World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 93 10960 10296 5635 5208 762 29259

Bipin N. Savani publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bipin N. Savani between 1994 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bipin N. Savani published across 33 years, from 1994 to 2026, averaging 27.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 81 publications in 2019. 39 of the 903 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 81. Peak 81 publications in 2019. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 26 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 34 publications 2013: 34 publications 2014: 46 publications 2015: 56 publications 2016: 57 publications 2017: 54 publications 2018: 56 publications 2019: 81 publications 2020: 78 publications 2021: 75 publications 2022: 58 publications 2023: 62 publications 2024: 44 publications 2025: 36 publications 2026: 3 publications
1994 2026

903 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bipin N. Savani: publications per year, 1994 to 2026
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 3
2005 13
2006 19
2007 20
2008 9
2009 26
2010 15
2011 19
2012 34
2013 34
2014 46
2015 56
2016 57
2017 54
2018 56
2019 81
2020 78
2021 75
2022 58
2023 62
2024 44
2025 36
2026 3
Total 903
Download as CSV

Bipin N. Savani publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bipin N. Savani sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 761–780 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 762 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228 762
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Bipin N. Savani D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bipin N. Savani sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 93
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bipin N. Savani is affiliated with Vanderbilt University Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions in Hematology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Oncology, Genetics, and Immunology.

The scientist's work covers key topics related to Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research, CAR-T cell therapy research, Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments, Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life, and Polyomavirus and related diseases.

Recent publications include:

  • Indications for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Immune Effector Cell Therapy: Guidelines from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, 2020, Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
  • Redefining and measuring transplant conditioning intensity in current era: a study in acute myeloid leukemia patients, 2020, Bone Marrow Transplantation
  • Standardizing Definitions of Hematopoietic Recovery, Graft Rejection, Graft Failure, Poor Graft Function, and Donor Chimerism in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Report on Behalf of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, 2021, Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
  • Clinical practice recommendation on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia patients with FLT3-internal tandem duplication: a position statement from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2020, Haematologica
  • Overview of approved CAR-T therapies, ongoing clinical trials, and its impact on clinical practice, 2021, eJHaem

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Savani include:

  • Mohamad Mohty
  • Arnon Nagler
  • Myriam Labopin
  • Bhagirathbhai Dholaria
  • Fabio Ciceri

The scientist publishes regularly in venues such as Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Bone Marrow Transplantation, Blood, British Journal of Haematology, and Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Best Publications

  • First- and second-line systemic treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease: recommendations of the American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

    Paul J. Martin;J. Douglas Rizzo;John R. Wingard;Karen Ballen

  • Revised diagnosis and severity criteria for sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease in adult patients: a new classification from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

    M. Mohty;F. Malard;M. Abecassis;E. Aerts

  • Early cytomegalovirus reactivation remains associated with increased transplant related mortality in the current era: a CIBMTR analysis

    Pierre Teira;Minoo Battiwalla;Muthalagu Ramanathan;A. John Barrett

  • High donor FOXP3-positive regulatory T-cell (Treg) content is associated with a low risk of GVHD following HLA-matched allogeneic SCT.

    Katayoun Rezvani;Stephan Mielke;Mojgan Ahmadzadeh;Yasemin Kilical

  • Indications for Autologous and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Guidelines from the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

    Navneet S. Majhail;Stephanie H. Farnia;Paul A. Carpenter;Richard E. Champlin

  • Increasing Incidence of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease in Allogeneic Transplantation: A Report from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research

    Sally Arai;Mukta Arora;Tao Wang;Tao Wang;Stephen R. Spellman

  • Leukemia-associated antigen-specific T-cell responses following combined PR1 and WT1 peptide vaccination in patients with myeloid malignancies.

    Katayoun Rezvani;Agnes S.M. Yong;Stephan Mielke;Bipin N. Savani

  • Indications for allo- and auto-SCT for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders: current practice in Europe, 2015

    A. Sureda;P. Bader;S. Cesaro;P. Dreger

  • Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease: Current situation and perspectives - A position statement from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

    M. Mohty;F. Malard;M. Abecassis;E. Aerts

  • Reduced-Intensity Transplantation for Lymphomas Using Haploidentical Related Donors Versus HLA-Matched Sibling Donors: A Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Analysis.

    Nilanjan Ghosh;Reem Karmali;Vanderson Rocha;Kwang Woo Ahn

  • Increasing use of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients aged 70 years and older in the United States

    Lori Muffly;Marcelo C. Pasquini;Michael Martens;Ruta Brazauskas

  • The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Consensus Guidelines for the Detection and Treatment of Donor-specific Anti-HLA Antibodies (DSA) in Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

    Stefan O. Ciurea;Kai Cao;Marcelo Fernadez-Vina;Piyanuch Kongtim

  • Graft-versus-leukemia effects associated with detectable Wilms tumor-1-specific T lymphocytes after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Katayoun Rezvani;Agnes S. M. Yong;Bipin N. Savani;Stephan Mielke

  • Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Mobilization for Autologous and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Guidelines from the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

    Hien K. Duong;Bipin N. Savani;Ed Copelan;Steven Devine

  • Rapid natural killer cell recovery determines outcome after T-cell-depleted HLA-identical stem cell transplantation in patients with myeloid leukemias but not with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    B N Savani;S Mielke;S Adams;M Uribe

  • National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: V. The 2014 Ancillary Therapy and Supportive Care Working Group Report

    Paul A. Carpenter;Carrie L. Kitko;Sharon Elad;Mary E.D. Flowers

  • Relapse of AML after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: methods of monitoring and preventive strategies. A review from the ALWP of the EBMT.

    P. Tsirigotis;M. Byrne;C. Schmid;Frédéric Baron

  • Use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors to prevent relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A position statement of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

    Sebastian Giebel;Anna Czyz;Oliver Ottmann;Frederic Baron

  • Improved Outcomes After Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Light Chain Amyloidosis: A Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Study

    Anita D'Souza;Angela Dispenzieri;Baldeep Wirk;Mei Jie Zhang

  • Selective depletion of alloreactive donor lymphocytes: a novel method to reduce the severity of graft-versus-host disease in older patients undergoing matched sibling donor stem cell transplantation.

    Scott R. Solomon;Stephan Mielke;Stephan Mielke;Bipin N. Savani;Bipin N. Savani;Aldemar Montero;Aldemar Montero

Frequent Co-Authors

Arnon Nagler
Arnon Nagler Sheba Medical Center
Myriam Labopin
Myriam Labopin Université Paris Cité
Hillard M. Lazarus
Hillard M. Lazarus Case Western Reserve University
Mahmoud Aljurf
Mahmoud Aljurf King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre
A. John Barrett
A. John Barrett National Institutes of Health
Fabio Ciceri
Fabio Ciceri Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Navneet S. Majhail
Navneet S. Majhail Cleveland Clinic
Gérard Socié
Gérard Socié Université Paris Cité
Harry C. Schouten
Harry C. Schouten Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn't always mean attending medical school. There are diverse, flexible online degrees that can lead to meaningful roles in healthcare. For instance, if you’re passionate about wellness and nutrition, consider earning an online nutritionist degree. This pathway enables you to work as a nutrition counselor or clinical dietitian, helping patients prevent and manage diseases through diet.

For those interested in healthcare leadership and administration, the best online mha programs develop your management skills to effectively navigate hospitals and care organizations. If you’re a registered nurse seeking career advancement, rn bsn online programs no clinicals can help you upgrade your credentials flexibly, often without on-site requirements.

Nurses who aspire to reach the highest practice level should explore the shortest msn to dnp program options. These advanced degrees can set you on a path toward leadership roles in clinical practice, policy, or academia while studying online. Each of these pathways can expand your impact within the U.S. healthcare system—even beyond the traditional MD route.

Best Scientists Citing Bipin N. Savani

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles