World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
C. William Shuttleworth

C. William Shuttleworth

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 39 8368 7732 3573 3233 103 5425

C. William Shuttleworth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by C. William Shuttleworth between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. C. William Shuttleworth published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2021. 11 of the 116 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2021. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 5 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 3 publications
1988 2025

116 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
C. William Shuttleworth: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 4
1993 2
1994 1
1995 5
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 2
2002 1
2003 1
2004 2
2005 0
2006 3
2007 4
2008 3
2009 3
2010 2
2011 3
2012 6
2013 5
2014 3
2015 5
2016 3
2017 7
2018 2
2019 4
2020 5
2021 11
2022 7
2023 4
2024 8
2025 3
Total 116
Download as CSV

C. William Shuttleworth publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. William Shuttleworth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 98–107 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 103 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539 103
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

C. William Shuttleworth D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. William Shuttleworth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459 39
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

C. William Shuttleworth is affiliated with the University of New Mexico in the United States. Their research spans across medicine and neuroscience, with a strong focus on neurology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and psychiatry and mental health. Additional subfields include cognitive neuroscience and molecular biology.

The scientist's work concentrates on several key topics: neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances, ion channel regulation and function, intracranial aneurysms including their treatment and complications, migraine and headache studies, cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus, and functional brain connectivity studies.

Frequent co-authors associated with Shuttleworth include Andrew P. Carlson, K. C. Brennan, Katelyn M. Reinhart, Herbert Davis, and Thomas R. Jones.

Shuttleworth has contributed multiple research articles to several prominent venues. Among the most recurrent publication outlets are Neurocritical Care, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of Neurochemistry, Journal of Neurosurgery, and Translational Stroke Research.

Recent notable publications include:

  • The Critical Role of Spreading Depolarizations in Early Brain Injury: Consensus and Contention (2022, Neurocritical Care)
  • Brain energy metabolism: A roadmap for future research (2024, Journal of Neurochemistry)
  • Non-canonical glutamate signaling in a genetic model of migraine with aura (2020, Neuron)
  • Spreading depolarization may represent a novel mechanism for delayed fluctuating neurological deficit after chronic subdural hematoma evacuation (2020, Journal of Neurosurgery)
  • Effect of Locally Delivered Nimodipine Microparticles on Spreading Depolarization in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (2020, Neurocritical Care)

Best Publications

  • The continuum of spreading depolarizations in acute cortical lesion development: Examining Leão's legacy

    Jed A Hartings;C William Shuttleworth;Sergei A Kirov;Cenk Ayata

  • Recording, analysis, and interpretation of spreading depolarizations in neurointensive care: Review and recommendations of the COSBID research group

    Jens P. Dreier;Martin Fabricius;Cenk Ayata;Oliver W. Sakowitz

  • Co-localization of nitric oxide synthase immunoreactivity and NADPH diaphorase staining in neurons of the guinea-pig intestine.

    H. M. Young;J. B. Furness;C. W R Shuttleworth;D. S. Bredt

  • NADPH diaphorase and nitric oxide synthase colocalization in enteric neurons of canine proximal colon.

    S. M. Ward;Chun Xue;C. W. Shuttleworth;D. S. Bredt

  • Intracellular Zn2+ accumulation contributes to synaptic failure, mitochondrial depolarization, and cell death in an acute slice oxygen-glucose deprivation model of ischemia.

    Y. V. Medvedeva;B. Lin;C. W. Shuttleworth;J. H. Weiss

  • Zinc: new clues to diverse roles in brain ischemia.

    C. William Shuttleworth;John H. Weiss

  • NAD(P)H fluorescence imaging of postsynaptic neuronal activation in murine hippocampal slices.

    C. William Shuttleworth;Angela M. Brennan;John A. Connor

  • Immunohistochemical localization of 3',5'-cyclic guanosine monophosphate in the canine proximal colon: Responses to nitric oxide and electrical stimulation of enteric inhibitory neurons

    C.W. Shuttleworth;C. Xue;S.M. Ward;J. De Vente

  • Spreading depolarization in acute brain injury inhibited by ketamine: a prospective, randomized, multiple crossover trial.

    Andrew P Carlson;Mohammad Abbas;Robert L Alunday;Fares Qeadan

  • Zn2+ Influx Is Critical for Some Forms of Spreading Depression in Brain Slices

    Robert M Dietz;John H Weiss;Claude W Shuttleworth

  • NAD(P)H fluorescence transients after synaptic activity in brain slices: predominant role of mitochondrial function.

    Angela M Brennan;John A Connor;C William Shuttleworth

  • Use of NAD(P)H and flavoprotein autofluorescence transients to probe neuron and astrocyte responses to synaptic activation.

    C. William Shuttleworth

  • Neural stem/progenitor cells display a low requirement for oxidative metabolism independent of hypoxia inducible factor‐1alpha expression

    Kate M. Candelario;C. William Shuttleworth;Lee Anna Cunningham

  • Sustained NMDA receptor activation by spreading depolarizations can initiate excitotoxic injury in metabolically compromised neurons

    Isamu Aiba;C. William Shuttleworth

  • Light- and electron-microscopic immunochemical analysis of nerve fibre types innervating the taenia of the guinea-pig caecum

    J. B. Furness;S. Pompolo;C. W. R. Shuttleworth;D. E. Burleigh

  • Strain-dependent differences in calcium signaling predict excitotoxicity in murine hippocampal neurons.

    C. William R. Shuttleworth;John A. Connor

  • Multifaceted roles for astrocytes in spreading depolarization: A target for limiting spreading depolarization in acute brain injury?

    Jessica L. Seidel;Carole Escartin;Cenk Ayata;Gilles Bonvento

  • Direct visualization of trapped erythrocytes in rat brain after focal ischemia and reperfusion.

    Shimin Liu;John Connor;Steven Peterson;C William Shuttleworth

  • Calcium-dependent NMDA-induced dendritic injury and MAP2 loss in acute hippocampal slices

    M.M. Hoskison;Y. Yanagawa;K. Obata;C.W. Shuttleworth

  • Microtubule disruption, not calpain-dependent loss of MAP2, contributes to enduring NMDA-induced dendritic dysfunction in acute hippocampal slices.

    M.M. Hoskison;C. William Shuttleworth

  • Direct current electrocorticography for clinical neuromonitoring of spreading depolarizations.

    Jed A Hartings;Chunyan Li;Chunyan Li;Jason M Hinzman;C William Shuttleworth

  • Localized Loss of Ca2+ Homeostasis in Neuronal Dendrites Is a Downstream Consequence of Metabolic Compromise during Extended NMDA Exposures

    Thomas A. Vander Jagt;John A. Connor;C. William Shuttleworth

  • Non-canonical glutamate signaling in a genetic model of migraine with aura.

    Patrick D. Parker;Pratyush Suryavanshi;Marcello Melone;Punam A. Sawant-Pokam

Frequent Co-Authors

John A. Connor
John A. Connor University of New Mexico
Jed A. Hartings
Jed A. Hartings University of Cincinnati
Jens P. Dreier
Jens P. Dreier Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Cenk Ayata
Cenk Ayata Harvard University
Martin Fabricius
Martin Fabricius University of Copenhagen
Sergei A. Kirov
Sergei A. Kirov Augusta University
John H. Weiss
John H. Weiss University of California, Irvine
Gilles Bonvento
Gilles Bonvento University of Paris-Saclay
Marcello Melone
Marcello Melone Marche Polytechnic University
Brian A. MacVicar
Brian A. MacVicar University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience opens doors to a diverse range of advanced degrees and career paths, many of which can now be pursued online. For students interested in behavioral health or social services, there are options like the cheapest msw programs in the country, which provide a foundation for clinical or research-focused roles without breaking the bank.

Those aiming to specialize in applied behavior analysis, a field closely linked to neuroscience and psychology, might choose to look at online bcba programs. These programs equip graduates for certification and specialized practice.

For learners who want to fast-track their studies, there are accelerated msw programs, as well as accelerated psychology degree online options. These allow for quicker entry into the workforce and potential career advancement.

Whether you’re seeking affordability, specialization, or an expedited academic journey, there are flexible online programs aligned with neuroscience career interests.

Best Scientists Citing C. William Shuttleworth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles