World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
116
Citations
44587
World Ranking
601
National Ranking
253

Scott E. Denmark publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott E. Denmark sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 614 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Scott E. Denmark D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott E. Denmark sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 116 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Ryoji Noyori Prize, Society of Synthetic Organic Chemistry
  • 2018 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2017 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2009 - Fellow of the American Chemical Society
  • 1991 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1985 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Scott E. Denmark is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, with a primary focus on Chemistry and Materials Science. Within these broad fields, they have contributed extensively to subfields including Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

The scientist has concentrated research efforts on topics such as Crystallization and Solubility Studies, X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography, Chemical Synthesis and Reactions, Catalytic C-H Functionalization Methods, Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques, Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions, and Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis.

Their recent research publications include:

  • "A machine-learning tool to predict substrate-adaptive conditions for Pd-catalyzed C-N couplings" (2023) published in Science
  • "Catalytic, Enantioselective Sulfenofunctionalization of Alkenes: Development and Recent Advances" (2020) published in Angewandte Chemie International Edition
  • "Development of a Computer-Guided Workflow for Catalyst Optimization. Descriptor Validation, Subset Selection, and Training Set Analysis" (2020) published in Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • "Demystifying the asymmetry-amplifying, autocatalytic behaviour of the Soai reaction through structural, mechanistic and computational studies" (2020) published in Nature Chemistry
  • "Heteroaryl-Heteroaryl, Suzuki-Miyaura, Anhydrous Cross-Coupling Reactions Enabled by Trimethyl Borate" (2021) published in Journal of the American Chemical Society

Scott E. Denmark has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Casey L. Olen
  • Andrew F. Zahrt
  • Connor P. Delaney
  • Jeremy Henle
  • N. Ian Rinehart

Their work has been published repeatedly in prominent venues such as:

  • The Cambridge Structural Database
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • The Journal of Organic Chemistry
  • Organic Syntheses
  • Science

Throughout their career, Scott E. Denmark has received a number of awards and honors, including:

  • Ryoji Noyori Prize, Society of Synthetic Organic Chemistry (2019)
  • Member of the National Academy of Sciences (2018)
  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (2017)
  • Fellow of the American Chemical Society (2009)
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1991)
  • Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (1985)

Best Publications

  • Catalytic Enantioselective Addition of Allylic Organometallic Reagents to Aldehydes and Ketones

    Scott E. Denmark;Jiping Fu

  • Lewis Base Catalysis in Organic Synthesis

    Scott E. Denmark;Gregory L. Beutner

  • Tandem [4+2]/[3+2] Cycloadditions of Nitroalkenes.

    Scott E. Denmark;Atli Thorarensen

  • Palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of organosilanols and their salts: practical alternatives to boron- and tin-based methods.

    Scott E. Denmark;Christopher S. Regens

  • Catalytic, Asymmetric Halofunctionalization of Alkenes—A Critical Perspective

    Scott E. Denmark;William E. Kuester;Matthew T. Burk

  • Prediction of higher-selectivity catalysts by computer-driven workflow and machine learning

    Andrew F. Zahrt;Jeremy J. Henle;Brennan T. Rose;Yang Wang

  • Design and Implementation of New, Silicon-Based, Cross-Coupling Reactions: Importance of Silicon−Oxygen Bonds

    Scott E. Denmark;Ramzi F. Sweis

  • Catalytic, Enantioselective, Vinylogous Aldol Reactions

    Scott E. Denmark;John R. Heemstra;Gregory L. Beutner

  • Asymmetric catalysis of aldol reactions with chiral lewis bases.

    Scott E. Denmark;Robert A. Stavenger

  • Lewis‐Base‐Katalyse in der organischen Synthese

    Scott E. Denmark;Gregory L. Beutner

  • Cyclopropanation with Diazomethane and Bis(oxazoline)palladium(II) Complexes.

    Scott E. Denmark;Robert A. Stavenger;and Anne-Marie Faucher;James P. Edwards

  • Pre-transmetalation intermediates in the Suzuki-Miyaura reaction revealed: The missing link

    Andy A. Thomas;Scott E. Denmark

  • Silicon‐Based Cross‐Coupling Reactions in the Total Synthesis of Natural Products

    Scott E. Denmark;Jack H.-C. Liu

  • Lewis base catalysis of bromo- and iodolactonization, and cycloetherification

    Scott E. Denmark;Matthew T. Burk

  • Catalytic Epoxidation of Alkenes with Oxone

    Scott E. Denmark;David C. Forbes;David S. Hays;Jeffrey S. DePue

  • Asymmetric Allylation of Aldehydes with Chiral Lewis Bases

    Scott E. Denmark;Diane M. Coe;Norman E. Pratt;Brian D. Griedel

  • A comparison of (chloromethyl)- and (iodomethyl)zinc cyclopropanation reagents

    Scott E. Denmark;James P. Edwards

  • Lewis base activation of Lewis acids: catalytic, enantioselective addition of silyl ketene acetals to aldehydes.

    Scott E. Denmark;Gregory L. Beutner;Thomas Wynn;Martin D. Eastgate

  • Enantioselective bromocycloetherification by Lewis base/chiral Brønsted acid cooperative catalysis.

    Scott E. Denmark;Matthew T. Burk

  • Catalytic asymmetric synthesis

    Scott E. Denmark;Eric N. Jacobsen

  • Tandem (4 + 2)/(3 + 2) Cycloadditions of Nitroalkenes. Part 13. The Synthesis of (‐)‐Detoxinine.

    S. E. Denmark;A. R. Hurd;H. J. Sacha

Frequent Co-Authors

Ken-Tsung Wong
Ken-Tsung Wong National Taiwan University
Scott R. Wilson
Scott R. Wilson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Timothy M. Willson
Timothy M. Willson University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Christopher J. Cramer
Christopher J. Cramer UL Research Institutes
Thomas A. Wynn
Thomas A. Wynn Pfizer (United States)
Jay S. Siegel
Jay S. Siegel Tianjin University
Andreas Pfaltz
Andreas Pfaltz University of Basel
Rajendra Rathore
Rajendra Rathore Marquette University
Hidetoshi Tokuyama
Hidetoshi Tokuyama Tohoku University
Tohru Fukuyama
Tohru Fukuyama Nagoya University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Chemistry in the USA, exploring related degrees can open diverse career pathways. For example, careers in forensic science merge chemical analysis with criminal investigations, providing an exciting application of chemistry skills in law enforcement. Understanding the financial commitment is also important; researching how much is criminal justice school helps prospective students plan their education budget effectively.

Online programs offer flexible options for those interested in criminal justice careers. The best online associate degree programs in criminal justice provide accessible entry points that can complement a chemistry background, especially for roles in forensic laboratories or crime scene analysis. Additionally, students may consider legal professions connected to scientific evidence, such as paralegal work. Knowing what types of paralegals make the most money can guide career decisions after completing related degrees.

Integrating chemistry with these interdisciplinary fields enhances employability and widens professional options. By exploring educational programs and career insights found through these linked resources, students can make informed decisions about their future paths.

Learn more about careers in forensics, discover how much is criminal justice school, check out the best online associate degree programs in criminal justice, and see what types of paralegals make the most money.

Best Scientists Citing Scott E. Denmark

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles