World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
12289
World Ranking
5606
National Ranking
580

Natalia Lawrence publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalia Lawrence sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 134 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Natalia Lawrence D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalia Lawrence sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Natalia Lawrence is affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and medicine, with a strong focus on clinical psychology and public health. The subfields of their work include applied psychology, physiology, and cognitive neuroscience. Lawrence's publications concentrate on topics related to eating disorders and behaviors, obesity, physical activity, and diet, with additional work addressing behavioral health interventions, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, COVID-19 and mental health, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, and agriculture sustainability and environmental impact.

Their frequent coauthors include Elanor C. Hinton, Julian Hamilton-Shield, Jeffrey M. Brunstrom, Jennifer S. Cox, and Elisa Becker. Lawrence has published extensively in several scientific venues, most notably in Appetite, where they have 25 publications. Other common publication venues include Frontiers in Psychology, Royal Society Open Science, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, and Digital Health.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Lawrence cover a range of topics on inhibitory control training, eating behaviors, and dietary intake. These include:

  • Food-related inhibitory control training reduces food liking but not snacking frequency or weight in a large healthy adult sample (2021, Appetite)
  • App-based food-specific inhibitory control training as an adjunct to treatment as usual in binge-type eating disorders: A feasibility trial (2021, Appetite)
  • App-based food Go/No-Go training: User engagement and dietary intake in an opportunistic observational study (2021, Appetite)
  • Meat disgust is negatively associated with meat intake - Evidence from a cross-sectional and longitudinal study (2021, Appetite)
  • The impact of COVID-19 on the eating habits of families engaged in a healthy eating pilot trial: a thematic analysis (2022, Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine)

Best Publications

  • Distinct Neural Correlates of Washing, Checking, and Hoarding Symptom Dimensions in Obsessive-compulsive Disorder

    David Mataix-Cols;Sarah Wooderson;Natalia Lawrence;Michael J. Brammer

  • The ENIGMA Consortium: large-scale collaborative analyses of neuroimaging and genetic data

    Paul M. Thompson;Jason L. Stein;Sarah E. Medland;Derrek P. Hibar

  • Cortical abnormalities in bipolar disorder : An MRI analysis of 6503 individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group

    D P Hibar;L T Westlye;L T Westlye;N T Doan;N T Doan;N Jahanshad

  • Subcortical and ventral prefrontal cortical neural responses to facial expressions distinguish patients with bipolar disorder and major depression.

    Natalia S Lawrence;Andrew M Williams;Simon Surguladze;Vincent Giampietro

  • Gamification of Cognitive Assessment and Cognitive Training: A Systematic Review of Applications and Efficacy

    Jim A Lumsden;Elizabeth A. Edwards;Natalia S. Lawrence;David Coyle

  • Subcortical volumetric abnormalities in bipolar disorder

    D. P. Hibar;L. T. Westlye;L. T. Westlye;T. G. M. van Erp;J. Rasmussen

  • Decision making and set shifting impairments are associated with distinct symptom dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Natalia S. Lawrence;Sarah Wooderson;David Mataix-Cols;Rhodri David

  • Cognitive mechanisms of nicotine on visual attention.

    Natalia Sophie Lawrence;Thomas J. Ross;Elliot A. Stein

  • Multiple Neuronal Networks Mediate Sustained Attention

    Natalia S. Lawrence;Thomas J. Ross;Ray Hoffmann;Hugh Garavan

  • Distinct Roles of Prefrontal Cortical Subregions in the Iowa Gambling Task

    Natalia Sophie Lawrence;Natalia Sophie Lawrence;Fabrice Jollant;Fabrice Jollant;Owen O'Daly;Fernando Zelaya

  • Orbitofrontal Cortex Response to Angry Faces in Men With Histories of Suicide Attempts

    Fabrice Jollant;Natalia Sophie Lawrence;Vincent Giampietro;Michael J. Brammer

  • Decreased activation of lateral orbitofrontal cortex during risky choices under uncertainty is associated with disadvantageous decision-making and suicidal behavior

    Fabrice Jollant;Natalia Sophie Lawrence;Natalia Sophie Lawrence;Emilie Olie;Owen O'Daly

  • Training response inhibition to food is associated with weight loss and reduced energy intake.

    Natalia S. Lawrence;Jamie O'Sullivan;David Parslow;Mahmood Javaid

  • Neural response to specific components of fearful faces in healthy and schizophrenic adults.

    Joaquim Radua;Mary Louise Phillips;Mary Louise Phillips;Tamara Russell;Natalia Lawrence

  • Nucleus accumbens response to food cues predicts subsequent snack consumption in women and increased body mass index in those with reduced self-control

    Natalia Sophie Lawrence;Elanor Clare Hinton;Elanor Clare Hinton;John A. Parkinson;Andrew David Lawrence

  • To discard or not to discard: the neural basis of hoarding symptoms in obsessive-compulsive disorder

    S. K. An;David Mataix-Cols;N. S. Lawrence;Sarah Wooderson

  • An investigation of decision making in anorexia nervosa using the Iowa Gambling Task and skin conductance measurements

    Kate Tchanturia;Pei-Chi Liao;Rudolf Uher;Natalia Lawrence

  • Ventral striatum activity in response to reward: differences between bipolar I and II disorders.

    Xavier Caseras;Natalia Sophie Lawrence;Kevin Murphy;Richard Geoffrey Wise

  • Stopping to food can reduce intake. Effects of stimulus-specificity and individual differences in dietary restraint

    Natalia Sophie Lawrence;Natalia Sophie Lawrence;Fredrick Verbruggen;Sinead Morrison;Rachel Charlotte Adams

  • Cognitive training as a potential treatment for overweight and obesity: A critical review of the evidence.

    Andrew Jones;Charlotte A. Hardman;Natalia Lawrence;Matt Field

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary L. Phillips
Mary L. Phillips University of Pittsburgh
Christopher D. Chambers
Christopher D. Chambers Cardiff University
Frederick Verbruggen
Frederick Verbruggen Ghent University
Michael Brammer
Michael Brammer King's College London
David Mataix-Cols
David Mataix-Cols Karolinska Institute
Vincent Giampietro
Vincent Giampietro King's College London
Anne E. M. Speckens
Anne E. M. Speckens Radboud University
Marcus R. Munafò
Marcus R. Munafò University of Bath
Fabrice Jollant
Fabrice Jollant University of Paris-Saclay
Xavier Caseras
Xavier Caseras Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a degree in Psychology, a variety of related online programs can open career pathways in counseling, behavioral health, and mental wellness. Many students explore options for becoming a professional counselor, mental health clinician, or substance abuse specialist. Flexibility is a top priority for many, so online and accelerated programs have become increasingly popular.

State requirements can vary, but research into the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Maine highlights pathways that are both efficient and tailored for your licensure goals. Similarly, those looking for options on the East Coast might consider the Maryland fastest counseling programs or review what’s available through Massachusetts accelerated counseling programs.

If you’re elsewhere in the U.S., it’s important to recognize that other states, such as Michigan, also offer a quickest path to becoming a counselor in Michigan. Each state’s requirements and program lengths will differ, so careful research is essential. Fully online degrees in Psychology or Counseling can pave the way for a rewarding and impactful career—often on a timeline that fits your needs.

Best Scientists Citing Natalia Lawrence

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles