World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
58
Citations
11897
World Ranking
3666
National Ranking
1754

Wolfram Schulte publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfram Schulte sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 234 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Wolfram Schulte D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfram Schulte sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wolfram Schulte is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States. Their research activity focuses primarily on the field of Computer Science, with contributions in subfields such as Software and Artificial Intelligence.

The scientist's work frequently covers topics related to Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques and Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning.

Wolfram Schulte has one documented publication available:

  • Tool Support for the Interactive Derivation of Formally Correct Functional Programs, 2020, published in TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Wolfram Schulte include:

  • Walter Guttmann
  • Helmuth Partsch
  • Ton Vullinghs

The publication venues commonly associated with Schulte's work include:

  • TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology)

Overall, the scientist's research integrates practical aspects of software development with adaptive learning technologies, reflecting interdisciplinary engagement within computer science.

Best Publications

  • The spec# programming system: an overview

    Mike Barnett;K. Rustan M. Leino;Wolfram Schulte

  • VCC: A Practical System for Verifying Concurrent C

    Ernie Cohen;Markus Dahlweid;Mark Hillebrand;Dirk Leinenbach

  • Verification of object-oriented programs with invariants

    Michael Barnett;Robert DeLine;Manuel Fähndrich;K. Rustan M. Leino

  • Symstra: a framework for generating object-oriented unit tests using symbolic execution

    Tao Xie;Darko Marinov;Wolfram Schulte;David Notkin

  • The design of a task parallel library

    Daan Leijen;Wolfram Schulte;Sebastian Burckhardt

  • Fitness-guided path exploration in dynamic symbolic execution

    Tao Xie;Nikolai Tillmann;Jonathan de Halleux;Wolfram Schulte

  • Parameterized unit tests

    Nikolai Tillmann;Wolfram Schulte

  • Generating finite state machines from abstract state machines

    Wolfgang Grieskamp;Yuri Gurevich;Wolfram Schulte;Margus Veanes

  • Model-based testing of object-oriented reactive systems with spec explorer

    Margus Veanes;Colin Campbell;Wolfgang Grieskamp;Wolfram Schulte

  • Specification and verification: the Spec# experience

    Mike Barnett;Manuel Fähndrich;K. Rustan M. Leino;Peter Müller

  • Approximating finite domains in symbolic state exploration

    Nikolai Tillmann;Wolfgang Grieskamp;Wolfram Schulte

  • An approach for effective design space exploration

    Eunsuk Kang;Ethan Jackson;Wolfram Schulte

  • Controllable combinatorial coverage in grammar-based testing

    Ralf Lämmel;Wolfram Schulte

  • Semantic essence of AsmL

    Yuri Gurevich;Benjamin Rossman;Wolfram Schulte

  • A Programmer Friendly Modular Definition of the Semantics of Java

    Egon Börger;Wolfram Schulte

  • SPUR: a trace-based JIT compiler for CIL

    Michael Bebenita;Florian Brandner;Manuel Fahndrich;Francesco Logozzo

  • A programming model for concurrent object-oriented programs

    Bart Jacobs;Frank Piessens;Jan Smans;K. Rustan M. Leino

  • Automating Software Testing Using Program Analysis

    P. Godefroid;P. de Halleux;A.V. Nori;S.K. Rajamani

  • Model-Based Software Testing and Analysis with C#

    Jonathan Jacky;Margus Veanes;Colin Campbell;Wolfram Schulte

  • FM 2011: Formal Methods

    Michael Butler;Wolfram Schulte

  • Semantic essence of AsmL: Extended abstract

    Yuri Gurevich;Benjamin Rossman;Wolfram Schulte

Frequent Co-Authors

Nikolai Tillmann
Nikolai Tillmann Facebook (United States)
Margus Veanes
Margus Veanes Microsoft (United States)
Bart Jacobs
Bart Jacobs Radboud University
Yuri Gurevich
Yuri Gurevich University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
K. Rustan M. Leino
K. Rustan M. Leino Amazon Web Services
Manuel Fähndrich
Manuel Fähndrich Google (United States)
Tao Xie
Tao Xie Peking University
Nikolaj Bjørner
Nikolaj Bjørner Microsoft (United States)
Egon Börger
Egon Börger University of Pisa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens up a wide range of education and career options, especially with the flexibility of online programs. For students concerned about past academic performance, there are online schools that accept low gpa, making computer science and other technical degrees more accessible.

If you're looking to fast-track your studies, consider enrolling in an accelerated computer science degree online. These programs help you complete your education quickly and enter the workforce with in-demand technical skills.

Computer science knowledge also complements fields like environmental science and engineering. For example, discover what you can do with an environmental science degree, or explore the impact of technology in sustainability through environmental engineering degree programs.

Whether you’re interested in a career in tech, sustainability, or research, these pathways offer affordable, flexible options for advancing your education and career from anywhere in the world.

Best Scientists Citing Wolfram Schulte

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles