World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
14327
World Ranking
5031
National Ranking
31

Martin Fabricius publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Fabricius sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 151 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Martin Fabricius D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Fabricius sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Fabricius is affiliated with Copenhagen University Hospital in Denmark and specializes primarily in the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Neurology. Their research contributions span subfields including Emergency Medicine, Epidemiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The scientific topics most frequently covered in Fabricius's work include:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Fabricius has published extensively, with key recent papers including:

  • "Machine learning algorithms performed no better than regression models for prognostication in traumatic brain injury," 2020, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • "Differences between Men and Women in Treatment and Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury," 2020, Journal of Neurotrauma
  • "Pathological Computed Tomography Features Associated With Adverse Outcomes After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury," 2021, JAMA Neurology
  • "Serum metabolome associated with severity of acute traumatic brain injury," 2022, Nature Communications
  • "Surgery versus conservative treatment for traumatic acute subdural haematoma: a prospective, multicentre, observational, comparative effectiveness study," 2022, The Lancet Neurology

Frequent publication venues where Fabricius has contributed include:

  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Intensive Care Medicine
  • The Lancet Neurology
  • Neurocritical Care
  • Scientific Reports

Collaborative work is also a notable component of Fabricius's scientific output. The scientist has frequently co-authored with:

  • Giuseppe Citerio
  • D. James Cooper
  • Ari Ercole
  • Bart Depreitere
  • Endre Czeiter

Best Publications

  • Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research

    Andrew I R Maas;David K Menon;P David Adelson;Nada Andelic

  • Clinical Relevance of Cortical Spreading Depression in Neurological Disorders: Migraine, Malignant Stroke, Subarachnoid and Intracranial Hemorrhage, and Traumatic Brain Injury:

    Martin Lauritzen;Jens Peter Dreier;Martin Fabricius;Jed A Hartings

  • Delayed ischaemic neurological deficits after subarachnoid haemorrhage are associated with clusters of spreading depolarizations

    Jens P Dreier;Johannes Woitzik;Martin Fabricius;Robin Bhatia

  • Cortical spreading ischaemia is a novel process involved in ischaemic damage in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

    Jens P. Dreier;Sebastian Major;Andrew Manning;Johannes Woitzik

  • Cortical spreading depression and peri-infarct depolarization in acutely injured human cerebral cortex

    Martin Fabricius;Susanne Fuhr;Robin Bhatia;Martyn Boutelle

  • Spreading and Synchronous Depressions of Cortical Activity in Acutely Injured Human Brain

    Anthony J. Strong;Martin Fabricius;Martyn G. Boutelle;Stuart J. Hibbins

  • Spreading depolarizations occur in human ischemic stroke with high incidence.

    Christian Dohmen;Oliver W. Sakowitz;Martin Fabricius;Bert Bosche

  • Case-mix, care pathways, and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury in CENTER-TBI: a European prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, cohort study

    Ewout W. Steyerberg;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Eveline Wiegers;Charlie Sewalt;Andras Buki

  • The continuum of spreading depolarizations in acute cortical lesion development: Examining Leão's legacy

    Jed A Hartings;C William Shuttleworth;Sergei A Kirov;Cenk Ayata

  • Recording, analysis, and interpretation of spreading depolarizations in neurointensive care: Review and recommendations of the COSBID research group

    Jens P. Dreier;Martin Fabricius;Cenk Ayata;Oliver W. Sakowitz

  • Spreading depolarisations and outcome after traumatic brain injury: a prospective observational study

    Jed A. Hartings;M. Ross Bullock;David O. Okonkwo;Lilian S. Murray

  • Preserved consciousness in vegetative and minimal conscious states: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Daniel Kondziella;Christian K Friberg;Vibe G Frokjaer;Martin Fabricius

  • Spreading convulsions, spreading depolarization and epileptogenesis in human cerebral cortex

    Jens P. Dreier;Sebastian Major;Heinz-Wolfgang Pannek;Johannes Woitzik

  • Association of seizures with cortical spreading depression and peri-infarct depolarisations in the acutely injured human brain.

    Martin Fabricius;Susanne Fuhr;Susanne Fuhr;Lisette Willumsen;Jens P. Dreier

  • Spreading depolarizations and late secondary insults after traumatic brain injury.

    Jed A. Hartings;Anthony J. Strong;Martin Fabricius;Andrew Manning

  • Spreading depolarizations have prolonged direct current shifts and are associated with poor outcome in brain trauma

    Jed A. Hartings;Tomas Watanabe;M. Ross Bullock;David O. Okonkwo

  • Microdialysis of interstitial amino acids during spreading depression and anoxic depolarization in rat neocortex

    Martin Fabricius;Leif H. Jensen;Martin Lauritzen

  • Dynamic changes in brain glucose and lactate in pericontusional areas of the human cerebral cortex, monitored with rapid sampling on-line microdialysis: relationship with depolarisation-like events.

    Mark C. Parkin;Sarah E. Hopwood;Sarah E. Hopwood;Deborah A. Jones;Parastoo Hashemi

  • Importance of nitric oxide for local increases of blood flow in rat cerebellar cortex during electrical stimulation.

    Nuran Akgoren;Martin Fabricius;Martin Lauritzen

  • Preliminary Evidence That Ketamine Inhibits Spreading Depolarizations in Acute Human Brain Injury

    Oliver W. Sakowitz;Karl L. Kiening;Kara L. Krajewski;Asita S. Sarrafzadeh

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Lauritzen
Martin Lauritzen University of Copenhagen
Sándor Beniczky
Sándor Beniczky Aarhus University Hospital
Jens P. Dreier
Jens P. Dreier Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Jed A. Hartings
Jed A. Hartings University of Cincinnati
Guido Rubboli
Guido Rubboli University of Copenhagen
Lars H. Pinborg
Lars H. Pinborg Copenhagen University Hospital
Peter Wolf
Peter Wolf Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Ingmar Rosén
Ingmar Rosén Lund University
Eugen Trinka
Eugen Trinka Paracelsus Medical University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience can open doors to a range of rewarding careers in mental health, research, education, and therapy. If you’re exploring flexible education options, there are several related online degrees that can complement or enhance your neuroscience background.

For students interested in social work or behavioral health, msw programs offer broad training to support individuals and communities. Those who want to specialize in behavioral analysis can pursue bcba master's programs online, leading to jobs as Board Certified Behavior Analysts working in clinical, educational, or research settings.

Many learners seek fast-paced options. msw accelerated programs provide an opportunity to complete training quickly, while psychology degree online programs offer a flexible path toward roles in counseling, mental health, and research. These online pathways can help kickstart or advance your career alongside neuroscience studies, all while accommodating your schedule and needs.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Fabricius

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles