World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
17118
World Ranking
5343
National Ranking
2923

John M. Hettema publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Hettema sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 136 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John M. Hettema D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Hettema sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John M. Hettema is affiliated with Virginia Commonwealth University in the United States. Their research spans psychology, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a strong emphasis on clinical psychology, genetics, and experimental and cognitive psychology. They have contributed extensively to the subfields of cognitive neuroscience and psychiatry and mental health.

Their work frequently addresses topics related to child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, genetic associations and epidemiology, and anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes. Other topics include tryptophan and brain disorders, functional brain connectivity studies, BRCA gene mutations in cancer, and genomics and rare diseases.

Hettema's recent publications include:

  • Baseline brain function in the preadolescents of the ABCD Study, 2021, Nature Neuroscience
  • Rates of Incidental Findings in Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Children, 2021, JAMA Neurology
  • Substance use patterns in 9-10 year olds: Baseline findings from the adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) study, 2021, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • An epigenome-wide association study of early-onset major depression in monozygotic twins, 2020, Translational Psychiatry
  • Dimensional and transdiagnostic phenotypes in psychiatric genome-wide association studies, 2023, Molecular Psychiatry

They often collaborate with a group of frequent coauthors, including:

  • Roxann Roberson-Nay
  • Chelsea Sawyers
  • Brad Verhulst
  • Thalia C. Eley
  • James M. Bjork

Hettema publishes frequently in the following venues:

  • European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research

Best Publications

  • A review and meta-analysis of the genetic epidemiology of anxiety disorders.

    John M. Hettema;Michael C. Neale;Kenneth S. Kendler

  • Childhood sexual abuse and adult psychiatric and substance use disorders in women: an epidemiological and cotwin control analysis

    Kenneth S. Kendler;Cynthia M. Bulik;Judy Silberg;John M. Hettema

  • Life event dimensions of loss, humiliation, entrapment, and danger in the prediction of onsets of major depression and generalized anxiety.

    Kenneth S. Kendler;John M. Hettema;Frank Butera;Charles O. Gardner

  • Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.

    Donald J. Hagler;Sean N. Hatton;M. Daniela Cornejo;Carolina Makowski

  • A population-based twin study of the relationship between neuroticism and internalizing disorders.

    John M Hettema;Michael C Neale;John M Myers;Carol A Prescott

  • The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for anxiety disorders in men and women.

    John M. Hettema;Carol A. Prescott;John M. Myers;Michael C. Neale

  • Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of anxiety disorders.

    T. Otowa;T. Otowa;K. Hek;M. Lee;E. M. Byrne;E. M. Byrne

  • Co-morbid major depression and generalized anxiety disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey follow-up

    Ronald C. Kessler;Michael Gruber;John M. Hettema;Irving Hwang

  • A major role for common genetic variation in anxiety disorders

    Kirstin L. Purves;Jonathan R. I. Coleman;Sandra M. Meier;Sandra M. Meier;Sandra M. Meier;Christopher Rayner

  • Meta-analysis of Genome-wide Association Studies for Neuroticism, and the Polygenic Association With Major Depressive Disorder

    Marleen H.M. De Moor;Stéphanie M. Van Den Berg;Karin J.H. Verweij;Karin J.H. Verweij;Robert F. Krueger

  • Genetic and environmental sources of covariation between generalized anxiety disorder and neuroticism.

    John M. Hettema;Carol A. Prescott;Kenneth S. Kendler

  • SIRT1 Activates MAO-A in the Brain to Mediate Anxiety and Exploratory Drive

    Sergiy Libert;Kelli Pointer;Eric L. Bell;Abhirup Das

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Clinical Features, Pathophysiology, and Treatment

    W. Victor R. Vieweg;Demetrios A. Julius;Demetrios A. Julius;Antony Fernandez;Antony Fernandez;Mary Beatty-Brooks

  • What is the genetic relationship between anxiety and depression

    John M. Hettema

  • Low extraversion and high neuroticism as indices of genetic and environmental risk for social phobia, agoraphobia, and animal phobia.

    O. Joseph Bienvenu;John M. Hettema;Michael C. Neale;Carol A. Prescott

  • A twin study of the genetics of fear conditioning.

    John M. Hettema;Peter Annas;Michael C. Neale;Kenneth S. Kendler

  • Association between glutamic acid decarboxylase genes and anxiety disorders, major depression, and neuroticism

    J M Hettema;S S An;M C Neale;J Bukszar

  • Physical similarity and the equal-environment assumption in twin studies of psychiatric disorders.

    John M. Hettema;Michael C. Neale;Kenneth S. Kendler

  • Meta-analysis of Genome-Wide Association Studies for Extraversion: Findings from the Genetics of Personality Consortium

    Stephanie M. van den Berg;Marleen H. M. de Moor;Karin J. H. Verweij;Karin J. H. Verweij;Robert F. Krueger

  • A whole genome association study of neuroticism using DNA pooling.

    S Shifman;A Bhomra;S Smiley;N R Wray

  • Citalopram, QTc Interval Prolongation, and Torsade de Pointes. How Should We Apply the Recent FDA Ruling?

    W. Victor R. Vieweg;Mehrul Hasnain;Robert H. Howland;John M. Hettema

  • Meta-Analysis of Genome-Wide Association Studies of Anxiety Disorders

    Nick Martin;Takeshi Otowa;Minyoung Lee;Catharina Hartman

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth S. Kendler
Kenneth S. Kendler Virginia Commonwealth University
Roxann Roberson-Nay
Roxann Roberson-Nay Virginia Commonwealth University
Michael C. Neale
Michael C. Neale Virginia Commonwealth University
Ellen Leibenluft
Ellen Leibenluft National Institutes of Health
Melissa A. Brotman
Melissa A. Brotman National Institutes of Health
Daniel S. Pine
Daniel S. Pine National Institutes of Health
Steven H. Aggen
Steven H. Aggen Virginia Commonwealth University
Carol A. Prescott
Carol A. Prescott University of Southern California
Dorret I. Boomsma
Dorret I. Boomsma Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Christel M. Middeldorp
Christel M. Middeldorp University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a wide range of online educational opportunities and professional career pathways. Many students consider specialized roles such as counseling or therapy, but the paths to licensure can vary greatly by location.

To become a licensed therapist in different parts of the USA, you’ll need to understand state-specific requirements. For example, if you’re interested in practicing in California, familiarize yourself with the Long Beach licensed therapist requirements or see what’s needed for the Los Angeles licensed therapist requirements.

Outside of California, requirements can differ widely. If you are considering Kentucky, look into the steps on how to become a licensed therapist in Louisville. In Texas, the process will be different again—review the licensed therapist requirements in Lubbock for more detail.

Online psychology programs can be a flexible first step, but always check the specific licensure criteria for your desired location to ensure your degree and experience will be recognized.

Best Scientists Citing John M. Hettema

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles