World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
50
Citations
9180
World Ranking
5651
National Ranking
2573

Nikolai Tillmann publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nikolai Tillmann sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 180 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Nikolai Tillmann D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nikolai Tillmann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nikolai Tillmann is a researcher affiliated with Facebook in the United States. Their academic contributions include work published in recognized venues associated with institutions such as the Graz University of Technology.

Tillmann has collaborated with other researchers, notably with Yuri Gurevich, indicating a collaborative approach to advancing their research topics.

Their documented publication record includes the following paper:

  • Partial Updates: Exploration, 2020, TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology)

Tillmann's scientific output has been cited by other researchers, suggesting engagement with the academic community; for example, the 2020 publication has received 30 citations.

Frequent publication venues featured in their profile include:

  • TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology)

Coauthors who have worked extensively with Tillmann include:

  • Yuri Gurevich

Best Publications

  • Pex: white box test generation for .NET

    Nikolai Tillmann;Jonathan De Halleux

  • Symbolic execution for software testing in practice: preliminary assessment

    Cristian Cadar;Patrice Godefroid;Sarfraz Khurshid;Corina S. Pasareanu

  • Demand-driven compositional symbolic execution

    Saswat Anand;Patrice Godefroid;Nikolai Tillmann

  • Fitness-guided path exploration in dynamic symbolic execution

    Tao Xie;Nikolai Tillmann;Jonathan de Halleux;Wolfram Schulte

  • Parameterized unit tests

    Nikolai Tillmann;Wolfram Schulte

  • DySy: dynamic symbolic execution for invariant inference

    Christoph Csallner;Nikolai Tillmann;Yannis Smaragdakis

  • Model-based testing of object-oriented reactive systems with spec explorer

    Margus Veanes;Colin Campbell;Wolfgang Grieskamp;Wolfram Schulte

  • Path Feasibility Analysis for String-Manipulating Programs

    Nikolaj Bjørner;Nikolai Tillmann;Andrei Voronkov

  • Approximating finite domains in symbolic state exploration

    Nikolai Tillmann;Wolfgang Grieskamp;Wolfram Schulte

  • Rex: Symbolic Regular Expression Explorer

    Margus Veanes;Peli de Halleux;Nikolai Tillmann

  • A model-to-implementation mapping tool for automated model-based GUI testing

    Ana C. R. Paiva;João C. P. Faria;Nikolai Tillmann;Raul A. M. Vidal

  • SPUR: a trace-based JIT compiler for CIL

    Michael Bebenita;Florian Brandner;Manuel Fahndrich;Francesco Logozzo

  • Automating Software Testing Using Program Analysis

    P. Godefroid;P. de Halleux;A.V. Nori;S.K. Rajamani

  • TouchDevelop: programming cloud-connected mobile devices via touchscreen

    Nikolai Tillmann;Michal Moskal;Jonathan de Halleux;Manuel Fahndrich

  • Test generation via Dynamic Symbolic Execution for mutation testing

    Lingming Zhang;Tao Xie;Lu Zhang;Nikolai Tillmann

  • Teaching and learning programming and software engineering via interactive gaming

    Nikolai Tillmann;Jonathan de Halleux;Tao Xie;Sumit Gulwani

  • MSeqGen: object-oriented unit-test generation via mining source code

    Suresh Thummalapenta;Tao Xie;Nikolai Tillmann;Jonathan de Halleux

  • Unit tests reloaded: parameterized unit testing with symbolic execution

    N. Tillmann;W. Schulte

  • It's alive! continuous feedback in UI programming

    Sebastian Burckhardt;Manuel Fahndrich;Peli de Halleux;Sean McDirmid

  • Synthesizing method sequences for high-coverage testing

    Suresh Thummalapenta;Tao Xie;Nikolai Tillmann;Jonathan de Halleux

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolfram Schulte
Wolfram Schulte Microsoft (United States)
Tao Xie
Tao Xie Peking University
Margus Veanes
Margus Veanes Microsoft (United States)
Manuel Fähndrich
Manuel Fähndrich Google (United States)
Thomas Ball
Thomas Ball Microsoft (United States)
Yuri Gurevich
Yuri Gurevich University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Nikolaj Bjørner
Nikolaj Bjørner Microsoft (United States)
Patrice Godefroid
Patrice Godefroid Microsoft (United States)
Sumit Gulwani
Sumit Gulwani Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science online opens doors to a range of flexible and accessible learning options. Many aspiring students seek affordable online colleges that allow them to pursue a quality education without breaking the bank. Budget-friendly programs can make it possible to earn a degree even with financial constraints.

Admission requirements can sometimes be a barrier, but there are online colleges that accept low gpa, creating more inclusive pathways for students with diverse academic backgrounds. This opens up opportunities for more learners to kick start their careers in tech.

Consider a 2-year computer science degree online for a faster track into the workforce. Accelerated programs are ideal for career changers or those eager to build skills quickly.

Graduates aren’t limited to programming roles. As seen in other fields, such as what can you do with an environmental science degree guides, a computer science background prepares you for diverse job prospects—from data analysis to systems management and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Nikolai Tillmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles