World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
8570
World Ranking
7488
National Ranking
4042

Cheryl R. Kaiser publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cheryl R. Kaiser sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 88 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Cheryl R. Kaiser D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cheryl R. Kaiser sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cheryl R. Kaiser is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the social sciences, with a focus on social and intergroup psychology, sexual assault and victimization studies, gender diversity and inequality, electoral systems and political participation, racial and ethnic identity research, LGBTQ health, identity, and policy, as well as workplace violence and bullying.

Their main subfields of study include gender studies, sociology and political science, political science and international relations, social psychology, and organizational behavior and human resource management.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Cheryl R. Kaiser include:

  • "Show Don't Tell: Diversity Dishonesty Harms Racial/Ethnic Minorities at Work," 2020, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • "Narrow prototypes and neglected victims: Understanding perceptions of sexual harassment," 2021, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • "The Surprising Stability of Asian Americans' and Latinos' Partisan Identities in the Early Trump Era," 2023, The Journal of Politics
  • "Diversity Initiatives and White Americans' Perceptions of Racial Victimhood," 2021, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • "Person-Message Fit: Racial Identification Moderates the Benefits of Multicultural and Colorblind Diversity Approaches," 2020, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Cheryl R. Kaiser include Bryn Bandt-Law, Daniel J. Hopkins, Efrén O. Pérez, Rebecca Schachtman, and Nathan N. Cheek.

Their publications have appeared mainly in the following venues:

  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • The Journal of Politics
  • European Journal of Social Psychology

Best Publications

  • A Theoretical Perspective on Coping with Stigma.

    Carol T. Miller;Cheryl R. Kaiser

  • Stop Complaining! The Social Costs of Making Attributions to Discrimination

    Cheryl R. Kaiser;Carol T. Miller

  • Presumed Fair: Ironic Effects of Organizational Diversity Structures

    Cheryl R. Kaiser;Brenda Major;Ines Jurcevic;Tessa L. Dover

  • Perceived discrimination as worldview threat or worldview confirmation: implications for self-esteem.

    Brenda Major;Cheryl R. Kaiser;Laurie T. O'Brien;Shannon K. McCoy

  • It's Not My Fault: When and Why Attributions to Prejudice Protect Self-Esteem

    Brenda Major;Cheryl R. Kaiser;Shannon K. McCoy

  • Allies against Sexism: The Role of Men in Confronting Sexism

    Benjamin J. Drury;Cheryl R. Kaiser

  • Members of high-status groups are threatened by pro-diversity organizational messages

    Tessa L. Dover;Brenda Major;Cheryl R. Kaiser

  • Distributing prejudice unequally: do Whites direct their prejudice toward strongly identified minorities?

    Cheryl R. Kaiser;Jennifer S. Pratt-Hyatt

  • A Social Psychological Perspective on Perceiving and Reporting Discrimination

    Cheryl R. Kaiser;Brenda Major

  • A Stress and Coping Perspective on Confronting Sexism

    Cheryl R. Kaiser;Carol T. Miller

  • Racial Progress as Threat to the Status Hierarchy Implications for Perceptions of Anti-White Bias

    Clara L. Wilkins;Cheryl R. Kaiser

  • Prejudice Expectations Moderate Preconscious Attention to Cues That Are Threatening to Social Identity

    Cheryl R. Kaiser;S. Brooke Vick;Brenda Major

  • Derogating the Victim: The Interpersonal Consequences of Blaming Events on Discrimination

    Cheryl R. Kaiser;Carol T. Miller

  • Mixed Signals: The Unintended Effects of Diversity Initiatives

    Tessa L. Dover;Cheryl R. Kaiser;Brenda Major

  • Why Are Attributions to Discrimination Interpersonally Costly? A Test of System- and Group-Justifying Motivations

    Cheryl R. Kaiser;Portia S. Dyrenforth;Nao Hagiwara

  • The ironic consequences of Obama's election: Decreased support for social justice

    Cheryl R. Kaiser;Benjamin J. Drury;Kerry E. Spalding;Sapna Cheryan

  • A Prospective Investigation of the Relationship Between Just-World Beliefs and the Desire for Revenge After September 11, 2001

    Cheryl R. Kaiser;S. Brooke Vick;Brenda Major

  • Expectations about the Future and the Emotional Consequences of Perceiving Prejudice

    Cheryl R. Kaiser;Brenda Major;Shannon K. Mccoy

  • Reacting to Impending Discrimination: Compensation for Prejudice and Attributions to Discrimination

    Cheryl R. Kaiser;Carol T. Miller

  • Prejudice and self-esteem: A transactional model

    Brenda Major;Shannon McCoy;Cheryl Kaiser;Wendy Quinton

Frequent Co-Authors

Brenda Major
Brenda Major University of California, Santa Barbara
Carol T. Miller
Carol T. Miller University of Vermont
Daniel J. Hopkins
Daniel J. Hopkins University of Pennsylvania
Manuela Barreto
Manuela Barreto University of Exeter
Bruce E. Compas
Bruce E. Compas Vanderbilt University
Victoria M. Esses
Victoria M. Esses University of Western Ontario
Efrén O. Pérez
Efrén O. Pérez University of California, Los Angeles
Jessica A. Sommerville
Jessica A. Sommerville University of Toronto
Crystal L. Hoyt
Crystal L. Hoyt University of Richmond
Linda J. Luecken
Linda J. Luecken Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degrees and exciting career paths. One increasingly popular option is pursuing a career as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). The pathway to becoming a BCBA involves earning relevant degrees, supervised experience, and passing a national certification exam.

Requirements can vary by location. For example, check out the detailed steps for becoming a bcba in Boise or explore the specific bcba certification requirements in Boston. If you’re interested in the New York region, be sure to review the Buffalo bcba education requirements. Similarly, there’s a clear overview for those considering becoming a bcba in Chandler.

With the rise of online psychology degrees, it’s now easier to complete prerequisite coursework and specialized training from anywhere. This flexibility allows you to tailor your education to meet local certification standards while preparing for a rewarding career helping individuals and communities thrive.

Best Scientists Citing Cheryl R. Kaiser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles