World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
106
Citations
39074
World Ranking
6569
National Ranking
3490

Stephen B. Gruber publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen B. Gruber sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 501 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Stephen B. Gruber D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen B. Gruber sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen B. Gruber is affiliated with the City Of Hope National Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions within several subfields including Genetics, Oncology, Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Cancer Research.

The major topics of their work include genetic factors in colorectal cancer, genetic associations and epidemiology, colorectal cancer screening and detection, BRCA gene mutations in cancer, cancer genomics and diagnostics, colorectal cancer treatments and studies, and cutaneous melanoma detection and management.

Among Stephen B. Gruber's recent publications are notable papers such as:

  • Physical activity and risks of breast and colorectal cancer: a Mendelian randomisation analysis, 2020, Nature Communications
  • The Prognostic Implications of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Genome-wide Modeling of Polygenic Risk Score in Colorectal Cancer Risk, 2020, The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • Transformer-based biomarker prediction from colorectal cancer histology: A large-scale multicentric study, 2023, Cancer Cell
  • Adiposity, metabolites, and colorectal cancer risk: Mendelian randomization study, 2020, BMC Medicine

They collaborate frequently with several coauthors, including Vı́ctor Moreno, Ulrike Peters, Marc J. Gunter, Gad Rennert, and Hermann Brenner, with collaborations ranging from around 57 to 70 joint works each.

Stephen B. Gruber's research output has been published in a variety of venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Cancer Research
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer—the stable evidence

    Eduardo Vilar;Stephen B. Gruber

  • Frequency and Spectrum of Cancers in the Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome

    Nicholas Hearle;Valérie Schumacher;Fred H. Menko;Sylviane Olschwang

  • Statins and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer

    Jenny N. Poynter;Stephen B. Gruber;Peter D.R. Higgins;Ronit Almog

  • Statins and cancer prevention

    Marie-France Demierre;Peter D. R. Higgins;Stephen B. Gruber;Ernest Hawk

  • Familial colorectal cancer in Ashkenazim due to a hypermutable tract in APC

    Steven J. Laken;Gloria M. Petersen;Stephen B. Gruber;Carole Oddoux

  • Network modeling links breast cancer susceptibility and centrosome dysfunction.

    Miguel Angel Pujana;Jing Dong J Han;Lea M. Starita;Kristen N. Stevens

  • Genome-wide association scan identifies a colorectal cancer susceptibility locus on 11q23 and replicates risk loci at 8q24 and 18q21.

    Albert Tenesa;Susan M Farrington;James G D Prendergast;Mary E Porteous

  • Personalized Oncology Through Integrative High-Throughput Sequencing: A Pilot Study

    Sameek Roychowdhury;Matthew K. Iyer;Dan R. Robinson;Robert J. Lonigro

  • ASCO/SSO Review of Current Role of Risk-Reducing Surgery in Common Hereditary Cancer Syndromes

    José G. Guillem;William C. Wood;Jeffrey F. Moley;Andrew Berchuck

  • Risk of pancreatic cancer in families with Lynch syndrome.

    Fay Kastrinos;Fay Kastrinos;Bhramar Mukherjee;Nabihah Tayob;Fei Wang

  • Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian.

    Mary B. Daly;Jennifer E. Axilbund;Saundra Buys;Beth Crawford

  • Discovery of common and rare genetic risk variants for colorectal cancer

    Jeroen R. Huyghe;Stephanie A. Bien;Tabitha A. Harrison;Hyun Min Kang

  • Direct evidence linking expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (92-kDa gelatinase/collagenase) to the metastatic phenotype in transformed rat embryo cells.

    Eric J. Bernhard;Stephen B. Gruber;Ruth J. Muschel

  • Identification of 12 new susceptibility loci for different histotypes of epithelial ovarian cancer

    Catherine M Phelan;Karoline B Kuchenbaecker;Karoline B Kuchenbaecker;Jonathan P Tyrer;Siddhartha P Kar

  • Prediction of Germline Mutations and Cancer Risk in the Lynch Syndrome

    Sining Chen;Wenyi Wang;Shing Lee;Khedoudja Nafa

  • Calculation of Risk of Colorectal and Endometrial Cancer Among Patients with Lynch Syndrome

    Elena Stoffel;Elena Stoffel;Bhramar Mukherjee;Victoria M. Raymond;Nabihah Tayob

  • Physical activity and risks of breast and colorectal cancer : a Mendelian randomisation analysis

    Nikos Papadimitriou;Niki Dimou;Konstantinos K. Tsilidis;Konstantinos K. Tsilidis;Barbara Banbury

  • Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Syndromes: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement of the Familial Risk–Colorectal Cancer: European Society for Medical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Elena M. Stoffel;Pamela B. Mangu;Stephen B. Gruber;Stanley R. Hamilton

  • Anti-oncogenic role of the endoplasmic reticulum differentially activated by mutations in the MAPK pathway.

    Christophe Denoyelle;George Abou-Rjaily;Vladimir Bezrookove;Monique Verhaegen

  • Founder and Recurrent CDH1 mutations in families with Hereditary diffuse gastric Cancer. Editorial

    Pardeep Kaurah;Andrée Macmillan;Niki Boyd;Janine Senz

Frequent Co-Authors

Gad Rennert
Gad Rennert Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Polly A. Newcomb
Polly A. Newcomb Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Jenny Chang-Claude
Jenny Chang-Claude German Cancer Research Center
Andrew T. Chan
Andrew T. Chan Harvard University
Graham G. Giles
Graham G. Giles University of Melbourne
Victor Moreno
Victor Moreno University of Barcelona
Kenneth Offit
Kenneth Offit Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Martha L. Slattery
Martha L. Slattery University of Utah
Michael Hoffmeister
Michael Hoffmeister German Cancer Research Center
Daniel D. Buchanan
Daniel D. Buchanan University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in Medicine in the USA but want flexible options, many related health degrees and certifications can now be earned online. These online programs are not only convenient but can be more affordable than traditional pathways.

For those aiming for advanced nursing leadership roles, the cheapest dnp programs online provide an opportunity to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice from reputable institutions while managing costs. Similarly, students interested in pharmacy careers can consider the cheapest online pharmacy school programs, which deliver comprehensive education for aspiring pharmacists.

Interested in health data and administration? Earning a health information management bachelor degree online can open doors to managing medical records, insurance, and compliance in healthcare systems. Alternatively, the growing demand for billing specialists means you could train via medical billing and coding online courses for a quick entry into the healthcare field.

Exploring these online degree options can help you find a medical or healthcare career path that matches your interests, timeline, and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen B. Gruber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles