World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 54 3975 3654 279 257 112 10166

Rita Prager publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rita Prager between 1982 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rita Prager published across 42 years, from 1982 to 2023, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2011. 1 of the 125 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2011. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
1982 2023

125 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rita Prager: publications per year, 1982 to 2023
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 2
1994 1
1995 4
1996 2
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 5
2001 5
2002 9
2003 6
2004 7
2005 9
2006 5
2007 5
2008 0
2009 7
2010 7
2011 11
2012 4
2013 6
2014 3
2015 6
2016 2
2017 6
2018 4
2019 1
2020 1
2021 0
2022 0
2023 1
Total 125
Download as CSV

Rita Prager publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rita Prager sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 105–114 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 112 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190 112
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Rita Prager D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rita Prager sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134 54
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Rita Prager is affiliated with the Robert Koch Institute in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on agricultural and biological sciences, with a particular emphasis on food science and biotechnology. The main topics covered by their work include Listeria monocytogenes in food safety, food safety and hygiene, as well as the epidemiology of Salmonella and Campylobacter.

One of their recent papers, published in 2020 in the journal Emerging Microbes & Infections, is titled "Backtracking and forward checking of human listeriosis clusters identified a multiclonal outbreak linked to Listeria monocytogenes in meat products of a single producer." This publication has received citations, indicating its interaction within the scientific community.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Rita Prager include:

  • Stefanie Lüth
  • Sven Halbedel
  • Bettina Rosner
  • Hendrik Wilking
  • Alexandra Holzer

The scientist's publications are predominantly found in the venue Emerging Microbes & Infections, signaling a focus on infectious diseases related to food safety.

Rita Prager's fields of study reflect the interdisciplinary nature of their research, bridging biological sciences and practical applications in food safety, hygiene, and microbial epidemiology. Their work contributes to understanding contamination outbreaks and the molecular biology of foodborne pathogens.

Best Publications

  • Epidemic Profile of Shiga-Toxin–Producing Escherichia coli O104:H4 Outbreak in Germany

    Christina Frank;Dirk Werber;Jakob P Cramer;Mona Askar

  • Prospective Genomic Characterization of the German Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O104:H4 Outbreak by Rapid Next Generation Sequencing Technology

    Alexander Mellmann;Dag Harmsen;Craig A. Cummings;Emily B. Zentz

  • Salmonella enterica Serotype Typhimurium and Its Host-Adapted Variants

    Wolfgang Rabsch;Helene L. Andrews;Robert A. Kingsley;Rita Prager

  • Detection and characterization of broad-host-range plasmids in environmental bacteria by PCR.

    A Götz;R Pukall;E Smit;E Tietze

  • Shiga Toxin Gene Loss and Transfer In Vitro and In Vivo during Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O26 Infection in Humans

    Martina Bielaszewska;Rita Prager;Robin Köck;Alexander Mellmann

  • Pork contaminated with Salmonella enterica serovar 4,[5],12:i:-, an emerging health risk for humans.

    Elisabeth Hauser;Erhard Tietze;Reiner Helmuth;Ernst Junker

  • International outbreak of Salmonella Oranienburg due to German chocolate

    Dirk Werber;Johannes Dreesman;Fabian Feil;Ulrich van Treeck

  • Large and ongoing outbreak of haemolytic uraemic syndrome, Germany, May 2011

    C Frank;M S Faber;M Askar;M Askar;H Bernard

  • Verotoxinogenic Citrobacter freundii associated with severe gastroenteritis and cases of haemolytic uraemic syndrome in a nursery school: green butter as the infection source.

    H. Tschäpe;R. Prager;W. Streckel;A. Fruth

  • Salmonella host cell invasion emerged by acquisition of a mosaic of separate genetic elements, including Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI1), SPI5, and sopE2.

    Susanne Mirold;Kristin Ehrbar;Astrid Weissmüller;Rita Prager

  • Large listeriosis outbreak linked to cheese made from pasteurized milk, Germany, 2006-2007.

    Judith Koch;Regine Dworak;Rita Prager;Biserka Becker

  • Update: Multinational listeriosis outbreak due to ‘Quargel’, a sour milk curd cheese, caused by two different L. monocytogenes serotype 1/2a strains, 2009-2010

    Rainer Fretz;J. Pichler;U. Sagel;P. Much

  • Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in Human Infection: In Vivo Evolution of a Bacterial Pathogen

    Alexander Mellmann;Martina Bielaszewska;Lothar B. Zimmerhackl;Rita Prager

  • A multistate outbreak of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O26:H11 infections in Germany, detected by molecular subtyping surveillance.

    Dirk Werber;Angelika Fruth;Almut Liesegang;Martina Littmann

  • EHEC/EAEC O104:H4 strain linked with the 2011 German outbreak of haemolytic uremic syndrome enters into the viable but non-culturable state in response to various stresses and resuscitates upon stress relief.

    Philipp Aurass;Rita Prager;Antje Flieger

  • Whole genome sequencing as a tool to investigate a cluster of seven cases of listeriosis in Austria and Germany, 2011-2013.

    D. Schmid;F. Allerberger;S. Huhulescu;A. Pietzka

  • Characterization of cytolethal distending toxin genes and expression in shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains of non-O157 serogroups.

    Martina Bielaszewska;Marina Fell;Lilo Greune;Rita Prager

  • Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O26:H11/H−: A New Virulent Clone Emerges in Europe

    Martina Bielaszewska;Alexander Mellmann;Stefan Bletz;Wenlan Zhang

  • Listeriosis outbreak caused by acid curd cheese Quargel , Austria and Germany 2009.

    Rainer Fretz;U. Sagel;W. Ruppitsch;A. T. Pietzka

  • Strong association between shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 and virulence genes stx2 and eae as possible explanation for predominance of serogroup O157 in patients with haemolytic uraemic syndrome.

    Dirk Werber;Angelika Fruth;U Buchholz;Rita Prager

  • Phenotypic and Genotypic Analyses of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O145 Strains from Patients in Germany

    Anne-Katharina Sonntag;Rita Prager;Martina Bielaszewska;Wenlan Zhang

Frequent Co-Authors

Helmut Tschäpe
Helmut Tschäpe Robert Koch Institute
Angelika Fruth
Angelika Fruth Robert Koch Institute
Wolfgang Rabsch
Wolfgang Rabsch Robert Koch Institute
Helge Karch
Helge Karch University of Münster
Martina Bielaszewska
Martina Bielaszewska University of Münster
Alexander Mellmann
Alexander Mellmann University of Münster
Franz Allerberger
Franz Allerberger University of Innsbruck
Burkhard Malorny
Burkhard Malorny Federal Institute for Risk Assessment
Alexander W. Friedrich
Alexander W. Friedrich University Medical Center Groningen
Manfred P. Dierich
Manfred P. Dierich Innsbruck Medical University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers related to Microbiology often leads students to consider complementary fields in health and science. For those interested in public health, mph online programs with easy admission requirements provide an accessible way to advance your education without overly stringent entry barriers.

Career opportunities like becoming a child life specialist salary can be appealing for microbiology graduates seeking to support pediatric patient wellness in clinical settings. Understanding the financial outlook of this role can help in making informed career decisions.

Additionally, there are growing options for those with diverse backgrounds, including individuals with past convictions. Programs listed under online degrees for felons demonstrate that higher education is increasingly accessible to many, opening doors to professional pathways previously thought difficult to attain.

For those interested in holistic patient care, training as a Functional Medicine Nurse Practitioner is another promising route. Researching the functional medicine nurse salary helps gauge the financial viability of this in-demand healthcare specialty.

Best Scientists Citing Rita Prager

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles