World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
9940
World Ranking
6373
National Ranking
74

Ángel Gómez publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ángel Gómez sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 113 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ángel Gómez D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ángel Gómez sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ángel Gómez is affiliated with the National University of Distance Education in Spain and has produced extensive research primarily within the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology. Their work spans multiple subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, and Applied Psychology.

Their research addresses several main topics such as Social and Intergroup Psychology, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Cultural Differences and Values, Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence, Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion, COVID-19 and Mental Health, and Misinformation and Its Impacts.

Significant recent publications by Ángel Gómez include:

  • "Politicization of COVID-19 health-protective behaviors in the United States: Longitudinal and cross-national evidence" (2021) published in PLoS ONE
  • "Intergroup contact research in the 21st century: Lessons learned and forward progress if we remain open" (2021) published in Journal of Social Issues
  • "Recent advances, misconceptions, untested assumptions, and future research agenda for identity fusion theory" (2020) published in Social and Personality Psychology Compass
  • "Psychometric Properties and Correlates of Precarious Manhood Beliefs in 62 Nations" (2021) published in Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
  • "Country-level and individual-level predictors of men's support for gender equality in 42 countries" (2020) published in European Journal of Social Psychology

Ángel Gómez has a number of frequent co-authors with whom they have collaborated extensively. These include Alexandra Vázquez, Victoria Wai Lan Yeung, Hoon-Seok Choi, Veljko Jovanović, and Manuel Moyano.

Their research has been featured repeatedly in several publication venues, with the most frequent being:

  • Scientific Reports
  • European Journal of Social Psychology
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • PLoS ONE
  • British Journal of Social Psychology

Best Publications

  • Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings

    Richard A. Klein;Michelangelo Vianello;Fred Hasselman;Byron G. Adams

  • When group membership gets personal: A theory of identity fusion.

    William B. Swann Jr.;Jolanda Jetten;Ángel Gómez;Harvey Whitehouse

  • Identity fusion: the interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior.

    William B. Swann Jr.;Ángel Gómez;D. Conor Seyle;J. Francisco Morales

  • On the nature of identity fusion: Insights into the construct and a new measure.

    Ángel Gómez;Matthew L. Brooks;Michael D. Buhrmester;Alexandra Vázquez

  • Dying and Killing for One’s Group Identity Fusion Moderates Responses to Intergroup Versions of the Trolley Problem

    William B. Swann;Ángel Gómez;John F. Dovidio;Sonia Hart

  • What makes a group worth dying for? Identity fusion fosters perception of familial ties, promoting self-sacrifice.

    William B. Swann;Michael D. Buhrmester;Angel Gómez;Jolanda Jetten

  • Identity Fusion and Self-Sacrifice: Arousal as a Catalyst of Pro-Group Fighting, Dying, and Helping Behavior

    William B. Swann Jr.;Ángel Gómez;Carmen Huici;J. Francisco Morales

  • White matter microstructure in female to male transsexuals before cross-sex hormonal treatment. A diffusion tensor imaging study

    Giuseppina Rametti;Beatriz Carrillo;Esther Gómez-Gil;Carme Junque

  • Rejected and Excluded Forevermore, but Even More Devoted Irrevocable Ostracism Intensifies Loyalty to the Group Among Identity-Fused Persons

    Ángel Gómez;J. Francisco Morales;Sonia Hart;Alexandra Vázquez

  • The devoted actor’s will to fight and the spiritual dimension of human conflict

    Ángel Gómez;Lucía López-Rodríguez;Hammad Sheikh;Jeremy Ginges

  • The evolution of extreme cooperation via shared dysphoric experiences

    Harvey Whitehouse;Jonathan Jong;Michael D. Buhrmester;Ángel Gómez

  • Contemplating the ultimate sacrifice: identity fusion channels pro-group affect, cognition, and moral decision making.

    William B Swann;Ángel Gómez;Michael D. Buhrmester;Michael D. Buhrmester;Lucía López-Rodríguez

  • The microstructure of white matter in male to female transsexuals before cross-sex hormonal treatment. A DTI study

    Giuseppina Rametti;Beatriz Carrillo;Esther Gómez-Gil;Carme Junque

  • When extended contact opens the door to future contact Testing the effects of extended contact on attitudes and intergroup expectancies in majority and minority groups

    Angel Gómez;Linda R. Tropp;Saulo Fernández

  • “Our Country Needs a Strong Leader Right Now”: Economic Inequality Enhances the Wish for a Strong Leader:

    Stefanie Sprong;Jolanda Jetten;Zhechen Wang;Kim Peters

  • Devoted actors sacrifice for close comrades and sacred cause.

    Scott Atran;Hammad Sheikh;Angel Gomez

  • Empirical evidence for the devoted actor model.

    Hammad Sheikh;Ángel Gómez;Scott Atran

  • Revisiting the Measurement of Anomie

    Ali Teymoori;Jolanda Jetten;Brock Bastian;Amarina Ariyanto

  • Politicization of COVID-19 health-protective behaviors in the United States: Longitudinal and cross-national evidence.

    Wolfgang Stroebe;Michelle R vanDellen;Georgios Abakoumkin;Edward P Lemay

  • Identity Fusion, Extreme Pro‐Group Behavior, and the Path to Defusion

    Leah A. Fredman;Michael D. Buhrmester;Angel Gomez;William T. Fraser

  • The Other Side of We: When Outgroup Members Express Common Identity

    Ángel Gómez;John F. Dovidio;Carmen Huici;Samuel L. Gaertner

Frequent Co-Authors

William B. Swann
William B. Swann The University of Texas at Austin
Michelle K. Ryan
Michelle K. Ryan University of Exeter
Brock Bastian
Brock Bastian University of Melbourne
Jolanda Jetten
Jolanda Jetten University of Queensland
Scott Atran
Scott Atran University of Oxford
Antonio Guillamón
Antonio Guillamón National University of Distance Education
Jocelyn J. Bélanger
Jocelyn J. Bélanger New York University
Roberto González
Roberto González Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Paul G. Bain
Paul G. Bain University of Bath
Bertus F. Jeronimus
Bertus F. Jeronimus University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens a wide range of career options, especially in fields focused on helping others improve their quality of life. One of the most rewarding pathways is speech-language pathology, which supports individuals with communication and swallowing disorders.

Online degrees are increasingly popular for those interested in this field, making it easier to balance studies with work or family commitments. However, it’s important to understand that becoming a speech-language pathologist requires meeting specific licensure requirements that differ by state.

For example, those becoming a speech therapist in New Mexico will face different steps and prerequisites than individuals becoming a speech therapist in New York. Likewise, you should be aware of the slp requirements in North Carolina and also learn how to become a speech language pathologist in North Dakota if you plan to practice in those states.

As you plan your educational journey, review state-specific regulations carefully and choose a program that aligns with your career aspirations. This ensures you are fully prepared for both national certification and state licensure exams.

Best Scientists Citing Ángel Gómez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles