World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 5973 5556 3237 2941 218 8249

Scott D. Lane publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott D. Lane between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott D. Lane published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2015. 29 of the 259 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2015. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 8 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 14 publications
1997 2025

259 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott D. Lane: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 8
1999 4
2000 5
2001 5
2002 5
2003 8
2004 7
2005 7
2006 10
2007 6
2008 3
2009 12
2010 6
2011 6
2012 7
2013 9
2014 9
2015 29
2016 3
2017 9
2018 10
2019 13
2020 11
2021 22
2022 8
2023 7
2024 15
2025 14
Total 259
Download as CSV

Scott D. Lane publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott D. Lane sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 218 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 218
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Scott D. Lane D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott D. Lane sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 48
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Scott D. Lane is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines with primary contributions in Medicine, Psychology, and Neuroscience. Within these broader fields, Lane's work focuses on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

Lane's research covers several topics including Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Suicide and Self-Harm Studies, Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes, Opioid Use Disorder Treatment, and Mental Health Treatment and Access.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Lane include:

  • Exenatide Adjunct to Nicotine Patch Facilitates Smoking Cessation and May Reduce Post-Cessation Weight Gain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial, 2021, Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  • Dose-response effects of d-amphetamine on effort-based decision-making and reinforcement learning, 2020, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Analysis of COVID-19 Infection and Mortality Among Patients With Psychiatric Disorders, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Trends and Seasonality of Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations for Suicidality Among Children and Adolescents in the US from 2016 to 2021, 2023, JAMA Network Open
  • A meta-analysis of tract-based spatial statistics studies examining white matter integrity in cocaine use disorder, 2020, Addiction Biology

Frequent co-authors contributing to Lane's research include Joy M. Schmitz, Heather E. Webber, Robert Suchting, Constanza de Dios, and Margaret C. Wardle. Collaboration with these researchers supports work spanning issues related to addiction, psychiatry, and behavioral neuroscience.

The scientist's publications have appeared predominantly in a set of specific venues, indicating focused dissemination of research results. The most frequent publication outlets include Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Biological Psychiatry, and JAMA Network Open.

Lane's publications primarily tackle complex questions related to substance use, psychiatric disorders, cognitive behavioral processes, and pharmacological interventions. The concentration of work in medicine and psychology reflects an interdisciplinary approach that combines clinical and experimental investigations to better understand mental health disorders and treatments.

Best Publications

  • P50, N100, and P200 sensory gating: Relationships with behavioral inhibition, attention, and working memory

    Marijn Lijffijt;Scott D. Lane;Stacey L. Meier;Nash N. Boutros

  • Choice impulsivity: Definitions, measurement issues, and clinical implications

    Kristen R. Hamilton;Marci R. Mitchell;Victoria C. Wing;Iris M. Balodis

  • Increased trait-like impulsivity and course of illness in bipolar disorder

    Alan C Swann;Marijn Lijffijt;Scott D Lane;Joel L Steinberg

  • Relationships among laboratory and psychometric measures of impulsivity: Implications in substance abuse and dependence

    Scott D. Lane;Don R. Cherek;Howard M. Rhoades;Cynthia J. Pietras

  • Selective activation of the nucleus accumbens during risk-taking decision making.

    Scott C. Matthews;Alan N. Simmons;Scott D. Lane;Martin P. Paulus;Martin P. Paulus

  • Acute marijuana effects on human risk taking

    Scott D Lane;Don R Cherek;Oleg V Tcheremissine;Lori M Lieving

  • Alcohol effects on human risk taking

    Scott D. Lane;Don R. Cherek;Cynthia J. Pietras;Oleg V. Tcheremissine

  • Trait impulsivity and response inhibition in antisocial personality disorder.

    Alan C. Swann;Marijn Lijffijt;Scott D. Lane;Joel L. Steinberg

  • Rapid-response impulsivity: definitions, measurement issues, and clinical implications.

    Kristen R. Hamilton;Andrew K. Littlefield;Noelle C. Anastasio;Kathryn A. Cunningham

  • Individual differences in drug abuse vulnerability: d-Amphetamine and sensation-seeking status

    Thomas H. Kelly;Glenn Robbins;Catherine A. Martin;Mark T. Fillmore

  • Relationship between impulsivity and decision making in cocaine dependence

    Kimberly L. Kjome;Scott D. Lane;Joy M. Schmitz;Charles Green

  • Neural substrates of time perception and impulsivity.

    Marc Wittmann;Alan N. Simmons;Alan N. Simmons;Taru Flagan;Scott D. Lane

  • Effects of chronic paroxetine administration on measures of aggressive and impulsive responses of adult males with a history of conduct disorder.

    Don R. Cherek;Scott D. Lane;Cynthia J. Pietras;Joel L. Steinberg

  • Relationship between attentional bias to cocaine-related stimuli and impulsivity in cocaine-dependent subjects.

    Shijing Liu;Scott D. Lane;Joy M. Schmitz;Andrew J. Waters

  • Effects of methylphenidate on impulsive choice in adult humans

    Cynthia J. Pietras;Cynthia J. Pietras;Don R. Cherek;Scott D. Lane;Oleg V. Tcheremissine

  • Performance of Cocaine Dependent Individuals and Controls on a Response Inhibition Task with Varying Levels of Difficulty

    Scott D. Lane;F. Gerard Moeller;Joel L. Steinberg;Matthew Buzby

  • Severity of bipolar disorder is associated with impairment of response inhibition

    Alan C. Swann;Marijn Lijffijt;Scott D. Lane;Joel L. Steinberg

  • Diffusion tensor imaging and decision making in cocaine dependence.

    Scott D. Lane;Joel L. Steinberg;Liangsuo Ma;Khader M. Hasan

  • Analysis of risk taking in adults with a history of high risk behavior

    Scott D. Lane;Don R. Cherek

  • Diminished P50, N100 and P200 auditory sensory gating in bipolar I disorder

    Marijn Lijffijt;F. Gerard Moeller;Nash N. Boutros;Joel L. Steinberg

  • An introduction to the Enterprise Risk Scorecard

    Joseph Calandro;Scott Lane

Frequent Co-Authors

Joy M. Schmitz
Joy M. Schmitz The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
F. Gerard Moeller
F. Gerard Moeller Virginia Commonwealth University
Don R. Cherek
Don R. Cherek The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Joel L. Steinberg
Joel L. Steinberg Virginia Commonwealth University
Ponnada A. Narayana
Ponnada A. Narayana The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Alan C. Swann
Alan C. Swann The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Thomas R. Kosten
Thomas R. Kosten Baylor College of Medicine
Martin P. Paulus
Martin P. Paulus Laureate Institute for Brain Research
Donald M. Dougherty
Donald M. Dougherty The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
David A. Nielsen
David A. Nielsen Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open doors to various rewarding careers, especially in mental health counseling. As online degrees become more prevalent, many programs now offer flexible paths to licensure and specialized roles. It’s important to understand that specific educational and licensing requirements can differ by location.

For example, if you’re considering a career as a counselor in California, you’ll want to review the Los Angeles mental health counselor education requirements. Similarly, requirements can vary greatly in other states. Those interested in working in Kentucky should examine the Louisville mental health counselor education requirements, while students aiming for Texas can look into how to become a mental health counselor in Lubbock. Wisconsin-based professionals should research Madison mental health counselor education requirements.

When choosing a program, be sure it aligns with your state’s licensure rules. Online degrees can offer an excellent foundation—but practical experience, supervised internships, and targeted coursework are crucial for career success in counseling fields across the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Scott D. Lane

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles