World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 64 2740 2594 345 330 117 32015

Julie Ahringer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Julie Ahringer between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Julie Ahringer published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2011. 5 of the 129 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2011. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 6 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 5 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1984 2025

129 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Julie Ahringer: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 3
1997 2
1998 1
1999 1
2000 6
2001 4
2002 4
2003 13
2004 5
2005 3
2006 1
2007 5
2008 3
2009 1
2010 3
2011 14
2012 1
2013 6
2014 6
2015 1
2016 5
2017 8
2018 10
2019 3
2020 4
2021 4
2022 2
2023 1
2024 3
2025 2
Total 129
Download as CSV

Julie Ahringer publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie Ahringer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 115–124 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 117 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203 117
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Julie Ahringer D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie Ahringer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172 64
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

Julie Ahringer is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom and focuses on research within the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their work spans several specialized areas including Molecular Biology, Aging, Plant Science, Cell Biology, and Artificial Intelligence.

The scientist's research touches on multiple topics, including:

  • Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms

Recent publications by Julie Ahringer include the following:

  • "Distinctive regulatory architectures of germline-active and somatic genes in C. elegans", 2020, Genome Research
  • "The Caenorhabditis elegans homolog of the Evi1 proto-oncogene, egl-43, coordinates G1 cell cycle arrest with pro-invasive gene expression during anchor cell invasion", 2020, PLoS Genetics
  • "DREAM represses distinct targets by cooperating with different THAP domain proteins", 2021, Cell Reports
  • "Accessible Region Conformation Capture (ARC-C) gives high-resolution insights into genome architecture and regulation", 2021, Genome Research
  • "Widespread transposon co-option in the Caenorhabditis germline regulatory network", 2022, Science Advances

Frequent co-authors working alongside Julie Ahringer include:

  • Alex Appert
  • Francesco N. Carelli
  • Dong Yan
  • Chiara Cerrato
  • Jacques Serizay

Publication venues where Julie Ahringer's work is most commonly found include BioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), UNC Libraries, Genome Research, Cell Reports, and PLoS Genetics.

Among awards received, Julie Ahringer is recognized as a Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom, and as a Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO).

Best Publications

  • Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi

    Ravi S. Kamath;Andrew G. Fraser;Andrew G. Fraser;Yan Dong;Gino Poulin

  • Genes that act downstream of DAF-16 to influence the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans

    Coleen T. Murphy;Steven A. McCarroll;Cornelia I. Bargmann;Andrew Fraser

  • Functional genomic analysis of C. elegans chromosome I by systematic RNA interference

    Andrew G. Fraser;Ravi S. Kamath;Peder Zipperlen;Maruxa Martinez-Campos

  • Genome-wide RNAi screening in Caenorhabditis elegans.

    Ravi S. Kamath;Julie Ahringer

  • Effectiveness of specific RNA-mediated interference through ingested double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Ravi S Kamath;Maruxa Martinez-Campos;Peder Zipperlen;Andrew G Fraser

  • Genome-wide RNAi analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans fat regulatory genes

    Kaveh Ashrafi;Francesca Y. Chang;Jennifer L. Watts;Andrew G. Fraser

  • Rates of Behavior and Aging Specified by Mitochondrial Function During Development

    Andrew Dillin;Ao Lin Hsu;Nuno Arantes-Oliveira;Joshua Lehrer-Graiwer

  • Integrative analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome by the modENCODE project

    Mark B. Gerstein;Zhi John Lu;Eric L. Van Nostrand;Chao Cheng

  • A systematic RNAi screen identifies a critical role for mitochondria in C. elegans longevity.

    Siu Sylvia Lee;Raymond Y. N. Lee;Raymond Y. N. Lee;Andrew G. Fraser;Ravi S. Kamath

  • Genetic analysis of tissue aging in Caenorhabditis elegans: a role for heat-shock factor and bacterial proliferation.

    Delia Garigan;Ao-Lin Hsu;Andrew G Fraser;Ravi S Kamath

  • Differential chromatin marking of introns and expressed exons by H3K36me3.

    Paulina Kolasinska-Zwierz;Thomas Down;Isabel Latorre;Tao Liu

  • Genome-Wide RNAi of C. elegans Using the Hypersensitive rrf-3 Strain Reveals Novel Gene Functions

    Femke Simmer;Celine Moorman;Alexander M van der Linden;Ewart Kuijk

  • Loss of the putative RNA-directed RNA polymerase RRF-3 makes C. elegans hypersensitive to RNAi.

    Femke Simmer;Marcel Tijsterman;Susan Parrish;Susan Parrish;Sandhya P Koushika

  • The art and design of genetic screens: RNA interference

    Michael Boutros;Julie Ahringer

  • Cell Polarity in Eggs and Epithelia: Parallels and Diversity

    Daniel St Johnston;Julie Ahringer

  • NuRD and SIN3: histone deacetylase complexes in development

    Julie Ahringer

  • The C. elegans Hook Protein, ZYG-12, Mediates the Essential Attachment between the Centrosome and Nucleus

    Christian J. Malone;Lisa Misner;Nathalie Le Bot;Miao-Chih Tsai

  • An assessment of histone-modification antibody quality

    Thea A. Egelhofer;Aki Minoda;Aki Minoda;Sarit Klugman;Sarit Klugman;Kyungjoon Lee

  • Comparative analysis of metazoan chromatin organization

    Joshua Wing Kei Ho;Joshua Wing Kei Ho;Youngsook L. Jung;Tao Liu;Tao Liu;Burak Han Alver

  • Centrosome maturation and duplication in C. elegans require the coiled-coil protein SPD-2.

    Catherine A Kemp;Kevin R Kopish;Peder Zipperlen;Julie Ahringer

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew G. Fraser
Andrew G. Fraser University of Toronto
Susan Strome
Susan Strome University of California, Santa Cruz
Fabio Piano
Fabio Piano New York University
Arshad Desai
Arshad Desai University of California, San Diego
Michael J. MacCoss
Michael J. MacCoss University of Washington
Eran Segal
Eran Segal Weizmann Institute of Science
Lincoln Stein
Lincoln Stein Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
Steven Henikoff
Steven Henikoff Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Michael Snyder
Michael Snyder Stanford University
Chao Cheng
Chao Cheng Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students passionate about genetics, pursuing related online degrees can open up diverse career pathways in healthcare and scientific research. Many roles—such as genetic counselors, lab technicians, or research scientists—often benefit from a strong foundational education in nursing or allied health fields.

If you are considering a clinically oriented path, obtaining an online nurse practitioner degree can provide advanced skills that are highly sought after in genetics clinics and hospitals. For those just beginning their journey, finding the cheapest way to become a nurse allows you to start building practical healthcare experience while minimizing tuition costs.

Working RNs who wish to expand their roles or transition into research may look into msn to dnp programs. These advanced programs are ideal for nurses aiming to lead genetic health initiatives. Another affordable option for advancing your qualifications is enrolling in one of the cheapest accredited online rn to bsn programs, which broadens your career options in both clinical and laboratory settings.

Best Scientists Citing Julie Ahringer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles