World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
K. Rustan M. Leino

K. Rustan M. Leino

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
57
Citations
16529
World Ranking
3774
National Ranking
1803

K. Rustan M. Leino publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where K. Rustan M. Leino sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 147 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

K. Rustan M. Leino D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where K. Rustan M. Leino sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - ACM Fellow For contributions to making program verification accessible and practical.

Overview

K. Rustan M. Leino is affiliated with Amazon Web Services in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Computer Science with a significant concentration on Artificial Intelligence.

Their work spans several subfields, including:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Software
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics

Several main topics characterize their research contributions:

  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge

Leino's publication record includes papers in the venue arXiv (Cornell University), with 11 publications there. Among their recent papers are:

  • "Globally-Robust Neural Networks," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Self-Correcting Neural Networks For Safe Classification," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Relaxing Local Robustness," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent coauthors with whom they have collaborated include:

  • Matt Fredrikson
  • Corina S. Păsăreanu
  • Ravi Mangal
  • Aymeric Fromherz
  • Bryan Parno

Their recognized contributions were acknowledged with the ACM Fellow award in 2016 for contributions to making program verification accessible and practical.

Best Publications

  • Extended static checking for Java

    Cormac Flanagan;K. Rustan M. Leino;Mark Lillibridge;Greg Nelson

  • The spec# programming system: an overview

    Mike Barnett;K. Rustan M. Leino;Wolfram Schulte

  • Boogie: a modular reusable verifier for object-oriented programs

    Mike Barnett;Bor-Yuh Evan Chang;Robert DeLine;Bart Jacobs

  • Dafny: an automatic program verifier for functional correctness

    K. Rustan M. Leino

  • An overview of JML tools and applications

    Lilian Burdy;Yoonsik Cheon;David R. Cok;Michael D. Ernst

  • Extended static checking

    K. Rustan M. Leino

  • Houdini, an Annotation Assistant for ESC/Java

    Cormac Flanagan;K. Rustan M. Leino

  • Verification of object-oriented programs with invariants

    Michael Barnett;Robert DeLine;Manuel Fähndrich;K. Rustan M. Leino

  • Boogie: a modular reusable verifier for object-oriented programs

    Mike Barnett;Bor-Yuh Evan Chang;Robert Deline;Bart Jacobs

  • Object invariants in dynamic contexts

    K. Rustan M. Leino;Peter Müller

  • Weakest-precondition of unstructured programs

    Mike Barnett;K. Rustan M. Leino

  • Declaring and checking non-null types in an object-oriented language

    Manuel Fähndrich;K. Rustan M. Leino

  • A logic of object-oriented programs

    Martín Abadi;K. Rustan M. Leino

  • A semantic approach to secure information flow

    Rajeev Joshi;K. Rustan M. Leino

  • JML (poster session): notations and tools supporting detailed design in Java

    Gary T. Leavens;Clyde Ruby;K. Rustan M. Leino;Erik Poll

  • Behavioral interface specification languages

    John Hatcliff;Gary T. Leavens;K. Rustan M. Leino;Peter Müller

  • Specification and verification: the Spec# experience

    Mike Barnett;Manuel Fähndrich;K. Rustan M. Leino;Peter Müller

  • Data groups: specifying the modification of extended state

    K. Rustan M. Leino

  • Efficient weakest preconditions

    K. Rustan M. Leino

  • A Basis for Verifying Multi-threaded Programs

    K. Rustan Leino;Peter Müller

  • BoogiePL: A typed procedural language for checking object-oriented programs

    Robert DeLine;K. Rustan M. Leino

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Müller
Peter Müller ETH Zurich
Wolfram Schulte
Wolfram Schulte Microsoft (United States)
Bart Jacobs
Bart Jacobs Radboud University
Gary T. Leavens
Gary T. Leavens University of Central Florida
Robert DeLine
Robert DeLine Microsoft (United States)
Cormac Flanagan
Cormac Flanagan University of California, Santa Cruz
Manuel Fähndrich
Manuel Fähndrich Google (United States)
Parosh Aziz Abdulla
Parosh Aziz Abdulla Uppsala University
Mark Lillibridge
Mark Lillibridge Meta Platforms, Inc.

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Computer Science can open diverse career pathways. Many students consider interdisciplinary options like a criminal justice degree price to understand how technology is used in criminal investigations and cybersecurity roles. Others may pivot into fields such as accounting, where understanding data and automation is critical. If you are concerned about affordability, exploring accounting degree cost can help you compare programs that fit your budget.

For those seeking advanced roles in tech, a cheap online masters degree in data science offers specialized training in AI, analytics, and big data. Additionally, the rise of project management tools and Building Information Modeling (BIM) has made tech-savvy professionals highly valuable in construction. Consider an online construction management degree for a career at the intersection of technology, engineering, and business.

With the flexibility of online learning, you can tailor your educational path to meet your career goals and budget, while developing highly sought-after digital skills.

Best Scientists Citing K. Rustan M. Leino

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles