World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
56
Citations
12777
World Ranking
3487
National Ranking
1513

Peter C. Scacheri publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. Scacheri sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 126 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Peter C. Scacheri D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. Scacheri sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter C. Scacheri is affiliated with Case Western Reserve University in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, contributing extensively to the field through a significant number of publications. Their work spans several subfields, including Molecular Biology, Genetics, Cancer Research, Immunology, and Pharmacology.

They have contributed to the understanding of genomics and chromatin dynamics, epigenetics and DNA methylation, immune cells in cancer, RNA modifications and cancer, cancer genomics and diagnostics, microRNA in disease regulation, and genetic associations and epidemiology. These topics highlight the depth and interdisciplinary approach of their research activity.

Their publication record includes numerous papers in respected venues. Notable recent papers include:

  • Robust Hi-C Maps of Enhancer-Promoter Interactions Reveal the Function of Non-coding Genome in Neural Development and Diseases, 2020, Molecular Cell
  • Cell Type-Specific Intralocus Interactions Reveal Oligodendrocyte Mechanisms in MS, 2020, Cell
  • CHD7 promotes neural progenitor differentiation in embryonic stem cells via altered chromatin accessibility and nascent gene expression, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Distinct Cell Adhesion Signature Defines Glioblastoma Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Subsets, 2022, Cancer Research
  • Chromatin Mechanisms Driving Cancer, 2021, Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology

The frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cancer Research
  • Cell
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Neuro-Oncology

Peter C. Scacheri has collaborated extensively, with frequent co-authors including Cynthia F. Bartels, Katreya Lovrenert, Olivia Corradin, Víctor Moreno, and Ulrike Peters. These collaborations demonstrate a network of research partnerships across related fields.

Best Publications

  • Short interfering RNAs can induce unexpected and divergent changes in the levels of untargeted proteins in mammalian cells

    Peter C. Scacheri;Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen;Natasha J. Caplen;Tyra G. Wolfsberg

  • CBP-mediated acetylation of histone H3 lysine 27 antagonizes Drosophila Polycomb silencing.

    Feng Tie;Rakhee Banerjee;Carl A. Stratton;Jayashree Prasad-Sinha

  • Epigenetic signatures distinguish multiple classes of enhancers with distinct cellular functions

    Gabriel E. Zentner;Paul J. Tesar;Peter C. Scacheri

  • A mouse model of multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 1, develops multiple endocrine tumors

    Judy S. Crabtree;Peter Christopher Scacheri;Jerrold M. Ward;Lisa Garrett-Beal

  • Discovery of common and rare genetic risk variants for colorectal cancer

    Jeroen R. Huyghe;Stephanie A. Bien;Tabitha A. Harrison;Hyun Min Kang

  • Combinatorial effects of multiple enhancer variants in linkage disequilibrium dictate levels of gene expression to confer susceptibility to common traits.

    Olivia Corradin;Alina Saiakhova;Batool Akhtar-Zaidi;Lois Myeroff

  • Epigenomic enhancer profiling defines a signature of colon cancer

    Batool Akhtar-Zaidi;Batool Akhtar-Zaidi;Richard Cowper-Sal·lari;Olivia Corradin;Alina Saiakhova

  • Molecular and phenotypic aspects of CHD7 mutation in CHARGE syndrome.

    Gabriel E. Zentner;Wanda S. Layman;Donna M. Martin;Peter C. Scacheri

  • DNase-chip: A high-resolution method to identify DNase I hypersensitive sites using tiled microarrays

    Gregory E Crawford;Sean Davis;Peter C Scacheri;Gabriel Renaud

  • CHD7 Targets Active Gene Enhancer Elements to Modulate ES Cell-Specific Gene Expression

    Michael P. Schnetz;Lusy Handoko;Batool Akhtar-Zaidi;Cynthia F. Bartels

  • Genomic distribution of CHD7 on chromatin tracks H3K4 methylation patterns

    Michael P. Schnetz;Cynthia F. Bartels;Kuntal Shastri;Dheepa Balasubramanian

  • Functional Enhancers Shape Extrachromosomal Oncogene Amplifications

    Andrew R. Morton;Nergiz Dogan-Artun;Zachary J. Faber;Graham MacLeod

  • Of Mice and MEN1: Insulinomas in a Conditional Mouse Knockout

    Judy S. Crabtree;Peter C. Scacheri;Jerrold M. Ward;Sara R. McNally

  • Enhancer variants: evaluating functions in common disease

    Olivia Corradin;Peter Christopher Scacheri

  • Genome-Wide Analysis of Menin Binding Provides Insights into MEN1 Tumorigenesis

    Peter C Scacheri;Sean Davis;Duncan T Odom;Gregory E Crawford

  • ZNF143 provides sequence specificity to secure chromatin interactions at gene promoters.

    Swneke D. Bailey;Swneke D. Bailey;Xiaoyang Zhang;Xiaoyang Zhang;Kinjal Desai;Malika Aid

  • Molecular Pathology of the MEN1 Gene

    Sunita K. Agarwal;A. Lee Burns;Karen E. Sukhodolets;Patricia A. Kennedy

  • Therapeutic targeting of ependymoma as informed by oncogenic enhancer profiling

    Stephen C. Mack;Kristian W. Pajtler;Kristian W. Pajtler;Lukas Chavez;Lukas Chavez;Konstantin Okonechnikov

  • Transcription elongation factors represent in vivo cancer dependencies in glioblastoma

    Tyler E. Miller;Tyler E. Miller;Brian B. Liau;Brian B. Liau;Lisa C. Wallace;Andrew R. Morton;Andrew R. Morton

  • Discovery of common and rare genetic risk variants for colorectal cancer

    Jeroen R. Huyghe;Stephanie A. Bien;Tabitha A. Harrison;Hyun Min Kang

Frequent Co-Authors

Sanford D. Markowitz
Sanford D. Markowitz Case Western Reserve University
Jeremy N. Rich
Jeremy N. Rich University of Pittsburgh
Francis S. Collins
Francis S. Collins National Institutes of Health
Alicja Wolk
Alicja Wolk Karolinska Institute
Daniel D. Buchanan
Daniel D. Buchanan University of Melbourne
Allen M. Spiegel
Allen M. Spiegel Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Kenneth Offit
Kenneth Offit Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Jenny Chang-Claude
Jenny Chang-Claude German Cancer Research Center
Andrew T. Chan
Andrew T. Chan Harvard University
Stephen B. Gruber
Stephen B. Gruber City Of Hope National Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics in the USA opens several online education and career options in healthcare and related fields. Many students interested in Genetics also consider clinical or applied pathways, such as nursing or medical assisting, to broaden their skillset and employability.

For those seeking an online route in nursing, there are rn to bsn online with no clinicals options, which allow students to advance without the need for on-site clinical experience. If you’re looking to further your nursing credentials, the shortest msn to dnp program lets you achieve a doctoral nursing degree quickly, while dnp programs make it possible to gain higher qualifications with more flexible requirements.

Alternatively, careers such as medical assisting can be started rapidly through medical assistant programs accelerated, which are designed for quick entry into the workforce. These pathways can complement a background in Genetics, offering diverse healthcare opportunities in hospitals, research labs, and clinics.

Best Scientists Citing Peter C. Scacheri

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles