World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andrew G. Fraser

Andrew G. Fraser

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 50 3887 3668 149 137 93 34866

Andrew G. Fraser publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew G. Fraser between 1975 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew G. Fraser published across 52 years, from 1975 to 2026, averaging 2.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2004. 8 of the 130 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2004. 1975: 2 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 5 publications
1975 2026

130 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew G. Fraser: publications per year, 1975 to 2026
Year Publications
1975 2
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 3
1997 4
1998 1
1999 2
2000 3
2001 2
2002 5
2003 9
2004 11
2005 4
2006 8
2007 0
2008 3
2009 4
2010 3
2011 8
2012 2
2013 2
2014 3
2015 4
2016 0
2017 4
2018 2
2019 5
2020 4
2021 4
2022 8
2023 7
2024 3
2025 3
2026 5
Total 130
Download as CSV

Andrew G. Fraser publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew G. Fraser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 85–94 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 93 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102 93
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew G. Fraser D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew G. Fraser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141 50
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrew G. Fraser is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant emphasis on hepatology, as well as related subfields such as epidemiology, molecular biology, surgery, and parasitology.

The scientist has contributed to several main topics within their field of study, including:

  • Hepatitis C virus research
  • Liver disease diagnosis and treatment
  • Liver disease and transplantation
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma treatment and prognosis
  • Parasites and host interactions
  • Gastrointestinal bleeding diagnosis and treatment
  • Drug-induced hepatotoxicity and protection

Andrew G. Fraser has published multiple recent papers, illustrating ongoing research in hepatology and associated topics. These include:

  • Clinical effectiveness of pharmacist-led versus conventionally delivered antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus in patients receiving opioid substitution therapy: a pragmatic, cluster-randomised trial (2020) in The Lancet. Gastroenterology & Hepatology
  • Mortality and morbidity of locally acquired hepatitis E in the national Scottish cohort: a multicentre retrospective study (2020) in Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
  • Mortality rates among patients successfully treated for hepatitis C in the era of interferon-free antivirals: population based cohort study (2023) in BMJ
  • Performance of models to predict hepatocellular carcinoma risk among UK patients with cirrhosis and cured HCV infection (2021) in JHEP Reports
  • Population impact of direct-acting antiviral treatment on new presentations of hepatitis C-related decompensated cirrhosis: a national record-linkage study (2020) in Gut

The scientist frequently publishes in journals such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
  • Frontline Gastroenterology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Abstracts

Collaboration is a notable element of Andrew G. Fraser's work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • John Dillon
  • Stephen T. Barclay
  • Sharon Hutchinson
  • Peter Hayes
  • Hamish Innes

Best Publications

  • Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi

    Ravi S. Kamath;Andrew G. Fraser;Andrew G. Fraser;Yan Dong;Gino Poulin

  • Complete genome sequence of the model actinomycete Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2)

    S. D. Bentley;K. F. Chater;A.-M. Cerdeño-Tárraga;G. L. Challis;G. L. Challis

  • Genes that act downstream of DAF-16 to influence the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans

    Coleen T. Murphy;Steven A. McCarroll;Cornelia I. Bargmann;Andrew Fraser

  • Functional genomic analysis of C. elegans chromosome I by systematic RNA interference

    Andrew G. Fraser;Ravi S. Kamath;Peder Zipperlen;Maruxa Martinez-Campos

  • A Map of the Interactome Network of the Metazoan C. elegans

    Siming Li;Christopher M. Armstrong;Nicolas Bertin;Hui Ge

  • The genome sequence of Schizosaccharomyces pombe

    V. Wood;R. Gwilliam;M.A. Rajandream;M. Lyne

  • A compendium of RNA-binding motifs for decoding gene regulation

    Debashish Ray;Hilal Kazan;Kate B. Cook;Matthew T. Weirauch;Matthew T. Weirauch

  • Effectiveness of specific RNA-mediated interference through ingested double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Ravi S Kamath;Maruxa Martinez-Campos;Peder Zipperlen;Andrew G Fraser

  • Genome-wide RNAi analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans fat regulatory genes

    Kaveh Ashrafi;Francesca Y. Chang;Jennifer L. Watts;Andrew G. Fraser

  • Rates of Behavior and Aging Specified by Mitochondrial Function During Development

    Andrew Dillin;Ao Lin Hsu;Nuno Arantes-Oliveira;Joshua Lehrer-Graiwer

  • A systematic RNAi screen identifies a critical role for mitochondria in C. elegans longevity.

    Siu Sylvia Lee;Raymond Y. N. Lee;Raymond Y. N. Lee;Andrew G. Fraser;Ravi S. Kamath

  • Genetic analysis of tissue aging in Caenorhabditis elegans: a role for heat-shock factor and bacterial proliferation.

    Delia Garigan;Ao-Lin Hsu;Andrew G Fraser;Ravi S Kamath

  • A License to Kill

    Andrew Fraser;Gerard Evan

  • Genome-Wide RNAi of C. elegans Using the Hypersensitive rrf-3 Strain Reveals Novel Gene Functions

    Femke Simmer;Celine Moorman;Alexander M van der Linden;Ewart Kuijk

  • Systematic mapping of genetic interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans identifies common modifiers of diverse signaling pathways.

    Ben Lehner;Ben Lehner;Ben Lehner;Catriona Crombie;Julia Tischler;Angelo Fortunato;Angelo Fortunato;Angelo Fortunato

  • Minimizing the risk of reporting false positives in large-scale RNAi screens

    Christophe J Echeverri;Philip A Beachy;Buzz Baum;Michael Boutros

  • Genome sequence of the enterobacterial phytopathogen Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica and characterization of virulence factors

    K. S. Bell;M. Sebaihia;L. Pritchard;L. Pritchard;M. T. G. Holden

  • A single gene network accurately predicts phenotypic effects of gene perturbation in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Insuk Lee;Ben Lehner;Ben Lehner;Catriona Crombie;Wendy Wong

  • International genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new primary biliary cirrhosis risk loci and targetable pathogenic pathways

    Heather J. Cordell;Younghun Han;George F. Mells;Yafang Li

  • CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS INHIBITOR OF APOPTOSIS PROTEIN (IAP) HOMOLOGUE BIR-1 PLAYS A CONSERVED ROLE IN CYTOKINESIS

    Andrew G. Fraser;Claerwen James;Gerard I. Evan;Michael O. Hengartner

Frequent Co-Authors

Ben Lehner
Ben Lehner Wellcome Sanger Institute
Julie Ahringer
Julie Ahringer University of Cambridge
Gerard I. Evan
Gerard I. Evan The Francis Crick Institute
Edward M. Marcotte
Edward M. Marcotte The University of Texas at Austin
Anne-Claude Gingras
Anne-Claude Gingras Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Calum A. MacRae
Calum A. MacRae Brigham and Women's Hospital
Quaid Morris
Quaid Morris Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Thomas R. Gingeras
Thomas R. Gingeras Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Philipp Kapranov
Philipp Kapranov Huaqiao University
Ronald H. A. Plasterk
Ronald H. A. Plasterk University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics opens diverse doors in healthcare and science, and many students explore related online degrees for flexibility and career advancement. Programs like the rn to bsn program without clinicals offer practicing nurses a pathway to further their credentials online, without requiring on-site clinical hours. This offers efficiency for those balancing work, family, and studies.

If you are seeking advanced leadership roles in healthcare, accelerated options such as a 1 year dnp program online can fast-track your doctorate in nursing practice from home. For those wanting to enter the medical field quickly, there are medical assistant programs that can be completed in just a few weeks, setting you up for a support role in clinics or labs.

Some learners prioritize convenience and minimal in-person requirements, so options like online dnp programs without clinicals are also available. These varied pathways make it easier than ever to align a Genetics background with healthcare careers, allowing you to choose the route that best fits your goals and schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew G. Fraser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles