World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
10309
World Ranking
6610
National Ranking
6

Kevin Durrheim publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin Durrheim sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 131 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Kevin Durrheim D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin Durrheim sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kevin Durrheim is affiliated with the University of Johannesburg in South Africa and has contributed to research primarily within the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology. Their work spans diverse topics, with a notable focus on social and intergroup psychology as well as cultural differences and values.

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • "It's not just 'us' versus 'them': Moving beyond binary perspectives on intergroup processes," 2020, European Review of Social Psychology
  • "Using word embeddings to investigate cultural biases," 2022, British Journal of Social Psychology
  • "Conversational Silencing of Racism in Psychological Science: Toward Decolonization in Practice," 2023, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Everyday dehumanization: Negative contact, humiliation, and the lived experience of being treated as 'less than human'," 2022, British Journal of Social Psychology
  • "Speaker landscapes: machine learning opens a window on the everyday language of opinion," 2023, Communication Methods and Measures

Durrheim's frequent co-authors include:

  • Maria Schuld
  • Amy Jo Murray
  • Michael Quayle
  • Kevin Igwe
  • John Dixon

The scientist commonly publishes in journals such as:

  • British Journal of Social Psychology
  • European Review of Social Psychology
  • Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
  • Scientific Reports
  • EPJ Data Science

Their research incorporates subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, General Health Professions, and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Key topics covered in their work are:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Topic Modeling

Kevin Durrheim's work often explores the dynamics of social interactions, cultural biases, and the intersection of language and social influence using methods that include computational approaches like machine learning. This interdisciplinary approach reflects their engagement across both psychological and sociological dimensions of human behavior and social structure.

Best Publications

  • Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings

    Richard A. Klein;Michelangelo Vianello;Fred Hasselman;Byron G. Adams

  • Displacing place‐identity: A discursive approach to locating self and other

    John Dixon;Kevin Durrheim

  • Beyond the optimal contact strategy: a reality check for the contact hypothesis.

    John Dixon;Kevin Durrheim;Colin Tredoux

  • Beyond prejudice: are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution?

    John Dixon;Mark Levine;Steve Reicher;Kevin Durrheim

  • Dislocating identity: Desegregation and the transformation of place

    John A. Dixon;Kevin Durrheim

  • Intergroup Contact and Attitudes Toward the Principle and Practice of Racial Equality

    John Dixon;Kevin Durrheim;Colin Tredoux

  • Contact and the ecology of racial division: Some varieties of informal segregation

    John Dixon;Kevin Durrheim

  • Social Dominance in Context and in Individuals: Contextual Moderation of Robust Effects of Social Dominance Orientation in 15 Languages and 20 Countries

    Felicia Pratto;Atilla Çidam;Andrew L. Stewart;Fouad Bou Zeineddine

  • “Let Them Eat Harmony” Prejudice-Reduction Strategies and Attitudes of Historically Disadvantaged Groups

    John Dixon;Linda R. Tropp;Kevin Durrheim;Colin Tredoux

  • Race Trouble: Race, Identity and Inequality in Post-Apartheid South Africa

    Kevin Durrheim;Xoliswa Mtose;Lyndsay Brown

  • Validation of the HIV/AIDS Stigma Instrument - PLWA (HASI-P)

    William L Holzemer;Leana R Uys;Maureen L Chirwa;Minrie Greeff

  • A paradox of integration? Interracial contact, prejudice reduction and perceptions of racial discrimination

    John Dixon;Kevin Durrheim;Colin Tredoux;Linda Tropp

  • Racial Encounter: The Social Psychology of Contact and Desegregation

    Kevin Durrheim;John A. Dixon

  • The role of place and metaphor in racial exclusion : South Africa's beaches as sites of shifting racialization

    Kevin Durrheim;John A. Dixon

  • Foucauldian feminism: The implications of governmentality

    Catriona Macleod;Kevin Durrheim

  • Social Constructionism, Discourse, and Psychology

    Kevin Durrheim

  • The Effectiveness of the Vignette Methodology: A Comparison of Written and Video Vignettes in Eliciting Responses about Date Rape

    Michelle Sleed;Kevin Durrheim;Anita Kriel;Vernon Solomon

  • Attitudes in the Fiber of Everyday Life: The Discourse of Racial Evaluation and the Lived Experience of Desegregation.

    Kevin Durrheim;John Dixon

  • Evaluation of a health setting-based stigma intervention in five African countries.

    Leana Uys;Maureen Chirwa;Thecla Kohi;Minrie Greeff

  • Different Kinds of Knowing Generating Qualitative Data Through Mobile Interviewing

    Lyndsay Brown;Kevin Durrheim

  • Racial Contact and Change in South Africa

    Kevin Durrheim;John Dixon

  • Studying talk and embodied practices : toward a psychology of materiality of ‘race relations’.

    Kevin Durrheim;John Dixon

Frequent Co-Authors

Colin Tredoux
Colin Tredoux University of Cape Town
Felicia Pratto
Felicia Pratto University of Connecticut
James H. Liu
James H. Liu Massey University
Orla T. Muldoon
Orla T. Muldoon University of Limerick
Joseph T. Mullan
Joseph T. Mullan University of California, San Francisco
Linda Richter
Linda Richter University of the Witwatersrand
Anita L. Stewart
Anita L. Stewart University of California, San Francisco
Linda R. Tropp
Linda R. Tropp University of Massachusetts Amherst
Eva G. T. Green
Eva G. T. Green University of Lausanne
Aleksandra Cichocka
Aleksandra Cichocka University of Kent

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the field of psychology opens up a variety of online degree and career opportunities. Many students pursuing psychology are also interested in counseling, due to the overlap in skills and the growing demand for mental health professionals. The flexibility of online programs makes it easier than ever to earn a relevant degree while balancing personal and professional commitments.

If you’re considering a specialized path, researching top counseling degree programs in Iowa or the best counseling program rankings in Illinois can provide insights on accreditation, curriculum, and career placement rates. Students on the West Coast can look into top counseling degree programs in Los Angeles for further choices in urban or diverse settings.

For those on the East Coast, exploring the best college counseling programs in Maryland can help you identify programs that match your location and career goals. Each region offers unique strengths and networking opportunities, shaping your learning and future career pathways.

As the need for qualified mental health professionals grows, these programs provide a strong foundation for licensure, clinical practice, or further specialization in related psychology fields.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin Durrheim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles