World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
51
Citations
7809
World Ranking
17322
National Ranking
25

Fredrik Schlyter publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fredrik Schlyter sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 132 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Fredrik Schlyter D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fredrik Schlyter sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fredrik Schlyter is affiliated with the Czech University of Life Sciences Prague in the Czech Republic. Their research focuses mainly on the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science, with a particular emphasis on insect science and ecology.

Their work encompasses several subfields, including Insect Science, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Plant Science. The main topics covered in their publications highlight areas such as Forest Insect Ecology and Management, Insect and Pesticide Research, Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control, Insect-Plant Interactions and Control, Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, and Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences.

Frequent coauthors in their research include Roman Modlinger, Rastislav Jakuš, Amit Roy, Anna Jirošová, and Amrita Chakraborty.

Fredrik Schlyter's research has been published in several venues, with multiple publications in Forest Ecology and Management and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), as well as contributions to Forests, Journal of Pest Science, and Frontiers in Microbiology.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Fredrik Schlyter include:

  • Interactions among Norway spruce, the bark beetle Ips typographus and its fungal symbionts in times of drought, 2021, Journal of Pest Science
  • Core Mycobiome and Their Ecological Relevance in the Gut of Five Ips Bark Beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), 2020, Frontiers in Microbiology
  • Unravelling the gut bacteriome of Ips (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae): identifying core bacterial assemblage and their ecological relevance, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • A highly-contiguous genome assembly of the Eurasian spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus, provides insight into a major forest pest, 2021, Communications Biology
  • The Last Trees Standing: Climate modulates tree survival factors during a prolonged bark beetle outbreak in Europe, 2022, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Best Publications

  • Olfactory recognition and behavioural avoidance of angiosperm nonhost volatiles by conifer-inhabiting bark beetles

    Qing-He Zhang;Fredrik Schlyter

  • Antennal transcriptome analysis of the chemosensory gene families in the tree killing bark beetles, Ips typographus and Dendroctonus ponderosae(Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae)

    Martin N Andersson;Martin N Andersson;Ewald Grosse-Wilde;Christopher I. Keeling;Jonas M. Bengtsson

  • Intraspecific competition affecting parents and offspring in the bark beetle ips typographus

    Olle Anderbrant;Fredrik Schlyter;Goran Birgersson

  • Olfactory recognition of host-tree susceptibility by pine shoot beetles

    J. A. Byers;B. S. Lanne;J. Löfqvist;F. Schlyter

  • Quantitative variation of pheromone components in the spruce bark beetleIps typographus from different attack phases.

    Göran Birgersson;Fredrik Schlyter;Jan Löfqvist;Gunnar Bergström

  • Inducibility of chemical defenses in Norway spruce bark is correlated with unsuccessful mass attacks by the spruce bark beetle

    Christian Schiebe;Almuth Hammerbacher;Göran Birgersson;Johanna Witzell

  • Functional evolution of Lepidoptera olfactory receptors revealed by deorphanization of a moth repertoire

    Arthur de Fouchier;Arthur de Fouchier;William B. Walker;Nicolas Montagné;Claudia Steiner;Claudia Steiner

  • Non-host volatiles mediate associational resistance to the pine processionary moth.

    H. Jactel;G. Birgersson;S. Andersson;F. Schlyter

  • Field response of spruce bark beetle,Ips typographus, to aggregation pheromone candidates.

    Fredrik Schlyter;Göran Birgersson;John A. Byers;Jan Löfqvist

  • Volatiles from Nonhost Birch Trees Inhibit Pheromone Response in Spruce Bark Beetles

    John A. Byers;Qing-He Zhang;Fredrik Schlyter;Göran Birgersson

  • Sampling range, attraction range, and effective attraction radius: estimates of trap efficiency and communication distance in coleopteran pheromone and host attractant systems

    F. Schlyter

  • Attraction to pheromone sources of different quantity, quality, and spacing: Density-regulation mechanisms in bark beetleIps typographus.

    Fredrik Schlyter;John A. Byers;Jan Löfqvist

  • Leaf Volatiles from Nonhost Deciduous Trees: Variation by Tree Species, Season and Temperature, and Electrophysiological Activity in Ips typographus

    Qing H.E. Zhang;Göran Birgersson;Junwei Zhu;Christer Löfstedt

  • Green Leaf Volatiles Interrupt Pheromone Response of Spruce Bark Beetle, Ips typographus

    Qing-He Zhang;Fredrik Schlyter;Peter Anderson

  • Behavioural sequence in the attraction of the bark beetle Ips typographus to pheromone sources

    Fredrik Schlyter;Jan Löfqvist;John A. Byers

  • Inhibition of attraction to aggregation pheromone by verbenone and ipsenol : Density regulation mechanisms in bark beetleIps typographus.

    Fredrik Schlyter;Göran Birgersson;Anders Leufvén

  • Specificity and redundancy in the olfactory system of the bark beetle Ips typographus: single-cell responses to ecologically relevant odors.

    Martin N. Andersson;Mattias C. Larsson;Fredrik Schlyter

  • Bark volatiles from nonhost angiosperm trees of spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus (L.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): Chemical and electrophysiological analysis

    Qing-He Zhang;Fredrik Schlyter;Göran Birgersson

  • Differences in attraction to semiochemicals present in sympatric pine shoot beetles, Tomicus minor and T. piniperda.

    B. S. Lanne;F. Schlyter;J. A. Byers;J. Löfqvist

  • Host‐plant use in the range expansion of the pine processionary moth, Thaumetopoea pityocampa

    Michael Stastny;Michael Stastny;Andrea Battisti;Edoardo Petrucco‐Toffolo;Fredrik Schlyter

Frequent Co-Authors

Bill S. Hansson
Bill S. Hansson Max Planck Society
Peter J. Anderson
Peter J. Anderson Monash University
John A. Byers
John A. Byers Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Olle Anderbrant
Olle Anderbrant Lund University
Christer Löfstedt
Christer Löfstedt Lund University
Mats Berglund
Mats Berglund Lund University
Torbjörn Norin
Torbjörn Norin Royal Institute of Technology
Paal Krokene
Paal Krokene Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research
Heiko Vogel
Heiko Vogel Max Planck Society
David G. Heckel
David G. Heckel Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Biology or Biochemistry, several online degrees and career paths offer flexibility and strong job prospects. One fast-growing option is medical coding, which plays a crucial role in the healthcare system. Discover what is medical coding salary and learn how this career can offer competitive pay as well as opportunities for remote work.

If you are wondering about the future outlook, the medical coding job outlook remains positive, with strong demand predicted as healthcare evolves. Pursuing a health information management degree is another smart choice. You can find a health information management degree online, which opens doors to roles in data analysis, compliance, and digital health system management.

Nutrition is another field closely tied to biology and biochemistry. Consider a cheapest online nutrition degree to help broaden your career options, whether you want to become a clinical nutritionist or work in wellness industries. These online programs provide affordable, accessible pathways for advancing your career in health and science.

Best Scientists Citing Fredrik Schlyter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles