World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Materials Science

D-Index
65
Citations
21070
World Ranking
5520
National Ranking
181

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
67
Citations
21566
World Ranking
1272
National Ranking
78

Kylie R. Catchpole publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kylie R. Catchpole sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 201 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Kylie R. Catchpole D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kylie R. Catchpole sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kylie R. Catchpole is affiliated with the Australian National University in Australia, specializing in research primarily within the fields of Engineering and Materials Science. Their scholarly work comprises over a hundred publications, with significant emphasis on electrical and electronic engineering and materials chemistry.

The scientist's research spans several subfields, including:

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Materials Chemistry
  • Polymers and Plastics
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Key topics in Catchpole's research include:

  • Perovskite Materials and Applications
  • Conducting polymers and applications
  • Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
  • Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
  • Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
  • Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques

Their recent notable papers cover a range of areas related to solar energy and hydrogen storage. These include:

  • The 2020 photovoltaic technologies roadmap (2020), published in the Journal of Physics D Applied Physics
  • Nanoscale localized contacts for high fill factors in polymer-passivated perovskite solar cells (2021), Science
  • Stability challenges for the commercialization of perovskite-silicon tandem solar cells (2023), Nature Reviews Materials
  • Centimetre-scale perovskite solar cells with fill factors of more than 86 per cent (2022), Nature
  • Large-scale stationary hydrogen storage via liquid organic hydrogen carriers (2021), iScience

Catchpole has frequently collaborated with several researchers, including:

  • Klaus Weber
  • The Duong
  • Thomas P. White
  • Heping Shen
  • Hieu T. Nguyen

The scientist's work is published frequently in specialized journals such as:

  • Advanced Energy Materials
  • Solar RRL
  • Energy & Environmental Science
  • Journal of Materials Chemistry A
  • Advanced Functional Materials

Best Publications

  • Surface plasmon enhanced silicon solar cells

    S. Pillai;K. R. Catchpole;T. Trupke;M. A. Green

  • Plasmonic solar cells

    Kylie Catchpole;Albert Polman

  • Third Generation Photovoltaics

    K.R. Catchpole;M.A. Green

  • Design principles for particle plasmon enhanced solar cells

    K. R. Catchpole;A. Polman

  • Tunable light trapping for solar cells using localized surface plasmons

    Fiona Beck;A Polman;K. R Catchpole

  • Rubidium Multication Perovskite with Optimized Bandgap for Perovskite-Silicon Tandem with over 26% Efficiency

    YiLiang Wu;Heping Shen;Jun Peng

  • A Universal Double‐Side Passivation for High Open‐Circuit Voltage in Perovskite Solar Cells: Role of Carbonyl Groups in Poly(methyl methacrylate)

    Jun Peng;Jafar Iqbal Khan;Wenzhu Liu;Esma Ugur

  • Interface passivation using ultrathin polymer–fullerene films for high-efficiency perovskite solar cells with negligible hysteresis

    Jun Peng;Yiliang Wu;Wang Ye;Daniel A. Jacobs

  • Stability challenges for the commercialization of perovskite–silicon tandem solar cells

    Unknown

  • The 2020 photovoltaic technologies roadmap

    Gregory M Wilson;Mowafak Al-Jassim;Wyatt K Metzger;Stefan W Glunz;Stefan W Glunz

  • Nanophotonic light trapping in solar cells

    Sudha Mokkapati;K. R. Catchpole

  • Nanoscale localized contacts for high fill factors in polymer-passivated perovskite solar cells

    Jun Peng;Daniel Walter;Yuhao Ren;Mike Tebyetekerwa

  • Centimetre-scale perovskite solar cells with fill factors of more than 86 per cent

    Unknown

  • Enhanced emission from Si-based light-emitting diodes using surface plasmons

    S. Pillai;K. R. Catchpole;T. Trupke;G. Zhang

  • Designing periodic arrays of metal nanoparticles for light-trapping applications in solar cells

    Sudha Mokkapati;F. J. Beck;A. Polman;K. R. Catchpole

  • Plasmon-enhanced internal photoemission for photovoltaics: Theoretical efficiency limits

    Thomas P. White;Kylie R. Catchpole

  • Mechanically-stacked perovskite/CIGS tandem solar cells with efficiency of 23.9% and reduced oxygen sensitivity

    Heping Shen;Jun Peng;Daniel A. Jacobs

  • Monolithic perovskite/silicon-homojunction tandem solar cell with over 22% efficiency

    YiLiang Wu;Di Yan;Jun Peng

  • Large-scale stationary hydrogen storage via liquid organic hydrogen carriers.

    Zainul Abdin;Chunguang Tang;Yun Liu;Kylie Catchpole

  • Tandem Solar Cells Based on High-Efficiency c-Si Bottom Cells: Top Cell Requirements for >30% Efficiency

    Thomas P. White;Niraj N. Lal;Kylie R. Catchpole

  • Hysteresis phenomena in perovskite solar cells: the many and varied effects of ionic accumulation

    Daniel A. Jacobs;Yiliang Wu;Heping Shen;Chog Barugkin

  • Asymmetry in photocurrent enhancement by plasmonic nanoparticle arrays located on the front or on the rear of solar cells

    F. J. Beck;Sudha Mokkapati;A. Polman;K. R. Catchpole

  • Efficient Indium-Doped TiOxElectron Transport Layers for High-Performance Perovskite Solar Cells and Perovskite-Silicon Tandems

    Jun Peng;Xianzhong Zhou;Heping Shen

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas P. White
Thomas P. White Australian National University
Klaus Weber
Klaus Weber Australian National University
Heping Shen
Heping Shen Australian National University
Jun Peng
Jun Peng Australian National University
Andrew Blakers
Andrew Blakers Australian National University
Martin A. Green
Martin A. Green University of New South Wales
Albert Polman
Albert Polman Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics
Daniel Macdonald
Daniel Macdonald Australian National University
Yimao Wan
Yimao Wan Australian National University
Anita Ho-Baillie
Anita Ho-Baillie University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Engineering and Technology is rapidly evolving, creating new opportunities for students interested in online degrees. Many are exploring specialized ux degree programs to gain hands-on skills in user experience design, a critical component in today’s tech-driven world. These programs offer flexibility and affordability, making them a popular choice for those looking to break into the tech industry.

Project management is another valuable pathway. Students often ask, is a bachelor degree in project management worth it? For many, the answer is yes. These degrees prepare graduates to lead teams and handle the complexities of engineering projects, improving career prospects in both technology and business sectors.

With advancements in digital finance, interest is also growing in pursuing a masters in blockchain online. This degree can open doors to fast-growing careers in cryptocurrency, fintech, and secure software systems.

Lastly, those interested in the intersection of technology and sports may consider online sports management degrees. These programs blend technical know-how with business skills, preparing graduates for leadership roles in the booming sports industry.

Best Scientists Citing Kylie R. Catchpole

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles