World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
40
Citations
6718
World Ranking
2055
National Ranking
871

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
40
Citations
6961
World Ranking
7281
National Ranking
1987

Mihai Anitescu publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mihai Anitescu sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 192 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Mihai Anitescu D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mihai Anitescu sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - SIAM Fellow For contributions to the modeling, theory, and practice of optimization.

Overview

Mihai Anitescu is affiliated with Argonne National Laboratory in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily in Engineering and Computer Science, with a focus on subfields such as Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Numerical Analysis, Artificial Intelligence, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

Their main research topics include:

  • Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Power System Optimization and Stability
  • Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
  • Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
  • Matrix Theory and Algorithms
  • Advanced Control Systems Optimization

Mihai Anitescu has published extensively, with frequent contributions appearing in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Electric Power Systems Research, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Mathematical Programming, and the SIAM Journal on Optimization.

Significant recent papers include:

  • "An adaptive stochastic sequential quadratic programming with differentiable exact augmented lagrangians", 2022, Mathematical Programming
  • "Exponential Decay of Sensitivity in Graph-Structured Nonlinear Programs", 2022, SIAM Journal on Optimization
  • "Inequality constrained stochastic nonlinear optimization via active-set sequential quadratic programming", 2023, Mathematical Programming
  • "Distributed Frequency Divider for Power System Bus Frequency Online Estimation Considering Virtual Inertia From DFIGs", 2022, IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems
  • "Accelerating optimal power flow with GPUs: SIMD abstraction of nonlinear programs and condensed-space interior-point methods", 2024, Electric Power Systems Research

Frequent collaborators include Sungho Shin, Daniel Adrian Maldonado, François Pacaud, Sen Na, and Michel Schanen. These coauthors have worked extensively with Anitescu across multiple projects and publications.

Mihai Anitescu has been recognized as a SIAM Fellow in 2019 for contributions to the modeling, theory, and practice of optimization.

Best Publications

  • Formulating Dynamic Multi-Rigid-Body Contact Problems with Friction as Solvable Linear Complementarity Problems

    M. Anitescu;F. A. Potra

  • Nuclear data sensitivity, uncertainty and target accuracy assessment for future nuclear systems

    G. Aliberti;G. Palmiotti;M. Salvatores;T.K. Kim

  • A Computational Framework for Uncertainty Quantification and Stochastic Optimization in Unit Commitment With Wind Power Generation

    E M Constantinescu;V M Zavala;M Rocklin;Sangmin Lee

  • Time-stepping for three-dimensional rigid body dynamics

    Mihai Anitescu;Florian A. Potra;David E. Stewart

  • An iterative approach for cone complementarity problems for nonsmooth dynamics

    Mihai Anitescu;Alessandro Tasora

  • Optimization-based simulation of nonsmooth rigid multibody dynamics

    Mihai Anitescu

  • A matrix-free cone complementarity approach for solving large-scale, nonsmooth, rigid body dynamics

    A. Tasora;M. Anitescu

  • A time-stepping method for stiff multibody dynamics with contact and friction

    Mihai Anitescu;Florian A. Potra

  • A constraint‐stabilized time‐stepping approach for rigid multibody dynamics with joints, contact and friction

    Mihai Anitescu;Gary D. Hart

  • Real-Time Stochastic Optimization of Complex Energy Systems on High-Performance Computers

    Cosmin G. Petra;Olaf Schenk;Mihai Anitescu

  • Formulating Three-Dimensional Contact Dynamics Problems

    Mihai Anitescu;James F. Cremer;Florian A. Potra

  • On-line economic optimization of energy systems using weather forecast information.

    Victor M. Zavala;Emil M. Constantinescu;Theodore Krause;Mihai Anitescu

  • On Using the Elastic Mode in Nonlinear Programming Approaches to Mathematical Programs with Complementarity Constraints

    Mihai Anitescu

  • Theory and design of signal-adapted FIR paraunitary filter banks

    P. Moulin;M.K. Mihcak

  • Real-Time Nonlinear Optimization as a Generalized Equation

    Victor M. Zavala;Mihai Anitescu

  • The role of linear semi-infinite programming in signal-adapted QMF bank design

    P. Moulin;M. Anitescu;K.O. Kortanek;F.A. Potra

  • Degenerate Nonlinear Programming with a Quadratic Growth Condition

    Mihai Anitescu

  • Elastic-mode algorithms for mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints: global convergence and stationarity properties

    Mihai Anitescu;Paul Tseng;Stephen J. Wright

  • A Convex Complementarity Approach for Simulating Large Granular Flows

    Alessandro Tasora;Mihai Anitescu

  • STOCHASTIC APPROXIMATION OF SCORE FUNCTIONS FOR GAUSSIAN PROCESSES

    Michael L. Stein;Jie Chen;Mihai Anitescu

  • Large-scale parallel multi-body dynamics with frictional contact on the graphical processing unit:

    A Tasora;D Negrut;M Anitescu

  • Global Convergence of an Elastic Mode Approach for a Class of Mathematical Programs with Complementarity Constraints

    Mihai Anitescu

Frequent Co-Authors

Victor M. Zavala
Victor M. Zavala University of Wisconsin–Madison
Florian A. Potra
Florian A. Potra University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Michael L. Stein
Michael L. Stein Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Pierre Moulin
Pierre Moulin University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Peter Zapol
Peter Zapol Argonne National Laboratory
John R. Birge
John R. Birge University of Chicago
William Layton
William Layton University of Pittsburgh
Paul Fischer
Paul Fischer University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Kannan Ramchandran
Kannan Ramchandran University of California, Berkeley
Fred J. Hickernell
Fred J. Hickernell Illinois Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens doors to various advanced degree options and career pathways. Many students consider complementing their math skills with business acumen through programs like 1 year MBA programs in USA, which offer a fast-track to leadership roles in finance, analytics, and management.

For those looking for flexibility, online MBA accepting transfer credits options provide a viable route to advance without interrupting current professional responsibilities. This pathway is especially useful for students who want to build on their existing qualifications.

Mathematically inclined graduates may also explore a master in data analytics, a degree highly relevant for careers in big data, artificial intelligence, and business intelligence. The combination of math and analytics is in high demand across industries.

For those concerned about admissions competitiveness, researching the easiest MBA programs to get into can help in finding accessible yet credible options to continue education and broaden career prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Mihai Anitescu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles