D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Biology and Biochemistry D-index 40 Citations 5,499 112 World Ranking 17932 National Ranking 24

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Organic chemistry

His primary scientific interests are in Botany, Pheromone, Bark, Host and Bark beetle. In general Botany, his work in Verbenone, PEST analysis and Sex pheromone is often linked to Attraction linking many areas of study. As a part of the same scientific study, Fredrik Schlyter usually deals with the Bark, concentrating on Animal science and frequently concerns with Pinene.

Fredrik Schlyter has included themes like Picea abies, Semiochemical and Woody plant in his Host study. As a part of the same scientific family, Fredrik Schlyter mostly works in the field of Semiochemical, focusing on Pheromone trap and, on occasion, Biological system. The Bark beetle study combines topics in areas such as Green leaf volatiles, Chemosensory protein and Horticulture.

His most cited work include:

  • Olfactory recognition and behavioural avoidance of angiosperm nonhost volatiles by conifer-inhabiting bark beetles (247 citations)
  • Intraspecific competition affecting parents and offspring in the bark beetle ips typographus (174 citations)
  • Olfactory recognition of host-tree susceptibility by pine shoot beetles (146 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Fredrik Schlyter mostly deals with Botany, Bark beetle, Pheromone, Ecology and Bark. His Botany study frequently draws parallels with other fields, such as Host. His Bark beetle research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Predator, Insect, Bark and Resistance.

His Pheromone trap study in the realm of Pheromone connects with subjects such as Myrtenol. His Ecology research focuses on Zoology and how it relates to Olfactory system, Olfaction and Noctuidae. The concepts of his Bark study are interwoven with issues in Population density, Intraspecific competition, Semiochemical and Interspecific competition.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (49.57%)
  • Bark beetle (43.59%)
  • Pheromone (36.75%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2021)?

  • Bark beetle (43.59%)
  • Ecology (37.61%)
  • Botany (49.57%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Bark beetle, Ecology, Botany, Pheromone and Host. His study with Bark beetle involves better knowledge in Bark. His Bark research includes elements of Aeration and Deciduous.

His Botany study frequently draws connections to adjacent fields such as Horticulture. His studies deal with areas such as Zoology and Sensory system as well as Pheromone. His Host study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Entomology, Windthrow, Colonisation, Threatened species and Abiotic component.

Between 2011 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Antennal transcriptome analysis of the chemosensory gene families in the tree killing bark beetles, Ips typographus and Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) (131 citations)
  • Inducibility of chemical defenses in Norway spruce bark is correlated with unsuccessful mass attacks by the spruce bark beetle (80 citations)
  • Spatial Organization of Antennal Olfactory Sensory Neurons in the Female Spodoptera littoralis Moth: Differences in Sensitivity and Temporal Characteristics (50 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Insect

Botany, Sex pheromone, Host, Pheromone and Bark beetle are his primary areas of study. He has included themes like Olfaction, Flour beetle and Generalist and specialist species in his Botany study. Fredrik Schlyter combines subjects such as Forest protection, Curculionidae, Green leaf volatiles, Bark and Chemical ecology with his study of Host.

His Bark study combines topics in areas such as Picea abies, Verbenone, Toxicology and Colonization. His Pheromone study also includes fields such as

  • Sensory system that intertwine with fields like Ecology, Intraspecific competition, Habitat and Competition,
  • Spodoptera littoralis together with Midgut, Instar and Herbivore. His study in Bark beetle is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Evolutionary biology, Odorant-binding protein, Odorant binding, Chemosensory protein and Mountain pine beetle.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Olfactory recognition and behavioural avoidance of angiosperm nonhost volatiles by conifer-inhabiting bark beetles

Qing-He Zhang;Fredrik Schlyter.
Agricultural and Forest Entomology (2004)

339 Citations

Intraspecific competition affecting parents and offspring in the bark beetle ips typographus

Olle Anderbrant;Fredrik Schlyter;Goran Birgersson.
Oikos (1985)

244 Citations

Antennal transcriptome analysis of the chemosensory gene families in the tree killing bark beetles, Ips typographus and Dendroctonus ponderosae(Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae)

Martin N Andersson;Martin N Andersson;Ewald Grosse-Wilde;Christopher I. Keeling;Jonas M. Bengtsson.
BMC Genomics (2013)

227 Citations

Olfactory recognition of host-tree susceptibility by pine shoot beetles

J. A. Byers;B. S. Lanne;J. Löfqvist;F. Schlyter.
Naturwissenschaften (1985)

207 Citations

Quantitative variation of pheromone components in the spruce bark beetleIps typographus from different attack phases.

Göran Birgersson;Fredrik Schlyter;Jan Löfqvist;Gunnar Bergström.
Journal of Chemical Ecology (1984)

181 Citations

Non-host volatiles mediate associational resistance to the pine processionary moth.

H. Jactel;G. Birgersson;S. Andersson;F. Schlyter.
Oecologia (2011)

142 Citations

Sampling range, attraction range, and effective attraction radius: estimates of trap efficiency and communication distance in coleopteran pheromone and host attractant systems

F. Schlyter.
Journal of Applied Entomology (1992)

138 Citations

Volatiles from Nonhost Birch Trees Inhibit Pheromone Response in Spruce Bark Beetles

John A. Byers;Qing-He Zhang;Fredrik Schlyter;Göran Birgersson.
Naturwissenschaften (1998)

132 Citations

Inducibility of chemical defenses in Norway spruce bark is correlated with unsuccessful mass attacks by the spruce bark beetle

Christian Schiebe;Almuth Hammerbacher;Göran Birgersson;Johanna Witzell.
Oecologia (2012)

132 Citations

Field response of spruce bark beetle,Ips typographus, to aggregation pheromone candidates.

Fredrik Schlyter;Göran Birgersson;John A. Byers;Jan Löfqvist.
Journal of Chemical Ecology (1987)

130 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Fredrik Schlyter

Hervé Jactel

Hervé Jactel

University of Bordeaux

Publications: 50

John A. Byers

John A. Byers

Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Publications: 48

John H. Borden

John H. Borden

Simon Fraser University

Publications: 44

Kenneth F. Raffa

Kenneth F. Raffa

University of Wisconsin–Madison

Publications: 43

Bill S. Hansson

Bill S. Hansson

Max Planck Society

Publications: 35

Steven J. Seybold

Steven J. Seybold

US Forest Service

Publications: 35

Peter Witzgall

Peter Witzgall

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

Publications: 27

Anna-Karin Borg-Karlson

Anna-Karin Borg-Karlson

Royal Institute of Technology

Publications: 27

Bastien Castagneyrol

Bastien Castagneyrol

University of Bordeaux

Publications: 27

Brian H. Aukema

Brian H. Aukema

University of Minnesota

Publications: 22

Andrea Battisti

Andrea Battisti

University of Padua

Publications: 21

Jean-Claude Grégoire

Jean-Claude Grégoire

Université Libre de Bruxelles

Publications: 18

Wittko Francke

Wittko Francke

Universität Hamburg

Publications: 18

Paal Krokene

Paal Krokene

Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research

Publications: 17

Jonathan Gershenzon

Jonathan Gershenzon

Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology

Publications: 17

Gary J. Blomquist

Gary J. Blomquist

University of Nevada, Reno

Publications: 17

Trending Scientists

Nasser Peyghambarian

Nasser Peyghambarian

University of Arizona

Paul D. Dresselhaus

Paul D. Dresselhaus

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Mengqing Xu

Mengqing Xu

South China Normal University

Aharon Razin

Aharon Razin

Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Yvonne-Marie Linton

Yvonne-Marie Linton

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research

Basharat Ali

Basharat Ali

Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering & Information Technology

Laura C. Harrington

Laura C. Harrington

Cornell University

Miki Nakajima

Miki Nakajima

Kanazawa University

Paul M. Yen

Paul M. Yen

Duke University

Enric Gisbert

Enric Gisbert

Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology

C. T. Pillinger

C. T. Pillinger

The Open University

Femke Lamers

Femke Lamers

Amsterdam UMC

Terry Stancin

Terry Stancin

Case Western Reserve University

Angelo Tremblay

Angelo Tremblay

Université Laval

Martin Vessey

Martin Vessey

University of Oxford

Marco Martiniello

Marco Martiniello

University of Liège

Something went wrong. Please try again later.