World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
5993
World Ranking
7647
National Ranking
4100

Don R. Cherek publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Don R. Cherek sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 143 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Don R. Cherek D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Don R. Cherek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Don R. Cherek was affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston in the United States. Their academic career included research activities primarily centered around topics and fields that remain unspecified in the available data.

Although detailed records of their publications, including recent papers and book publications, are not present, Don R. Cherek contributed to the scientific community through various avenues during their career.

No information is available about frequent co-authors or the publication venues where they regularly published research work.

There is no data provided regarding the specific main fields of study, subfields, or the main topics covered by their research. Similarly, there are no records of awards or recognitions associated with Don R. Cherek.

Overall, Don R. Cherek's professional profile is characterized by their institutional affiliation and the absence of further detailed bibliometric or research topic information in the given sources.

Best Publications

  • Impulsivity and history of drug dependence

    Terry J Allen;F.Gerard Moeller;Howard M Rhoades;Don R Cherek

  • Studies of violent and nonviolent male parolees: II. Laboratory and psychometric measurements of impulsivity

    Don R. Cherek;F. Gerard Moeller;Donald M. Dougherty;Howard Rhoades

  • Effects of smoking different doses of nicotine on human aggressive behavior

    Unknown

  • Relationships among laboratory and psychometric measures of impulsivity: Implications in substance abuse and dependence

    Scott D. Lane;Don R. Cherek;Howard M. Rhoades;Cynthia J. Pietras

  • Acute marijuana effects on human risk taking

    Scott D Lane;Don R Cherek;Oleg V Tcheremissine;Lori M Lieving

  • Alcohol effects on human risk taking

    Scott D. Lane;Don R. Cherek;Cynthia J. Pietras;Oleg V. Tcheremissine

  • Tryptophan depletion and aggressive responding in healthy males.

    F. G. Moeller;D. M. Dougherty;A. C. Swann;D. Collins

  • The effects of tryptophan depletion and loading on laboratory aggression in men: time course and a food-restricted control

    James M. Bjork;Donald M. Dougherty;F. Gerard Moeller;Don R. Cherek

  • Original articleStudies of violent and nonviolent male parolees: I. Laboratory and psychometric measurements of aggression

    Don R. Cherek;F. Gerard Moeller;William Schnapp;Donald M. Dougherty

  • Laboratory measures of aggressive responding in male parolees with violent and nonviolent histories

    Don R. Cherek;William Schnapp;F. Gerard Moeller;Donald M. Dougherty

  • Effects of alcohol on human aggressive behavior.

    D R Cherek;J L Steinberg;B R Manno

  • Effects of chronic paroxetine administration on measures of aggressive and impulsive responses of adult males with a history of conduct disorder.

    Don R. Cherek;Scott D. Lane;Cynthia J. Pietras;Joel L. Steinberg

  • Effects of methylphenidate on impulsive choice in adult humans

    Cynthia J. Pietras;Cynthia J. Pietras;Don R. Cherek;Scott D. Lane;Oleg V. Tcheremissine

  • Analysis of risk taking in adults with a history of high risk behavior

    Scott D. Lane;Don R. Cherek

  • Antisocial personality disorder and alcohol-induced aggression

    F. Gerard Moeller;Donald M. Dougherty;Scott D. Lane;Joel L. Steinberg

  • Response perseveration and adaptation in heavy marijuana-smoking adolescents

    Scott D. Lane;Don R. Cherek;Oleg V. Tcheremissine;Joel L. Steinberg

  • Laboratory and psychometric measurements of impulsivity among violent and nonviolent female parolees

    Don R Cherek;Scott D Lane

  • Effects of d,l-fenfluramine on aggressive and impulsive responding in adult males with a history of conduct disorder.

    Don R. Cherek;Scott D. Lane

  • Measurement of delay discounting using trial-by-trial consequences

    Scott D. Lane;Don R. Cherek;Cynthia J. Pietras;Oleg V. Tcheremissine

  • The effects of alcohol on the aggressive responding of women.

    Donald M. Dougherty;Don R. Cherek;Robert H. Bennett

  • Subjects with a history of drug dependence are more aggressive than subjects with no drug use history

    T J Allen;F G Moeller;H M Rhoades;D R Cherek

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott D. Lane
Scott D. Lane The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
F. Gerard Moeller
F. Gerard Moeller Virginia Commonwealth University
Donald M. Dougherty
Donald M. Dougherty The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Joel L. Steinberg
Joel L. Steinberg Virginia Commonwealth University
Howard M. Rhoades
Howard M. Rhoades The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
John Grabowski
John Grabowski University of Minnesota
Alan C. Swann
Alan C. Swann The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
James M. Bjork
James M. Bjork Virginia Commonwealth University
Jed E. Rose
Jed E. Rose Duke University
Joy M. Schmitz
Joy M. Schmitz The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider studying psychology in the USA, it's valuable to explore related online degrees and evolving career pathways. Psychology programs can differ significantly in their curriculum, specialization options, and career outcomes. For students in Florida, the most valuable psychology programs in Tampa provide strong academics with industry-focused skills.

If you're looking for degrees with the best career returns nationwide, researching the most valuable psychology programs in the US can help you select a program that offers both educational excellence and high earning potential after graduation.

Psychology and social work have closely connected fields and overlapping career paths. Many students also explore online options in social work. For those interested in flexible learning, the best online social work bachelor's programs in the US offer accredited degrees and practical experience. California residents may be interested in the best online social work degree programs in California that align with local job demands.

Exploring both psychology and social work programs—online or on-campus—can broaden your career prospects and help you find a specialization that’s right for you.

Best Scientists Citing Don R. Cherek