World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
74
Citations
39562
World Ranking
1826
National Ranking
1075

Felicia Pratto publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Felicia Pratto sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 197 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Felicia Pratto D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Felicia Pratto sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Felicia Pratto is affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Social Sciences, with notable contributions in subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Gender Studies, and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management.

The main topics addressed in their work include Social and Intergroup Psychology, Cultural Differences and Values, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Gender Diversity and Inequality, Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence, Racial and Ethnic Identity Research, and Social and Cultural Dynamics.

Recent publications by Felicia Pratto feature a variety of themes centered on social dominance, political engagement, and intergroup relations. Selected papers include:

  • "Group dominance in hierarchy-attenuating and hierarchy-enhancing organizations: The role of social dominance orientation, need for cognitive closure, and power tactics in a person-environment (mis)fit perspective." (2020, Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice)
  • "From Social Dominance Orientation to Political Engagement: The Role of Group Status and Shared Beliefs in Politics Across Multiple Contexts" (2021, Political Psychology)
  • "How people higher on social dominance orientation deal with hierarchy-attenuating institutions: the person-environment (mis)fit perspective in the grammar of hierarchies" (2022, Current Psychology)
  • "When empathy predicts greater support for intergroup violence: Counter-dominance against the U.S. in Syria and Lebanon" (2023, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology)
  • "As Clear as Black and White: Racially Disparate Concerns Over Career Progression for Remote Workers Across Racial Faultlines" (2022, Business & Society)

Felicia Pratto has published frequently in several venues, notably:

  • Political Psychology
  • Frontiers in Social Psychology
  • PLoS ONE
  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology

The scientist has collaborated multiple times with a cohort of co-authors, reflecting research partnerships in related domains. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Aleksandra Rusowicz
  • Shana Levin
  • Antonio Aiello
  • Floriana Gargiulo
  • Alessio Tesi

Best Publications

  • Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression

    Jim Sidanius;Felicia Pratto

  • Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes.

    Felicia Pratto;James Sidanius;Lisa M. Stallworth;Bertram F. Malle

  • Automatic Vigilance: The Attention-Grabbing Power of Negative Social Information

    Felicia Pratto;Oliver P. John

  • The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect.

    John A. Bargh;Shelly Chaiken;Rajen Govender;Felicia Pratto

  • Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward

    Felicia Pratto;Jim Sidanius;Shana Levin

  • The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale.

    Arnold K. Ho;Jim Sidanius;Nour Sami Kteily;Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington

  • Social Dominance Theory: Its Agenda and Method

    Jim Sidanius;Felicia Pratto;Colette Van Laar;Shana Levin

  • Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication : A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance ?

    Jim Sidanius;Felicia Pratto;Lawrence Bobo

  • The Irony of Harmony Intergroup Contact Can Produce False Expectations for Equality

    Tamar Saguy;Nicole Tausch;John F. Dovidio;Felicia Pratto

  • Social Dominance Orientation and the Political Psychology of Gender: A Case of Invariance?

    Jim Sidanius;Felicia Pratto;Lawrence Bobo

  • The Interface Between Ethnic and National Attachment: Ethnic Pluralism or Ethnic Dominance?

    Jim Sidanius;Seymour Feshbach;Shana Levin;Felicia Pratto

  • Social Dominance Orientation Revisiting the Structure and Function of a Variable Predicting Social and Political Attitudes

    Arnold K. Ho;Jim Sidanius;Felicia Pratto;Shana Levin

  • Social dominance orientation, anti-egalitarianism and the political psychology of gender: An extension and cross-cultural replication.

    Jim Sidanius;Shana Levin;James Liu;Felicia Pratto

  • Social Dominance Orientation and the Legitimization of Inequality Across Cultures

    Felicia Pratto;James H. Liu;Shana Levin;Jim Sidanius

  • The gender gap: Differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation

    Felicia Pratto;Lisa M. Stallworth;Jim Sidanius

  • The inevitability of oppression and the dynamics of social dominance.

    Jim Sidanius;Felicia Pratto

  • In-Group Identification, Social Dominance Orientation, and Differential Intergroup Social Allocation

    Jim Sidanius;Felicia Pratto;Michael Mitchell

  • Beyond Contact: Intergroup Contact in the Context of Power Relations

    Tamar Saguy;John F. Dovidio;Felicia Pratto

  • Individual construct accessibility and perceptual selection

    John A Bargh;Felicia Pratto

  • The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach.

    Felicia Pratto;Lisa M. Stallworth;Jim Sidanius;Bret Siers

  • INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES Racism, Conservatism, Affirmative Action, and Intellectual Sophistication: A Matter of Principled Conservatism or Group Dominance?

    Jim Sidanius;Felicia Pratto;Lawrence Bobo

Frequent Co-Authors

Jim Sidanius
Jim Sidanius Harvard University
Shana Levin
Shana Levin Claremont McKenna College
Nour Kteily
Nour Kteily Northwestern University
James H. Liu
James H. Liu Massey University
Tamar Saguy
Tamar Saguy Reichman University
John F. Dovidio
John F. Dovidio Yale University
Kevin Durrheim
Kevin Durrheim University of Johannesburg
Antonio Pierro
Antonio Pierro Sapienza University of Rome
Orla T. Muldoon
Orla T. Muldoon University of Limerick
John A. Bargh
John A. Bargh Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology opens the door to a wide array of online degrees and career pathways. Many students choose to specialize in areas such as counseling, clinical psychology, or substance abuse counseling. Each path has its own unique educational requirements and certification standards, which can vary depending on your location.

For those interested in addiction and recovery work, there are clear steps to follow in different cities. Discover the Long Beach substance abuse counselors education requirements to understand local certification and degree needs. Similarly, you can learn about how to become a substance abuse counselor in Los Angeles, which outlines specific coursework and fieldwork expectations.

Regions across the country have their own requirements. Insights on Louisville substance abuse counselors education requirements are crucial for those planning to practice in Kentucky. Meanwhile, students considering Texas should review the pathway for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Lubbock.

Online degree programs can provide strong flexibility and regional relevance, making it easier to meet these local requirements and launch your career in psychology or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Felicia Pratto

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles