World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 5899 5483 3204 2909 197 10405

Amy M. Smith Slep publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amy M. Smith Slep between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amy M. Smith Slep published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2024. 34 of the 238 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2024. 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 16 publications
1995 2025

238 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amy M. Smith Slep: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 2
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 2
2000 2
2001 12
2002 1
2003 2
2004 4
2005 2
2006 9
2007 7
2008 3
2009 12
2010 6
2011 10
2012 13
2013 6
2014 13
2015 11
2016 10
2017 12
2018 6
2019 6
2020 16
2021 15
2022 13
2023 8
2024 18
2025 16
Total 238
Download as CSV

Amy M. Smith Slep publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy M. Smith Slep sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 197 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 197
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Amy M. Smith Slep D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy M. Smith Slep sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 48
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Amy M. Smith Slep is affiliated with New York University in the United States and has a significant publication record within psychology and social sciences. Their work primarily spans clinical psychology, health, general health professions, social psychology, sociology, and political science. The research contributions address a variety of topics, notably related to child abuse, trauma, intimate partner and family violence, attachment and relationship dynamics, and child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Key subfields of their research comprise:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Health
  • General Health Professions
  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

The principal topics covered in their publications are:

  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Amy M. Smith Slep include:

  • "Psychological maltreatment: An operationalized definition and path toward application," 2022, Child Abuse & Neglect
  • "Couples' Anger Dynamics during Conflict: Interpersonal Anger Regulation, Relationship Satisfaction, and Intimate Partner Violence," 2021, Family Process
  • "Systematic Review of the Military Career Impact of Mental Health Evaluation and Treatment," 2021, Military Medicine (authored by Richard E. Heyman but listed within their recent papers)
  • "Exploring Mental Health Professionals' Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence-Related Training: Results From a Global Survey," 2020, Journal of Interpersonal Violence (authored by Samantha C. Burns but listed within their recent papers)
  • "High sensitivity and specificity screening for clinically significant intimate partner violence," 2020, Journal of Family Psychology (authored by Richard E. Heyman but listed within their recent papers)

Frequent collaborators by coauthorship include:

  • Richard E. Heyman
  • Michael F. Lorber
  • Danielle M. Mitnick
  • Kimberly A. Rhoades
  • Alison L. Drew

Common publication venues where Amy M. Smith Slep has appeared are:

  • Military Medicine
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • Journal of Family Psychology
  • Military Psychology

Best Publications

  • Risk factors for male-to-female partner physical abuse

    Julie A. Schumacher;Shari R. Feldbau-Kohn;Amy M. Smith Slep;Richard E. Heyman

  • Risk factors for child physical abuse

    Danielle A Black;Richard E Heyman;Amy M Smith Slep

  • Changes in relationship satisfaction across the transition to parenthood: a meta-analysis.

    Danielle M. Mitnick;Richard E. Heyman;Amy M. Smith Slep

  • A dyadic longitudinal model of adolescent dating aggression.

    K. Daniel O'Leary;Amy M. Smith Slep

  • Multivariate models of men's and women's partner aggression

    K. Daniel O'Leary;Amy M. Smith Slep;Susan G. O'Leary

  • Parent and partner violence in families with young children: rates, patterns, and connections.

    Amy M. Smith Slep;Susan G. O'Leary

  • Risk factors for child neglect

    Julie A Schumacher;Amy M.Smith Slep;Richard E Heyman

  • Gender differences in dating aggression among multiethnic high school students.

    K. Daniel O'Leary;Amy M. Smith Slep;Sarah Avery-Leaf;Michele Cascardi

  • Child abuse in the context of domestic violence: prevalence, explanations, and practice implications.

    Ernest N Jouriles;Renee McDonald;Amy M Smith Slep;Richard E Heyman

  • The effects of maternal attributions on parenting : An experimental analysis

    Amy M. Smith Slep;Susan G. O'Leary

  • Do Child Abuse and Interparental Violence Lead to Adulthood Family Violence

    Richard E. Heyman;Amy M. Smith Slep

  • Risk factors for child sexual abuse

    Danielle A Black;Richard E Heyman;Amy M Smith Slep

  • Predicting inept discipline: The role of parental depressive symptoms, anger, and attributions.

    Debbie W. Leung;Amy M. Smith Slep

  • Factor structure and convergent validity of the Conflict Tactics Scale in high school students.

    Michele Cascardi;Sarah Avery-Leaf;K. Daniel O'Leary;Amy M. Smith Slep

  • A longitudinal study of mothers' overreactive discipline and toddlers' externalizing behavior.

    Susan G. O'Leary;Amy M. Smith Slep;M. Jamila Reid

  • Risk factors for child psychological abuse

    Danielle A Black;Amy M Smith Slep;Richard E Heyman

  • Prevention of Partner Violence by Focusing on Behaviors of Both Young Males and Females

    K. Daniel O’Leary;Amy M. Smith Slep

  • Multivariate models of mothers' and fathers' aggression toward their children.

    Amy M. Smith Slep;Susan G. O'Leary

  • Examining partner and child abuse: are we ready for a more integrated approach to family violence?

    Amy M.Smith Smith Slep;Susan G. O'Leary

  • Risk factors for male-to-female partner psychological abuse

    Julie A. Schumacher;Amy M. Smith Slep;Richard E. Heyman

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard E. Heyman
Richard E. Heyman New York University
Susan G. O'Leary
Susan G. O'Leary Stony Brook University
Douglas K. Snyder
Douglas K. Snyder Texas A&M University
K. Daniel O'Leary
K. Daniel O'Leary Stony Brook University
Geoffrey M. Reed
Geoffrey M. Reed Columbia University
Steven R. H. Beach
Steven R. H. Beach University of Georgia
Marianne Z. Wamboldt
Marianne Z. Wamboldt Children's Hospital Colorado
David Reiss
David Reiss Yale University
Martin E. Franklin
Martin E. Franklin University of Pennsylvania
Nadine J. Kaslow
Nadine J. Kaslow Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up a range of online degrees and flexible career pathways, particularly in mental health counseling and therapy. Many students consider becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), a role that is in high demand across the country.

Understanding regional certification and education requirements is essential. For example, if you are interested in practicing in Colorado, learn about the Aurora mft certification requirements. Meanwhile, those looking at opportunities in Texas can explore the mft requirements in Austin.

Requirements can vary greatly from state to state. In California, aspiring therapists should familiarize themselves with the mft requirements in Bakersfield. If you are considering practice on the East Coast, review the Baltimore mft education requirements to ensure you meet all local standards.

Whether you choose clinical counseling or specialized therapy fields, researching each state’s requirements will help you stay on track for licensure and a rewarding psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Amy M. Smith Slep

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles