World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7798 7275 768 733 91 8798

Manuela Barreto publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Manuela Barreto between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Manuela Barreto published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2022. 16 of the 136 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2022. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 7 publications
1999 2025

136 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Manuela Barreto: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 1
2001 0
2002 2
2003 2
2004 1
2005 2
2006 3
2007 1
2008 4
2009 8
2010 9
2011 4
2012 0
2013 5
2014 4
2015 7
2016 7
2017 6
2018 7
2019 4
2020 5
2021 6
2022 17
2023 14
2024 9
2025 7
Total 136
Download as CSV

Manuela Barreto publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manuela Barreto sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 91 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 91
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Manuela Barreto D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manuela Barreto sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Manuela Barreto is affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields within the social sciences and psychology, with a focus on social psychology, sociology and political science, general health professions, health, and gender studies.

Their work covers a range of topics including health disparities and outcomes, LGBTQ health, identity and policy, social and intergroup psychology, gender roles and identity studies, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, aging and gerontology research, and gender diversity and inequality.

Barreto has contributed significantly to academic literature, with prominent recent papers such as:

  • Loneliness around the world: Age, gender, and cultural differences in loneliness (2020), published in Personality and Individual Differences
  • Exploring the nature and variation of the stigma associated with loneliness (2022), published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
  • Benevolent and hostile sexism in a shifting global context (2022), published in Nature Reviews Psychology
  • Changing the narrative: Loneliness as a social justice issue (2024), published in Political Psychology

In addition to these, Barreto was a co-author on a 2023 publication titled A systematic review of psychosocial functioning changes after gender-affirming hormone therapy among transgender people in Nature Human Behaviour.

Their frequent collaborators include Pamela Qualter, David Matthew Doyle, Christina Victor, Claudia Hammond, and Jolien van Breen.

Manuela Barreto's work appears regularly in several academic journals, with multiple publications in:

  • Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • British Journal of Social Psychology
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Journal of Social Issues
  • European Journal of Social Psychology

The research contributions by Barreto emphasize diverse aspects of social experience, examining cultural, gender, and health dimensions in social contexts. Their interdisciplinary approach spans psychology and social sciences, addressing contemporary issues such as loneliness, stigma, sexism, gender identity, and social justice considerations.

Best Publications

  • Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups.

    Colin Wayne Leach;Naomi Ellemers;Manuela Barreto

  • Loneliness around the world: Age, gender, and cultural differences in loneliness.

    Manuela Barreto;Christina Victor;Claudia Hammond;Alice Eccles

  • The burden of benevolent sexism: how it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities

    Manuela Barreto;Naomi Ellemers

  • The glass ceiling in the 21st century: understanding barriers to gender equality

    Manuela da Costa Barreto;Michelle K. Ryan;Michael T. Schmitt

  • Hidden costs of hiding stigma: Ironic interpersonal consequences of concealing a stigmatized identity in social interactions

    Anna-Kaisa Newheiser;Manuela Barreto;Manuela Barreto

  • Morality and behavioural regulation in groups: A social identity approach

    Naomi Ellemers;Stefano Pagliaro;Manuela Barreto

  • You Can’t Always Do What You Want: Social Identity and Self-Presentational Determinants of the Choice to Work for a Low-Status Group

    Manuela Barreto;Naomi Ellemers

  • The Perils of Political Correctness: Men's and Women's Responses to Old-Fashioned and Modern Sexist Views

    Manuela Barreto;Naomi Ellemers

  • Experiences of Loneliness Associated with Being an Informal Caregiver: A Qualitative Investigation

    Konstantina Vasileiou;Julie Barnett;Manuela Barreto;Manuela Barreto;John Vines

  • The effects of being categorised: The interplay between internal and external social identities

    Manuela Barreto;Naomi Ellemers

  • Is it better to be moral than smart? The effects of morality and competence norms on the decision to work at group status improvement.

    Naomi Ellemers;Stefano Pagliaro;Manuela Barreto;Colin Wayne Leach

  • How nice of us and how dumb of me: The effect of exposure to benevolent sexism on women’s task and relational self-descriptions.

    Manuela Barreto;Naomi Ellemers;Laura Piebinga;Miguel Moya

  • Collective Action in Modern Times: How Modern Expressions of Prejudice Prevent Collective Action

    Naomi Ellemers;Manuela Barreto

  • CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AS A SOURCE OF ORGANIZATIONAL MORALITY, EMPLOYEE COMMITMENT AND SATISFACTION

    Naomi Ellemers;Lotte Kingma;Jorgen van de Burgt;Manuela Barreto

  • Sharing Moral Values: Anticipated Ingroup Respect as a Determinant of Adherence to Morality-Based (but Not Competence-Based) Group Norms

    Stefano Pagliaro;Naomi Ellemers;Manuela Barreto

  • Working under cover: performance-related self-confidence among members of contextually devalued groups who try to pass

    Manuela Barreto;Naomi Ellemers;Serena Banal

  • The Impact of Respect Versus Neglect of Self-Identities on Identification and Group Loyalty

    Manuela Barreto;Naomi Ellemers

  • The Impact of Relative Group Status: Affective, Perceptual and Behavioral Consequences

    Naomi Ellemers;Manuela Barreto

  • Ways to Go: Men's and Women's Support for Aggressive and Nonaggressive Confrontation of Sexism as a Function of Gender Identification

    Julia C. Becker;Manuela Barreto

  • Who wants to know? The effect of audience on identity expression among minority group members

    Manuela Barreto;Russell Spears;Naomi Ellemers;Khosrow Shahinper

Frequent Co-Authors

Naomi Ellemers
Naomi Ellemers Utrecht University
John Vines
John Vines Northumbria University
Julie Barnett
Julie Barnett University of Bath
Colin Wayne Leach
Colin Wayne Leach Barnard College
Christina R. Victor
Christina R. Victor Brunel University London
Pamela Qualter
Pamela Qualter University of Manchester
Julia C. Becker
Julia C. Becker Osnabrück University
Anke Karl
Anke Karl University of Exeter
Cheryl R. Kaiser
Cheryl R. Kaiser University of Washington
Michelle K. Ryan
Michelle K. Ryan University of Exeter

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of rewarding careers. Many students discover closely related fields, such as social work, which combine psychological theory with hands-on practice to support individuals, families, and communities. Online degree options in both psychology and social work are increasingly popular, offering flexibility for busy learners and working professionals.

If you are interested in social work, you’ll find excellent programs across the country. For those on the West Coast, the best social work programs in Tacoma offer a diverse mix of in-class and online opportunities. Students looking nationwide should review the best social work degrees in USA to compare accredited programs that fit their goals.

Regionally, high-quality options include the best social work programs in Utah and the best social work degree programs in Virginia. Graduates of these programs can pursue varied pathways, such as counseling, case management, or community outreach. Whether in psychology or social work, online degrees help students build a strong foundation for a meaningful career focused on helping others.

Best Scientists Citing Manuela Barreto

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles