World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar

Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
32
Citations
3715
World Ranking
9548
National Ranking
259

Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 92 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research spans across multiple fields with a primary focus on Medicine and Neuroscience, having published extensively in subfields such as Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Emergency Medicine, and Rheumatology.

The scientist's work addresses a variety of topics, notably:

  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar has contributed to recent publications including:

  • "EEG reactivity testing for prediction of good outcome in patients after cardiac arrest" (2020) published in Neurology
  • "Cerebello-thalamic activity drives an abnormal motor network into dystonic tremor" (2021) published in NeuroImage Clinical
  • "SSEP amplitudes add information for prognostication in postanoxic coma" (2021) published in Resuscitation
  • "Structural and functional correlates of subthalamic deep brain stimulation-induced apathy in Parkinson's disease" (2020) published in Brain Stimulation
  • "Motor effects of deep brain stimulation correlate with increased functional connectivity in Parkinson's disease: An MEG study" (2020) published in NeuroImage Clinical

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as Resuscitation, Movement Disorders Clinical Practice, Clinical Neurophysiology, Neurology, and NeuroImage Clinical.

Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar often collaborates with several coauthors, including:

  • Rob M.A. de Bie
  • Janneke Horn
  • Arthur W.G. Buijink
  • Marjolein M. Admiraal
  • Wouter V. Potters

Best Publications

  • Standardized EEG interpretation accurately predicts prognosis after cardiac arrest

    Erik Westhall;Andrea O. Rossetti;Anne Fleur Van Rootselaar;Troels Wesenberg Kjaer

  • Neuroimaging essentials in essential tremor: A systematic review

    Sarvi Sharifi;Aart J. Nederveen;Jan Booij;Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar

  • Interrater variability of EEG interpretation in comatose cardiac arrest patients.

    Erik Westhall;Ingmar Rosén;Andrea O. Rossetti;Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar

  • Motor network disruption in essential tremor: a functional and effective connectivity study.

    Arthur W. G. Buijink;A. M. Madelein van der Stouwe;Marja Broersma;Sarvi Sharifi

  • Unstable TTTTA/TTTCA expansions in MARCH6 are associated with Familial Adult Myoclonic Epilepsy type 3

    Rahel T. Florian;Florian Kraft;Elsa Leitão;Sabine Kaya

  • Intronic ATTTC repeat expansions in STARD7 in familial adult myoclonic epilepsy linked to chromosome 2

    Mark A. Corbett;Thessa Kroes;Liana Veneziano;Mark F. Bennett;Mark F. Bennett

  • Propriospinal myoclonus: clinical reappraisal and review of literature.

    Sandra M. A. van der Salm;Roberto Erro;Carla Cordivari;Mark J. Edwards

  • Familial cortical myoclonic tremor with epilepsy: A single syndromic classification for a group of pedigrees bearing common features

    Anne-Fleur Van Rootselaar;Ivo N. van Schaik;Arn M.J.M. van den Maagdenberg;Johannes H.T.M. Koelman

  • The bereitschaftspotential in jerky movement disorders

    Sandra M. A. van der Salm;Marina A. J. Tijssen;Johannes H. T. M. Koelman;Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar

  • Top-down-directed synchrony from medial frontal cortex to nucleus accumbens during reward anticipation.

    Michael X. Cohen;Michael X. Cohen;Lo Bour;Mariska Mantione;Martijn Figee

  • Axial jerks: a clinical spectrum ranging from propriospinal to psychogenic myoclonus

    Sandra M. A. van der Salm;Johannes H. T. M. Koelman;Samantha Henneke;Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar

  • The eye of the beholder: inter-rater agreement among experts on psychogenic jerky movement disorders

    Sandra M A van der Salm;Rob J de Haan;Daniëlle C Cath;Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar

  • Treatment of electroencephalographic status epilepticus after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (TELSTAR): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

    Barry J. Ruijter;Michel J. A. M. van Putten;Michel J. A. M. van Putten;Janneke Horn;Michiel J. Blans

  • The paroxysmal dyskinesias

    Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar;S Schade van Westrum;Maj Tijssen;Demetrios N Velis

  • Familial cortical tremor with epilepsy and cerebellar pathological findings

    Anne Fleur van Rootselaar;Eleonora Aronica;Ernst N.H. Jansen Steur;Johanna M. Rozemuller-Kwakkel

  • Coherence analysis differentiates between cortical myoclonic tremor and essential tremor.

    Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar;Natasha M. Maurits;Johannes H.T.M. Koelman;Johannes H. van der Hoeven

  • Electroencephalographic reactivity as predictor of neurological outcome in postanoxic coma: A multicenter prospective cohort study.

    Marjolein M. Admiraal;Anne Fleur van Rootselaar;Jeannette Hofmeijer;Cornelia W.E. Hoedemaekers

  • Decreased cortical inhibition and yet cerebellar pathology in ‘familial cortical myoclonic tremor with epilepsy’

    Anne Fleur Van Rootselaar;Sandra M.A. Van Der Salm;Lo J. Bour;Mark J. Edwards

  • Simultaneous EMG-functional MRI recordings can directly relate hyperkinetic movements to brain activity.

    Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar;Natasha M. Maurits;Remco Renken;Johannes H. T. M. Koelman

  • Bilateral cerebellar activation in unilaterally challenged essential tremor

    Marja Broersma;Anna M. M. van der Stouwe;Arthur W. G. Buijink;Bauke M. de Jong

  • Genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity in sporadic and familial forms of paroxysmal dyskinesia

    Alexander J. A. Groffen;Thom Klapwijk;Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar;Justus L. Groen

Frequent Co-Authors

Marina A.J. Tijssen
Marina A.J. Tijssen University Medical Center Groningen
Johannes H.T.M. Koelman
Johannes H.T.M. Koelman University of Amsterdam
Lo J. Bour
Lo J. Bour University of Amsterdam
Natasha M. Maurits
Natasha M. Maurits University of Groningen
Rob M.A. de Bie
Rob M.A. de Bie University of Amsterdam
Michel J. A. M. van Putten
Michel J. A. M. van Putten University of Twente
Karl Martin Klein
Karl Martin Klein University of Calgary
Arn M. J. M. van den Maagdenberg
Arn M. J. M. van den Maagdenberg Leiden University Medical Center
Danielle C. Cath
Danielle C. Cath Utrecht University
Christel Depienne
Christel Depienne Essen University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens doors to a variety of educational and career options. Many students pursue an online accelerated bachelor's degree in neuroscience or related fields for a faster track toward graduation and entry into the workforce.

Choosing the right major is crucial—neuroscience intersects with some of the best majors in college such as biology, psychology, and biomedical engineering. These fields can boost your earning potential and open doors to high-growth industries.

If you’re considering your return on investment, neuroscience aligns closely with what might be considered the most valuable degree in the world by offering versatile skills for careers in research, medicine, pharmaceuticals, and tech.

Cost is often a concern, but there are online colleges that take financial aid, making these pathways more accessible for students from varying financial backgrounds. Online study options increase flexibility, affordability, and access to quality education in neuroscience and related disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles