncertainty and obsessive-compulsive disorder dimensions, 2021, Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jonathan S. Abramowitz include:

  • Dean McKay
  • Heidi J. Ojalehto
  • Eric A. Storch
  • Samantha N. Hellberg
  • Jennifer L. Buchholz

Publications by this scientist often appear in the following venues:

  • Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy

Jonathan S. Abramowitz has also authored book publications, including the title Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Adults, published by Hogrefe Publishing eBooks in 2025.

Best Publications

  • Robust dimensions of anxiety sensitivity: Development and initial validation of the anxiety sensitivity index-3

    Steven Taylor;Michael J. Zvolensky;Brian J. Cox;Brett Deacon

  • The Disgust Scale: Item Analysis, Factor Structure, and Suggestions for Refinement.

    Bunmi O. Olatunji;Nathan L. Williams;David F. Tolin;Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz

  • Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder

    Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz;Steven Taylor;Dean McKay

  • Assessment of obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions: development and evaluation of the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale.

    Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz;Brett J. Deacon;Bunmi O. Olatunji;Michael G. Wheaton

  • Paradoxical effects of thought suppression: a meta-analysis of controlled studies

    Jonathan S Abramowitz;David F Tolin;Gordon P Street

  • Effectiveness of psychological and pharmacological treatments for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a quantitative review.

    Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz

  • A critical evaluation of obsessive-compulsive disorder subtypes: symptoms versus mechanisms.

    Dean McKay;Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz;John E. Calamari;Michael Kyrios

  • Symptom presentation and outcome of cognitive-behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Jonathan S. Abramowitz;Martin E. Franklin;Stefanie A. Schwartz;Jami M. Furr

  • Mental health and clinical psychological science in the time of COVID-19: Challenges, opportunities, and a call to action.

    June Gruber;Mitchell J. Prinstein;Lee Anna Clark;Jonathan Rottenberg

  • Intolerance of uncertainty in obsessive-compulsive disorder

    David F. Tolin;Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz;Bartholomew D. Brigidi;Edna B. Foa

  • A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Stephen P. Whiteside;John D. Port;Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz

  • Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    Jonathan S. Abramowitz

  • Cognitive and behavioral treatments for anxiety disorders: A review of meta-analytic findings

    Brett J. Deacon;Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz

  • Psychological Predictors of Anxiety in Response to the H1N1 (Swine Flu) Pandemic

    Michael G. Wheaton;Jonathan S. Abramowitz;Noah C. Berman;Laura E. Fabricant

  • Effectiveness of exposure and ritual prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: Randomized compared with nonrandomized samples.

    Martin E. Franklin;Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz;Michael J. Kozak;Michael J. Kozak;Jill T. Levitt

  • Exposure Therapy for Anxiety: Principles and Practice

    Jonathan S. Abramowitz;Brett J. Deacon;Stephen P. H. Whiteside

  • Variants of Exposure and Response Prevention in the Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis

    Jonathan S. Abramowitz

  • The Psychological Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    Jonathan S Abramowitz

  • The neuropsychology of adult obsessive–compulsive disorder: A meta-analysis

    Amitai Abramovitch;Jonathan S. Abramowitz;Andrew Mittelman

  • Psychometric properties and construct validity of the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory--Revised: Replication and extension with a clinical sample.

    Jonathan S. Abramowitz;Brett J. Deacon

Frequent Co-Authors

Dean McKay
Dean McKay Fordham University
Brett J. Deacon
Brett J. Deacon University of Wollongong
Michael G. Wheaton
Michael G. Wheaton Barnard College
Steven Taylor
Steven Taylor University of British Columbia
David F. Tolin
David F. Tolin Yale University
Bunmi O. Olatunji
Bunmi O. Olatunji Vanderbilt University
Bradley C. Riemann
Bradley C. Riemann Memorial Hospital of South Bend
Eric A. Storch
Eric A. Storch Baylor College of Medicine
Michael P. Twohig
Michael P. Twohig Utah State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online degree in psychology opens diverse career opportunities, particularly in counseling and mental health services. Many graduates aim to become Licensed Professional Counselors (LPC), but it's crucial to understand that requirements vary by state.

For example, if you want to know how to get an lpc license in New Jersey, you’ll need to complete specific educational criteria, supervised clinical work, and state exams. Meanwhile, New Mexico licensed professional counselor requirements include a relevant graduate degree and clocking a required number of supervised hours, as well as passing the National Counselor Examination.

The licensing process can be different elsewhere; for example, lpc license requirements in New York require additional coursework and exams tailored to New York state law. In North Carolina, aspiring counselors should review the most up-to-date North Carolina lpc licensure requirements to ensure they meet all mandates.

Whether you’re interested in private practice or community counseling, understanding these pathways is essential. Online psychology degrees can prepare you with a flexible, accredited foundation to meet state licensure requirements and launch a successful career.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan S. Abramowitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles