World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
70
Citations
15238
World Ranking
7114
National Ranking
249

John H. Borden publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John H. Borden sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 404 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

John H. Borden D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John H. Borden sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1999 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada Academy of Science

Overview

John H. Borden is affiliated with Simon Fraser University in Canada and has a research focus primarily within Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Environmental Science. Their areas of expertise extend across several subfields including Insect Science, Ecology, Genetics, Epidemiology, and Infectious Diseases.

Their research addresses a variety of topics with an emphasis on insect and pesticide research, forest insect ecology and management, and insect and arachnid ecology and behavior. Additional specialized interests include Trypanosoma species research and implications, insect-plant interactions and control, dermatological diseases and infestations, and insect and parasite interactions.

Frequent publication venues for their work include The Canadian Entomologist, Journal of Medical Entomology, Journal of Economic Entomology, Pest Management Science, and Environmental Entomology. The Canadian Entomologist features the highest number of their publications.

They have collaborated regularly with several co-authors, notably Michael G. Banfield, Christopher H. Downs, Gabriel L. Hamer, Sarah A. Hamer, and Alyssa S Branca.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by John H. Borden include:

  • "Detection and monitoring of bed bugs (Hemiptera: Cimicidae): review of the underlying science, existing products and future prospects," 2021, Pest Management Science
  • "Disruption of coniferophagous bark beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) mass attack using angiosperm nonhost volatiles: from concept to operational use," 2020, The Canadian Entomologist
  • "Comparative Evaluation of Pitfall Traps for Click Beetles (Coleoptera: Elateridae)," 2022, Journal of Economic Entomology
  • "Development of an operational trap for collection, killing, and preservation of triatomines (Hemiptera: Reduviidae): the kissing bug kill trap," 2024, Journal of Medical Entomology
  • "Semiochemical-based integrated pest management of ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in British Columbia's forest industry: implemented in 1982 and still running," 2020, The Canadian Entomologist

Among the recognitions received, John H. Borden was named a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada in 1999, within the Academy of Science category.

Best Publications

  • Semiochemical basis of the retinue response to queen honey bees

    Keith N. Slessor;Lori-Ann Kaminski;G. G. S. King;John H. Borden

  • A review of the chemical ecology of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera)

    Jeremy D. Allison;John H. Borden;Steven J. Seybold

  • Aggregation pheromones of two asian palm Weevils, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus and R. vulneratus

    R. H. Hallett;G. Gries;R. Gries;J. H. Borden

  • Conversion of verbenols to verbenone by yeasts isolated fromDendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).

    D. W. A. Hunt;J. H. Borden

  • Response of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonusponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), to five semiochemicals in British Columbia lodgepole pine forests

    J. H. Borden;L. C. Ryker;L. J. Chong;H. D. Pierce

  • Pheromone trapping protocols for the Asian palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).

    Rebecca H. Hallett;A. Cameron Oehlschlager;John H. Borden

  • Sulcatol: Population aggregation pheromone in the scolytid beetle, Gnathotrichus sulcatus

    K.J. Byrne;A.A. Swigar;R.M. Silverstein;J.H. Borden

  • Dynamics of pheromone production and communication in the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, and the pine engraver, Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).

    Deepa S. Pureswaran;Regine Gries;John H. Borden;Harold D. Pierce

  • Secondary Ambrosia Beetles in Apparently Healthy Trees: Adaptations, Potential Causes and Suggested Research

    Susanne Kühnholz;John H. Borden;Adnan Uzunovic

  • Comparative efficacy of five types of trap for woodborers in the Cerambycidae, Buprestidae and Siricidae

    R. L. McIntosh;P. J. Katinic;J. D. Allison;J. H. Borden

  • Aggregation pheromone of coconut rhinoceros beetle,Oryctes rhinoceros (L.) (coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)

    Hallett Rh;Perez Al;Gries G;Gries R

  • β-Phellandrene: kairomone for pine engraver,Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).

    Daniel R. Miller;John H. Borden

  • An improved trap for large wood-boring insects, with special reference to Monochamus scutellatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae).

    W D Morewood;K E Hein;P J Katinic;J H Borden

  • Primary attraction and kairomonal host discrimination in three species of Dendroctonus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)

    Deepa S. Pureswaran;John H. Borden

  • Dose-dependent and species-specific responses of pine bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to monoterpenes in association with pheromones.

    Daniel R. Miller;John H. Borden

  • Semiochemicals and bark beetle populations: Exploitation of natural phenomena by pest management strategists

    John H. Borden

  • The role of autoxidation of α-pinene in the production of pheromones of Dendroctonusponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)

    D. W. A. Hunt;J. H. Borden;B. S. Lindgren;G. Gries

  • A survey of antennal responses by five species of coniferophagous bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to bark volatiles of six species of angiosperm trees

    Dezene P.W. Huber;Regine Gries;John H. Borden;Harold D. Pierce

  • Integration of visual and olfactory cues of hosts and non-hosts by three bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)

    Stuart A. Campbell;John H. Borden

  • Quantitative variation in monoterpenes in four species of conifers

    Deepa S. Pureswaran;Regine Gries;John H. Borden

Frequent Co-Authors

René I. Alfaro
René I. Alfaro Canadian Forest Service
Therese M. Poland
Therese M. Poland US Forest Service
Allison R. Kermode
Allison R. Kermode Simon Fraser University
Mark L. Winston
Mark L. Winston Simon Fraser University
Jan E. Conn
Jan E. Conn New York State Department of Health
Jocelyn G. Millar
Jocelyn G. Millar University of California, Riverside
Volker Schurig
Volker Schurig University of Tübingen
Steven J. Seybold
Steven J. Seybold US Forest Service
Wittko Francke
Wittko Francke Universität Hamburg
Jörg Bohlmann
Jörg Bohlmann University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing John H. Borden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles