World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
6836
World Ranking
8539
National Ranking
90

Tamar Saguy publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tamar Saguy sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 127 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Tamar Saguy D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tamar Saguy sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tamar Saguy is an academic affiliated with Reichman University in Israel, with a research focus spanning social sciences and psychology. Their work engages deeply with aspects of social and intergroup psychology, particularly emphasizing cultural differences, moral and emotional judgment, and gender studies.

The primary fields of study in which Tamar Saguy publishes include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Subfields of emphasis encompass sociology and political science, social psychology, gender studies, cognitive neuroscience, and political science and international relations.

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Gender Studies
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Political Science and International Relations

The scientist's notable research topics cover social and intergroup psychology, cultural differences and values, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, and several gender-related themes such as gender diversity, inequality, roles, identity studies, and gender politics and representation. They have also contributed to research on terrorism, counterterrorism, and political violence.

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Gender Politics and Representation
  • Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

Tamar Saguy's recent publications include:

  • "The gender-binary cycle: the perpetual relations between a biological-essentialist view of gender, gender ideology, and gender-labelling and sorting" (2021), published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • "Disrupting the system constructively: Testing the effectiveness of nonnormative nonviolent collective action." (2020), published in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • "Views of sexual assault following #MeToo: The role of gender and individual differences" (2020), published in Personality and Individual Differences
  • "Protest movements involving limited violence can sometimes be effective: Evidence from the 2020 BlackLivesMatter protests" (2022), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "With or without you: The paradoxical role of identification in predicting joint and ingroup collective action in intergroup conflict" (2020), published in European Journal of Social Psychology

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Eran Halperin (13 publications)
  • Eric Shuman (9 publications)
  • Martijn van Zomeren (7 publications)
  • Michal Reifen-Tagar (5 publications)
  • Hanna Szekeres (4 publications)

Tamar Saguy has published regularly in key academic venues such as Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, European Journal of Social Psychology, British Journal of Social Psychology, and PLoS ONE.

  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • European Journal of Social Psychology
  • British Journal of Social Psychology
  • PLoS ONE

Best Publications

  • Commonality and the Complexity of “We”: Social Attitudes and Social Change:

    John F. Dovidio;Samuel L. Gaertner;Tamar Saguy

  • The Irony of Harmony Intergroup Contact Can Produce False Expectations for Equality

    Tamar Saguy;Nicole Tausch;John F. Dovidio;Felicia Pratto

  • Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity

    John F. Dovidio;Samuel L. Gaertner;Tamar Saguy

  • Beyond Contact: Intergroup Contact in the Context of Power Relations

    Tamar Saguy;John F. Dovidio;Felicia Pratto

  • Believing in “making a difference” to collective efforts: Participative efficacy beliefs as a unique predictor of collective action:

    Martijn van Zomeren;Tamar Saguy;Fabian M. H. Schellhaas

  • Empathy and intergroup relations.

    John F. Dovidio;James D. Johnson;Samuel L. Gaertner;Adam R. Pearson

  • Interacting Like a Body Objectification Can Lead Women to Narrow Their Presence in Social Interactions

    Tamar Saguy;Diane M. Quinn;John F. Dovidio;Felicia Pratto

  • Included but Invisible? Subtle Bias, Common Identity, and the Darker Side of “We”

    John F. Dovidio;Samuel L. Gaertner;Elze Gooitzen Ufkes;Tamar Saguy

  • How group-based emotions are shaped by collective emotions: evidence for emotional transfer and emotional burden.

    Amit Goldenberg;Tamar Saguy;Eran Halperin

  • How Does Intergroup Contact Affect Social Change? Its Impact on Collective Action and Individual Mobility Intentions among Members of a Disadvantaged Group

    Nicole Tausch;Tamar Saguy;Jeff Bryson

  • Cooperation and Conflict within Groups: Bridging Intragroup and Intergroup Processes

    John F. Dovidio;Tamar Saguy;Nurit Shnabel

  • Recategorization and Prosocial Behavior

    John F. Dovidio;Samuel L. Gaertner;Nurit Shnabel;Tamar Saguy

  • Intergroup contact can undermine disadvantaged group members' attributions to discrimination☆

    Tamar Saguy;Lily Chernyak-Hai

  • Emotion Regulation and the Cultivation of Political Tolerance Searching for a New Track for Intervention

    Eran Halperin;Ruthie Pliskin;Tamar Saguy;Varda Liberman

  • A common ingroup identity: Categorization, identity, and intergroup relations.

    Samuel L. Gaertner;John F. Dovidio;Rita Guerra;Eric Hehman

  • Bias against research on gender bias

    Aleksandra Cislak;Magdalena Formanowicz;Tamar Saguy

  • Negotiating power: agenda ordering and the willingness to negotiate in asymmetric intergroup conflicts.

    Nour S. Kteily;Tamar Saguy;James Sidanius;Donald M. Taylor

  • Exposure to Outgroup Members Criticizing Their Own Group Facilitates Intergroup Openness

    Tamar Saguy;Eran Halperin

  • The gender-binary cycle: the perpetual relations between a biological-essentialist view of gender, gender ideology, and gender-labelling and sorting.

    Tamar Saguy;Michal Reifen-Tagar;Daphna Joel

  • Insecure Status Relations Shape Preferences for the Content of Intergroup Contact

    Tamar Saguy;John F. Dovidio

  • A Darker Side of Hope: Harmony-Focused Hope Decreases Collective Action Intentions Among the Disadvantaged.

    Siwar Hasan-Aslih;Ruthie Pliskin;Martijn van Zomeren;Eran Halperin

  • Power, negotiations, and the anticipation of intergroup encounters

    Tamar Saguy;Nour Kteily

Frequent Co-Authors

Eran Halperin
Eran Halperin Hebrew University of Jerusalem
John F. Dovidio
John F. Dovidio Yale University
Martijn van Zomeren
Martijn van Zomeren University of Groningen
Samuel L. Gaertner
Samuel L. Gaertner University of Delaware
Felicia Pratto
Felicia Pratto University of Connecticut
James J. Gross
James J. Gross Stanford University
Ángel Gómez
Ángel Gómez National University of Distance Education
William B. Swann
William B. Swann The University of Texas at Austin
Brock Bastian
Brock Bastian University of Melbourne
Michał Bilewicz
Michał Bilewicz University of Warsaw

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths, with many students considering fields such as social work, counseling, and mental health services. Online study options have made it simpler for students from different locations to discover relevant programs and flexible learning opportunities.

For those interested in combining psychology with social advocacy, top social work programs in Idaho offer strong curricula in community service and clinical practice. In the southern region, the top social work degrees in Jackson provide specialized training in urban and rural settings, preparing graduates to meet local needs.

Students searching for programs in the Southeast may explore the top social work degrees in Louisiana or learn more about the best social work degrees in Memphis. These programs emphasize both practical and theoretical skills, ideal for those wishing to make a meaningful impact through counseling, welfare, or clinical interventions.

Exploring related degrees and career pathways can help prospective psychology students tailor their education to future goals in advocacy, therapy, or research.

Best Scientists Citing Tamar Saguy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles