World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Scientists 184 534 495 344 313 2186 115326
Medicine 186 299 272 191 172 2184 119584

Richard E. Champlin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard E. Champlin between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard E. Champlin published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 49.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 110 publications in 2015. 40 of the 2,209 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 110. Peak 110 publications in 2015. 1981: 5 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 15 publications 1985: 14 publications 1986: 10 publications 1987: 15 publications 1988: 12 publications 1989: 14 publications 1990: 21 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 16 publications 1993: 30 publications 1994: 31 publications 1995: 27 publications 1996: 43 publications 1997: 42 publications 1998: 24 publications 1999: 35 publications 2000: 51 publications 2001: 34 publications 2002: 34 publications 2003: 38 publications 2004: 81 publications 2005: 67 publications 2006: 83 publications 2007: 102 publications 2008: 84 publications 2009: 80 publications 2010: 75 publications 2011: 99 publications 2012: 85 publications 2013: 101 publications 2014: 72 publications 2015: 110 publications 2016: 101 publications 2017: 85 publications 2018: 75 publications 2019: 73 publications 2020: 95 publications 2021: 80 publications 2022: 47 publications 2023: 48 publications 2024: 29 publications 2025: 11 publications
1981 2025

2,209 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard E. Champlin: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 5
1982 2
1983 5
1984 15
1985 14
1986 10
1987 15
1988 12
1989 14
1990 21
1991 8
1992 16
1993 30
1994 31
1995 27
1996 43
1997 42
1998 24
1999 35
2000 51
2001 34
2002 34
2003 38
2004 81
2005 67
2006 83
2007 102
2008 84
2009 80
2010 75
2011 99
2012 85
2013 101
2014 72
2015 110
2016 101
2017 85
2018 75
2019 73
2020 95
2021 80
2022 47
2023 48
2024 29
2025 11
Total 2,209
Download as CSV

Richard E. Champlin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard E. Champlin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,796+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 2,184 publications — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100 2,184
Download as CSV

Richard E. Champlin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard E. Champlin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 186–187 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 186 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20 186
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award

Overview

Richard E. Champlin is affiliated with The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the United States. Their research focuses on medicine, with a strong emphasis on hematology and oncology. Over their career, they have contributed extensively to subfields such as hematology, oncology, immunology, molecular biology, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

Their scholarly output includes a significant number of publications across prominent topics in medical research. These include hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, acute myeloid leukemia research, CAR-T cell therapy research, acute lymphoblastic leukemia research, multiple myeloma research and treatments, immune cell function and interaction, and chronic myeloid leukemia treatments.

Richard E. Champlin has co-authored numerous studies with frequent collaborators including Elizabeth J. Shpall, Partow Kebriaei, Uday Popat, Amin M. Alousi, and Samer A. Srour. These partnerships have resulted in a substantial body of joint research work.

The scientist's publications are regularly featured in key medical journals and conference proceedings. Frequent publication venues for their work include Blood, Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Blood Advances, American Journal of Hematology, and Bone Marrow Transplantation.

Some notable recent papers include:

  • Use of CAR-Transduced Natural Killer Cells in CD19-Positive Lymphoid Tumors, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Safety, efficacy and determinants of response of allogeneic CD19-specific CAR-NK cells in CD19+ B cell tumors: a phase 1/2 trial, 2024, Nature Medicine
  • Targeting a cytokine checkpoint enhances the fitness of armored cord blood CAR-NK cells, 2020, Blood
  • Indications for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Immune Effector Cell Therapy: Guidelines from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, 2020, Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
  • Targeting the αv integrin/TGF-β axis improves natural killer cell function against glioblastoma stem cells, 2021, Journal of Clinical Investigation

Best Publications

  • Use of CAR-Transduced Natural Killer Cells in CD19-Positive Lymphoid Tumors

    Enli Liu;David Marin;Pinaki Banerjee;Homer A. Macapinlac

  • Outcomes after transplantation of cord Blood or bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with leukemia

    Mary J. Laughlin;Mary Eapen;Pablo Rubinstein;John E. Wagner

  • Donor leukocyte infusions in 140 patients with relapsed malignancy after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.

    R H Collins;O Shpilberg;W R Drobyski;D L Porter

  • Engraftment of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells With Purine Analog-Containing Chemotherapy: Harnessing Graft-Versus-Leukemia Without Myeloablative Therapy

    Sergio Giralt;Elihu Estey;Maher Albitar;Koen Van Besien

  • Transplant-lite: induction of graft-versus-malignancy using fludarabine-based nonablative chemotherapy and allogeneic blood progenitor-cell transplantation as treatment for lymphoid malignancies.

    I F Khouri;M Keating;M Körbling;D Przepiorka

  • Bone Marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells as Vehicles for Interferon-β Delivery into Tumors

    Matus Studeny;Frank C. Marini;Richard E. Champlin;Claudia Zompetta

  • Analysis of 462 transplantations from unrelated donors facilitated by the national marrow donor program

    Nancy A. Kernan;Glenn Bartsch;Robert C. Ash;Patrick G. Beatty

  • Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Potential Precursors for Tumor Stroma and Targeted-Delivery Vehicles for Anticancer Agents

    Matus Studeny;Frank C. Marini;Jennifer L. Dembinski;Claudia Zompetta

  • Hepatocytes and epithelial cells of donor origin in recipients of peripheral-blood stem cells.

    Martin Körbling;Ruth L. Katz;Abha Khanna;Arnout C. Ruifrok

  • Bone marrow transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase. Increased risk for relapse associated with T-cell depletion.

    John M. Goldman;Robert Peter Gale;Mary M. Horowitz;James C. Biggs

  • Outcomes of transplantation of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood and bone marrow in children with acute leukaemia: a comparison study

    Mary Eapen;Pablo Rubinstein;Mei Jie Zhang;Cladd Stevens

  • T-cell depletion of HLA-identical transplants in leukemia.

    AM Marmont;MM Horowitz;RP Gale;K Sobocinski

  • Diagnosis of chronic myeloid and acute lymphocytic leukemias by detection of leukemia-specific mRNA sequences amplified in vitro.

    Ernest S. Kawasaki;Steven S. Clark;Mazie Y. Coyne;Stephen D. Smith

  • Melphalan and purine analog–containing preparative regimens: reduced-intensity conditioning for patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic progenitor cell transplantation

    Sergio Giralt;Peter F. Thall;Issa Khouri;Xuemei Wang

  • Evidence that specific T lymphocytes may participate in the elimination of chronic myelogenous leukemia

    Jeffrey J. Molldrem;Peter P. Lee;Changqing Wang;Kyrie Felio

  • Zygomycosis in a Tertiary-Care Cancer Center in the Era of Aspergillus-Active Antifungal Therapy: A Case-Control Observational Study of 27 Recent Cases

    Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis;Michail S. Lionakis;Russell E. Lewis;Russell E. Lewis;Georgios Chamilos

  • Treatment of Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphocytic leukemia with hyper-CVAD and imatinib mesylate

    Deborah A. Thomas;Stefan Faderl;Jorge Cortes;Susan O'Brien

  • Blood stem cells compared with bone marrow as a source of hematopoietic cells for allogeneic transplantation

    Richard E. Champlin;Norbert Schmitz;Mary M. Horowitz;Bernard Chapuis

  • Genetic marking shows that Ph+ cells present in autologous transplants of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) contribute to relapse after autologous bone marrow in CML.

    Albert B. Deisseroth;Zhifei Zu;David Claxton;Elie G. Hanania

  • Outcomes of transplantation of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood and bone marrow in children with acute leukaemia: a comparison study. Editorial comment

    Vanderson Rocha;Eliane Gluckman;Mary Eapen;Pablo Rubinstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Elizabeth J. Shpall
Elizabeth J. Shpall The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Partow Kebriaei
Partow Kebriaei The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Sergio Giralt
Sergio Giralt Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Issa F. Khouri
Issa F. Khouri The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Borje S. Andersson
Borje S. Andersson The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Hagop M. Kantarjian
Hagop M. Kantarjian The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Laurence J.N. Cooper
Laurence J.N. Cooper The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Peter F. Thall
Peter F. Thall The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Robert Z. Orlowski
Robert Z. Orlowski The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Katayoun Rezvani
Katayoun Rezvani The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The medical field offers a variety of online degree options and career pathways beyond the traditional MD route. For those interested in pharmacy, pursuing a 3 year online pharmd provides a flexible route to becoming a licensed pharmacist, balancing affordability with professional advancement.

If you are interested in the intersection of healthcare and data management, a health information management bachelor degree online prepares graduates for vital roles managing patient information systems, ensuring data accuracy, and supporting healthcare delivery.

For those seeking fast entry into the healthcare job market, medical billing and coding online courses offer a streamlined way to learn essential administrative skills. These skills are in high demand within medical offices and insurance companies, making it a practical starting point.

Additionally, working nurses can advance their careers by enrolling in affordable np programs. Becoming a Nurse Practitioner can lead to greater autonomy and expanded role in patient care, all while studying online.

Best Scientists Citing Richard E. Champlin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles