World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 63 3064 2821 1744 1570 194 21459

Geoffrey M. Reed publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Geoffrey M. Reed between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Geoffrey M. Reed published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2019. 18 of the 229 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2019. 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 7 publications
1991 2025

229 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Geoffrey M. Reed: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 3
1992 1
1993 1
1994 3
1995 0
1996 2
1997 0
1998 2
1999 1
2000 2
2001 5
2002 5
2003 3
2004 17
2005 1
2006 2
2007 2
2008 2
2009 3
2010 2
2011 11
2012 6
2013 8
2014 7
2015 8
2016 14
2017 16
2018 13
2019 26
2020 11
2021 16
2022 12
2023 6
2024 11
2025 7
Total 229
Download as CSV

Geoffrey M. Reed publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoffrey M. Reed sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 194 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 194
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Geoffrey M. Reed D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoffrey M. Reed sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248 63
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Geoffrey M. Reed is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and medicine, with a particular focus on clinical psychology, philosophy, social psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and epidemiology. Their research spans a range of topics that include mental health and psychiatry, mental health treatment and access, personality disorders and psychopathology, sexuality, behavior and technology, LGBTQ health, identity and policy, schizophrenia research and treatment, and chronic disease management strategies.

Reed has co-authored numerous papers with frequent collaborators such as Tahilia J. Rebello, Rebeca Robles, Jared W. Keeley, Dan J. Stein, and Cary S. Kogan. Their work appears regularly in several prominent publication venues, including World Psychiatry, Journal of Affective Disorders, Journal of Behavioral Addictions, Consortium Psychiatricum, and BMC Medicine.

Their recent publications include the following:

  • "Emerging experience with selected new categories in the ICD-11: complex PTSD, prolonged grief disorder, gaming disorder, and compulsive sexual behaviour disorder" (2022), published in World Psychiatry
  • "An organization- and category-level comparison of diagnostic requirements for mental disorders in ICD-11 and DSM-5" (2021), published in World Psychiatry
  • "Mental, behavioral and neurodevelopmental disorders in the ICD-11: an international perspective on key changes and controversies" (2020), published in BMC Medicine
  • "Estimating the Prevalence of Sexual Dysfunction Using the New ICD-11 Guidelines" (2020), published in Deutsches Ärzteblatt international
  • "The Evolution of the Female Sexual Disorder/Dysfunction Definitions, Nomenclature, and Classifications: A Review of DSM, ICSM, ISSWSH, and ICD" (2020), published in Sexual Medicine Reviews

In addition to journal publications, Reed has contributed to academic literature through book publications, including a title published by Cambridge University Press named Making Sense of the ICD-11 (2023).

Their work predominantly engages with the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), exploring diagnostic criteria and classification of mental and sexual health disorders. This focus highlights their involvement in updating and refining psychiatric nosology and classification systems aligned with global health standards.

Among professional recognitions, Geoffrey M. Reed was awarded the status of Fellow by the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2011.

Best Publications

  • Psychological resources, positive illusions, and health.

    Shelley E. Taylor;Margaret E. Kemeny;Geoffrey M. Reed;Julienne E. Bower

  • Psychological Testing and Psychological Assessment: A Review of Evidence and Issues.

    Gregory J. Meyer;Stephen E. Finn;Lorraine D. Eyde;Gary G. Kay

  • Diagnosis and classification of disorders specifically associated with stress: proposals for ICD-11.

    Andreas Maercker;Chris R Brewin;Richard A Bryant;Marylene Cloitre

  • Classification, assessment, prevalence, and effect of personality disorder

    Peter Tyrer;Geoffrey M Reed;Mike J Crawford

  • Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: Validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies ☆

    Spencer C. Evans;Michael C. Roberts;Jared W. Keeley;Jennifer B. Blossom

  • Innovations and changes in the ICD-11 classification of mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders

    Geoffrey M. Reed;Michael B. First;Cary S. Kogan;Steven E. Hyman

  • Three Approaches to Understanding and Classifying Mental Disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC):

    Lee Anna Clark;Bruce Cuthbert;Roberto Lewis-Fernández;William E. Narrow

  • Proposals for mental disorders specifically associated with stress in the International Classification of Diseases-11

    Andreas Maercker;Chris R Brewin;Richard A Bryant;Marylene Cloitre

  • A Review of Current Evidence Regarding the ICD-11 Proposals for Diagnosing PTSD and Complex PTSD

    Chris R. Brewin;Marylène Cloitre;Philip Hyland;Mark Shevlin

  • Intellectual developmental disorders: towards a new name, definition and framework for "mental retardation/intellectual disability" in ICD-11.

    Luis Salvador Carulla;Geoffrey M. Reed;Leila M. Vaez-Azizi;Sally-Ann Cooper

  • Disorders related to sexuality and gender identity in the ICD-11: revising the ICD-10 classification based on current scientific evidence, best clinical practices, and human rights considerations.

    Geoffrey M. Reed;Jack Drescher;Richard B. Krueger;Elham Atalla

  • Compulsive sexual behaviour disorder in the ICD-11.

    Shane W. Kraus;Richard B. Krueger;Peer Briken;Michael B. First

  • The WPA-WHO Global Survey of Psychiatrists’ Attitudes Towards Mental Disorders Classification

    Geoffrey M. Reed;João Mendonça Correia;Patricia Esparza;Shekhar Saxena

  • Self-generated feelings of control and adjustment to physical illness.

    Shelley E. Taylor;Vicki S. Helgeson;Geoffrey M. Reed;Laurie A. Skokan

  • Realistic acceptance as a predictor of decreased survival time in gay men with AIDS.

    Geoffrey M. Reed;Margaret E. Kemeny;Shelley E. Taylor;Hui-Ying J. Wang

  • The development of the ICD-11 Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines for Mental and Behavioural Disorders

    Michael B First;Geoffrey M Reed;Steven E Hyman;Shekhar Saxena

  • Toward ICD-11: Improving the Clinical Utility of WHO's International Classification of Mental Disorders

    Geoffrey M. Reed

  • The rationale for the reclassification of personality disorder in the 11th revision of the international classification of diseases (ICD‐11).

    Peter Tyrer;Mike Crawford;Roger Mulder;Roger Blashfield

  • Proposed declassification of disease categories related to sexual orientation in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11)

    Susan D Cochran;Jack Drescher;Eszter Kismödi;Alain Giami

  • Mental, behavioral and neurodevelopmental disorders in the ICD-11: an international perspective on key changes and controversies.

    Dan J. Stein;Peter Szatmari;Wolfgang Gaebel;Michael Berk

  • Operationalizing the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in clinical settings

    Geoffrey M. Reed;Jayne B. Lux;Lynn F. Bufka;Christine Trask

Frequent Co-Authors

Shekhar Saxena
Shekhar Saxena Harvard University
Oye Gureje
Oye Gureje University of Ibadan
Michael C. Roberts
Michael C. Roberts University of Kansas
Dan J. Stein
Dan J. Stein University of Cape Town
María Elena Medina-Mora
María Elena Medina-Mora National Autonomous University of Mexico
Spencer C. Evans
Spencer C. Evans University of Miami
Mario Maj
Mario Maj University of Naples Federico II
José Luis Ayuso-Mateos
José Luis Ayuso-Mateos Autonomous University of Madrid
Peer Briken
Peer Briken Universität Hamburg
Michael B. First
Michael B. First Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens up diverse educational and professional pathways. Many students are interested in social work, which often requires specific degrees and licenses that can vary by state. For example, if you want to learn about the degree needed to be a social worker in Maine, you’ll discover that both bachelor’s and master’s degrees in social work are important, especially for higher-level roles.

Similarly, requirements for starting a career in social work can be quite specific in different states. The Maryland education requirements for social workers highlight the importance of accredited programs and supervised experience. If you’re considering Massachusetts, check the social worker degree requirements in Massachusetts for both entry and advanced practice.

Thinking about working in Michigan? State-specific guidelines include a focus on education and clinical hours, as outlined in the social worker degree requirements in Michigan. Online psychology programs can help you fulfill many of these prerequisites, offering flexibility as you prepare for a meaningful career in social work or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Geoffrey M. Reed

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles