World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nicolaus Kröger

Nicolaus Kröger

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 115 4562 4277 248 240 991 46899

Nicolaus Kröger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nicolaus Kröger between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nicolaus Kröger published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 42.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 119 publications in 2023. 151 of the 1,307 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 119. Peak 119 publications in 2023. 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 21 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 45 publications 2010: 55 publications 2011: 47 publications 2012: 34 publications 2013: 49 publications 2014: 52 publications 2015: 68 publications 2016: 62 publications 2017: 64 publications 2018: 46 publications 2019: 88 publications 2020: 72 publications 2021: 90 publications 2022: 62 publications 2023: 119 publications 2024: 86 publications 2025: 65 publications
1995 2025

1,307 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nicolaus Kröger: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 4
1996 4
1997 4
1998 13
1999 16
2000 14
2001 14
2002 16
2003 17
2004 21
2005 18
2006 21
2007 20
2008 21
2009 45
2010 55
2011 47
2012 34
2013 49
2014 52
2015 68
2016 62
2017 64
2018 46
2019 88
2020 72
2021 90
2022 62
2023 119
2024 86
2025 65
Total 1,307
Download as CSV

Nicolaus Kröger publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicolaus Kröger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 981–1,000 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 991 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96 991
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Nicolaus Kröger D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicolaus Kröger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 114–115 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 115 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393 115
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nicolaus Kröger is affiliated with Universität Hamburg in Germany and specializes in medicine, with a principal focus on hematology. Their research encompasses an extensive body of work in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and related fields.

The main fields of study addressed in their publications include:

  • Medicine

The subfields they contribute to are:

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Genetics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Immunology

Nicolaus Kröger's research covers a range of specific topics, including:

  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Research
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
  • Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
  • CAR-T Cell Therapy Research
  • Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments

Some of the recent notable papers featuring Nicolaus Kröger's work are:

  • "Sorafenib Maintenance After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia With FLT3-Internal Tandem Duplication Mutation (SORMAIN)", 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • "Prophylaxis and management of graft versus host disease after stem-cell transplantation for haematological malignancies: updated consensus recommendations of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation", 2020, The Lancet Haematology
  • "Hematopoietic cell transplantation and cellular therapy survey of the EBMT: monitoring of activities and trends over 30 years", 2021, Bone Marrow Transplantation
  • "Management of adults and children receiving CAR T-cell therapy: 2021 best practice recommendations of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT (JACIE) and the European Haematology Association (EHA)", 2021, Annals of Oncology
  • "Indications for haematopoietic cell transplantation for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders: current practice in Europe, 2022", 2022, Bone Marrow Transplantation

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Nicolaus Kröger include:

  • Mohamad Mohty
  • Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha
  • Arnon Nagler
  • Didier Blaise
  • Myriam Labopin

The venues where Nicolaus Kröger most often publishes are:

  • Bone Marrow Transplantation
  • Blood
  • Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
  • Haematologica
  • Blood Advances

Best Publications

  • Philadelphia-Negative Classical Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Critical Concepts and Management Recommendations From European LeukemiaNet

    Tiziano Barbui;Giovanni Barosi;Gunnar Birgegard;Francisco Cervantes

  • Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: IMWG consensus perspectives risk factors for progression and guidelines for monitoring and management

    R A Kyle;B G M Durie;S V Rajkumar;O Landgren

  • Ruxolitinib in corticosteroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a multicenter survey

    R. Zeiser;A. Burchert;C. Lengerke;M.M. Verbeek

  • Sorafenib Maintenance After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia With FLT3–Internal Tandem Duplication Mutation (SORMAIN)

    Andreas Burchert;Gesine Bug;Lea V. Fritz;Jürgen Finke

  • Antilymphocyte globulin for prevention of chronic graft-versus-host disease

    Nicolaus Kröger;Carlos Solano;Christine Wolschke;Giuseppe Bandini

  • Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Europe 2014: more than 40 000 transplants annually

    Jakob Passweg;H. Baldomero;P. Bader;Chiara Bonini

  • Allogeneic stem cell transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning in patients with myelofibrosis: a prospective, multicenter study of the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

    Nicolaus Kröger;Ernst Holler;Guido Kobbe;Martin Bornhäuser

  • Revised response criteria for myelofibrosis: International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) and European LeukemiaNet (ELN) consensus report

    Ayalew Tefferi;Francisco Cervantes;Ruben Mesa;Francesco Passamonti

  • Use of haploidentical stem cell transplantation continues to increase: the 2015 European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplant activity survey report

    J R Passweg;H Baldomero;P Bader;C Bonini

  • Prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD: EBMT–ELN working group recommendations for a standardized practice

    T. Ruutu;A. Gratwohl;T. De Witte;B. Afanasyev

  • Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for MDS and CMML: recommendations from an international expert panel

    Theo De Witte;David Bowen;Marie Robin;Luca Malcovati

  • Evidence of a Graft-Versus-Leukemia Effect in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia After Reduced-Intensity Conditioning and Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation: The Cooperative German Transplant Study Group

    J. Schetelig;C. Thiede;M. Bornhäuser;R. Schwerdtfeger

  • Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Patients 50 Years or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia

    ZiYi Lim;Ronald Brand;Rodrigo Martino;Anja van Biezen

  • OUTCOME OF TRANSPLANTATION FOR MYELOFIBROSIS

    Karen K. Ballen;Smriti Shrestha;Kathleen A. Sobocinski;Mei Jie Zhang

  • Reduced-intensity conditioning versus standard conditioning before allogeneic haemopoietic cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia in first complete remission: a prospective, open-label randomised phase 3 trial.

    Martin Bornhäuser;Joachim Kienast;Rudolf Trenschel;Andreas Burchert

  • Indication and management of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in primary myelofibrosis: a consensus process by an EBMT/ELN international working group.

    N. M. Kröger;J. H. Deeg;E. Olavarria;D. Niederwieser

  • Treosulfan/fludarabine: a new conditioning regimen in allogeneic transplantation.

    J Casper;W Knauf;I Blau;T Ruutu

Frequent Co-Authors

Axel R. Zander
Axel R. Zander Huntsman Cancer Institute
Arnon Nagler
Arnon Nagler Sheba Medical Center
Jürgen Finke
Jürgen Finke University of Freiburg
Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha
Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha University of Lille
Dietger Niederwieser
Dietger Niederwieser Leipzig University
Jakob Passweg
Jakob Passweg University Hospital of Basel
Gérard Socié
Gérard Socié Université Paris Cité
Myriam Labopin
Myriam Labopin Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in Medicine doesn’t always mean attending medical school. There are a range of online degrees and career pathways designed to fast-track your entry into healthcare, or to help you specialize further. For example, if you are looking for administrative roles, online medical coding classes with financial aid offer a flexible and affordable way to build essential skills in medical billing and coding.

If becoming a registered nurse is your goal, you might want to explore absn programs that don't require teas. These accelerated nursing programs help students avoid extra entrance exams, making the application process less stressful.

For those interested in leadership or management roles in healthcare, consider enrolling in the best online healthcare administration degree programs. And, if you're a nurse looking to advance your qualifications, asn to nurse practitioner programs provide a clear path to specialized practice and higher earning potential.

Best Scientists Citing Nicolaus Kröger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles