World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
53
Citations
14250
World Ranking
4743
National Ranking
507

Michelle K. Ryan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle K. Ryan sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 154 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Michelle K. Ryan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle K. Ryan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michelle K. Ryan is affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of social sciences and psychology, with a significant focus on gender studies, sociology and political science, social psychology, clinical psychology, and organizational behavior and human resource management.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Gender Politics and Representation
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Among their frequent coauthors are:

  • Christopher T. Begeny
  • Veljko Jovanović
  • Georgios Abakoumkin
  • Edward P. Lemay
  • Maximilian Agostini

Their scholarly contributions have appeared extensively in several publication venues, notably:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • PLoS ONE
  • European Journal of Social Psychology
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • British Journal of Social Psychology

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Michelle K. Ryan include the following:

  • The Effects of Gender Trouble: An Integrative Theoretical Framework of the Perpetuation and Disruption of the Gender/Sex Binary (2020, Perspectives on Psychological Science)
  • Gender inequalities during COVID-19 (2021, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations)
  • In some professions, women have become well represented, yet gender bias persists-Perpetuated by those who think it is not happening (2020, Science Advances)
  • Contextualizing the Impostor "Syndrome" (2020, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • Politicization of COVID-19 health-protective behaviors in the United States: Longitudinal and cross-national evidence (2021, PLoS ONE)

Best Publications

  • The Glass Cliff: Evidence that Women are Over‐Represented in Precarious Leadership Positions

    Michelle K. Ryan;S. Alexander Haslam

  • The Glass Cliff: Exploring the Dynamics Surrounding the Appointment of Women to Precarious Leadership Positions

    Michelle K. Ryan;S. Alexander Haslam

  • The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations

    S. Alexander Haslam;Michelle K. Ryan

  • Think crisis-think female: the glass cliff and contextual variation in the think manager-think male stereotype.

    Michelle K. Ryan;S. Alexander Haslam;Mette D. Hersby;Renata Bongiorno

  • The Motivational Theory of Role Modeling: How Role Models Influence Role Aspirants’ Goals

    Thekla Morgenroth;Michelle K. Ryan;Kim Peters

  • Leadership as social identity management: Introducing the Identity Leadership Inventory (ILI) to assess and validate a four-dimensional model

    Niklas K. Steffens;S. Alexander Haslam;Stephen D. Reicher;Michael J. Platow

  • Getting on top of the glass cliff: Reviewing a decade of evidence, explanations, and impact

    Michelle K. Ryan;S. Alexander Haslam;S. Alexander Haslam;Thekla Morgenroth;Floor Rink

  • Investing with Prejudice: the Relationship Between Women's Presence on Company Boards and Objective and Subjective Measures of Company Performance

    S. Alexander Haslam;Michelle K. Ryan;Clara Kulich;Grzegorz Trojanowski

  • The glass ceiling in the 21st century: understanding barriers to gender equality

    Manuela da Costa Barreto;Michelle K. Ryan;Michael T. Schmitt

  • Who gets the carrot and who gets the stick? Evidence of gender disparities in executive remuneration

    Clara Kulich;Clara Kulich;Grzegorz Trojanowski;Michelle K. Ryan;S. Alexander Haslam

  • Beyond the Glass Ceiling: The Glass Cliff and Its Lessons for Organizational Policy

    Susanne Bruckmüller;Michelle K. Ryan;Floor Rink;S. Alexander Haslam

  • Women in high places: When and why promoting women into top positions can harm them individually or as a group (and how to prevent this)

    Naomi Ellemers;Floor Rink;Belle Derks;Michelle K. Ryan

  • Reactions to the glass cliff: Gender differences in the explanations for the precariousness of women's leadership positions

    Michelle K. Ryan;S. Alexander Haslam;Tom Postmes

  • Academic leadership: changing conceptions, identities and experiences in UK Higher Education

    Richard Bolden;Jonathan Gosling;Anne O'Brien;Kim Peters

  • Politics and the Glass Cliff: Evidence that Women are Preferentially Selected to Contest Hard-to-Win Seats:

    Michelle K. Ryan;S. Alexander Haslam;Clara Kulich

  • The Role of Personality and Group Factors in Explaining Prejudice

    Katherine J. Reynolds;John C. Turner;S.Alexander Haslam;Michelle K. Ryan

  • Why Do Men and Women Challenge Gender Discrimination in the Workplace? The Role of Group Status and In-group Identification in Predicting Pathways to Collective Action

    Aarti Iyer;Michelle K. Ryan

  • Sticking to our guns : social identity as a basis for the maintenance of commitment to faltering organizational projects

    S. Alexander Haslam;Michelle K. Ryan;Tom Postmes;Russell Spears

  • The Effects of Gender Trouble: An Integrative Theoretical Framework of the Perpetuation and Disruption of the Gender/Sex Binary:

    Thekla Morgenroth;Michelle K. Ryan;Michelle K. Ryan

  • Social Identity and the Romance of Leadership: The Importance of Being Seen To Be 'Doing It for Us'

    S. Alexander Haslam;Michael J. Platow;John C. Turner;Katherine J. Reynolds

  • WHO CARES? THE EFFECT OF GENDER AND CONTEXT ON THE SELF AND MORAL REASONING

    Michelle K. Ryan;Barbara David;Katherine J. Reynolds

Frequent Co-Authors

S. Alexander Haslam
S. Alexander Haslam University of Queensland
Jolanda Jetten
Jolanda Jetten University of Queensland
Niklas K. Steffens
Niklas K. Steffens University of Queensland
Katherine J. Reynolds
Katherine J. Reynolds Australian National University
Michael J. Platow
Michael J. Platow Australian National University
Tom Postmes
Tom Postmes University of Groningen
John C. Turner
John C. Turner Australian National University
Ángel Gómez
Ángel Gómez National University of Distance Education
Winnifred R. Louis
Winnifred R. Louis University of Queensland
Bertus F. Jeronimus
Bertus F. Jeronimus University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology programs can open doors to a wide range of academic and career options across the United States. Whether you're considering advanced study or preparing to enter the field, many institutions now offer flexible, high-quality online degrees to fit your needs.

For those pursuing the highest level of expertise, the best online psychology doctorate degree rankings in USA can guide students towards top doctoral programs available remotely. These doctorates can lead to leadership roles in research, clinical practice, and academia.

State-specific options are also growing. Those interested in undergraduate or graduate pathways will find tailored choices within the online psychology degrees in Illinois and the comprehensive online psychology programs in Massachusetts. California residents can review standout programs through the online psychology master's programs in California.

Graduates from online psychology degrees may pursue careers in counseling, mental health services, human resources, wellness coaching, or continue with further graduate study. With the flexibility and breadth of options now available, online study is making psychology education—and rewarding career pathways—more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Michelle K. Ryan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles