World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Medicine
USA
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Scientists 184 527 488 340 309 1994 134918
Medicine 195 215 196 144 130 1996 147761

Jorge E. Cortes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jorge E. Cortes between 1980 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jorge E. Cortes published across 47 years, from 1980 to 2026, averaging 51.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 170 publications in 2013. 64 of the 2,422 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 170. Peak 170 publications in 2013. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 20 publications 1999: 42 publications 2000: 24 publications 2001: 58 publications 2002: 50 publications 2003: 79 publications 2004: 67 publications 2005: 73 publications 2006: 105 publications 2007: 124 publications 2008: 135 publications 2009: 125 publications 2010: 136 publications 2011: 163 publications 2012: 156 publications 2013: 170 publications 2014: 152 publications 2015: 146 publications 2016: 95 publications 2017: 29 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 120 publications 2023: 135 publications 2024: 106 publications 2025: 63 publications 2026: 1 publication
1980 2026

2,422 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jorge E. Cortes: publications per year, 1980 to 2026
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 2
1994 7
1995 9
1996 6
1997 9
1998 20
1999 42
2000 24
2001 58
2002 50
2003 79
2004 67
2005 73
2006 105
2007 124
2008 135
2009 125
2010 136
2011 163
2012 156
2013 170
2014 152
2015 146
2016 95
2017 29
2018 10
2019 1
2020 0
2021 2
2022 120
2023 135
2024 106
2025 63
2026 1
Total 2,422
Download as CSV

Jorge E. Cortes publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jorge E. Cortes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,796+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,996 publications — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100 1,996
Download as CSV

Jorge E. Cortes D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jorge E. Cortes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 194–195 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 195 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12 195
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in United States Leader Award

Overview

Jorge E. Cortes is affiliated with Augusta University in the United States and has a research portfolio spanning engineering and computer science. Their work predominantly focuses on control and systems engineering and electrical and electronic engineering, with significant contributions in computer networks and communications, artificial intelligence, and statistical and nonlinear physics.

The scientist's main research topics include advanced control systems optimization, distributed control in multi-agent systems, control systems and identification, microgrid control and optimization, stability and control of uncertain systems, model reduction and neural networks, and gene regulatory network analysis.

Jorge E. Cortes has published extensively in several academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
  • IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology
  • IEEE Control Systems Letters
  • IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems

Their recent papers feature contributions to robotics, control systems, and energy resource management. Selected recent publications are:

  • "Learning Barrier Functions With Memory for Robust Safe Navigation," 2021, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • "Safety-Critical Event Triggered Control via Input-to-State Safe Barrier Functions," 2020, IEEE Control Systems Letters
  • "Frequency Regulation With Heterogeneous Energy Resources: A Realization Using Distributed Control," 2021, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
  • "Control-Barrier-Function-Based Design of Gradient Flows for Constrained Nonlinear Programming," 2023, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
  • "A Nonsmooth Approach to Controller Synthesis for Boolean Specifications," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

Collaborations form an important part of Jorge E. Cortes's research activities. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Parisini, João P. Hespanha, Andrew G. Alleyne, Sònia Martínez, and Miroslav Krstić.

Best Publications

  • European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013

    Michele Baccarani;Michael W. Deininger;Gianantonio Rosti;Andreas Hochhaus

  • Dasatinib in Imatinib-Resistant Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive Leukemias

    Moshe Talpaz;Neil P. Shah;Hagop M Kantarjian;Nicholas Donato

  • A Tyrosine Kinase Created by Fusion of the PDGFRA and FIP1L1 Genes as a Therapeutic Target of Imatinib in Idiopathic Hypereosinophilic Syndrome

    Jan Cools;Jan Cools;Daniel J. DeAngelo;Jason Gotlib;Elizabeth H. Stover

  • Dasatinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.

    Hagop Kantarjian;Neil P. Shah;Andreas Hochhaus;Jorge Cortes

  • Evolving concepts in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet

    Michele Baccarani;Giuseppe Saglio;John Goldman;Andreas Hochhaus

  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: An Update of Concepts and Management Recommendations of European LeukemiaNet

    Michele Baccarani;Jorge Cortes;Fabrizio Pane;Dietger Niederwieser

  • Nilotinib in imatinib-resistant CML and Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL.

    Hagop M Kantarjian;Francis Giles;Lydia Wunderle;Kapil Bhalla

  • Early Results of a Chemoimmunotherapy Regimen of Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab As Initial Therapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

    Michael J. Keating;Susan O'Brien;Maher Albitar;Susan Lerner

  • A Phase 2 Trial of Ponatinib in Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive Leukemias

    Jorge E. Cortes;D. W. Kim;J. Pinilla-Ibarz;P. Le Coutre

  • Phase 1 study of low-dose prolonged exposure schedules of the hypomethylating agent 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine) in hematopoietic malignancies.

    Jean Pierre J. Issa;Guillermo Garcia-Manero;Francis J. Giles;Rajan Mannari

  • Results of a randomized study of 3 schedules of low-dose decitabine in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

    Hagop Kantarjian;Yasuhiro Oki;Guillermo Garcia-Manero;Xuelin Huang

  • Search for new phenomena in final states with an energetic jet and large missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at TeV with the ATLAS detector

    Unknown

  • Results of Treatment With Hyper-CVAD, a Dose-Intensive Regimen, in Adult Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia

    Hagop M Kantarjian;Susan O'Brien;Terry L. Smith;Jorge E Cortes

  • Human chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells are insensitive to imatinib despite inhibition of BCR-ABL activity

    Amie S. Corbin;Amie S. Corbin;Anupriya Agarwal;Marc Loriaux;Jorge Cortes

  • Long-term results of the fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab regimen as initial therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

    Constantine S. Tam;Susan O'Brien;William Wierda;Hagop Kantarjian

  • Ponatinib in Refractory Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive Leukemias

    Jorge E Cortes;Hagop M Kantarjian;Neil P. Shah;Dale Bixby

  • Molecular biology of bcr-abl1-positive chronic myeloid leukemia

    Alfonso Quintás-Cardama;Jorge Cortes

  • Measurement of production with a veto on additional central jet activity in pp collisions at TeV using the ATLAS detector

    Unknown

  • Dasatinib or imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: 2-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION)

    Hagop M. Kantarjian;Neil P. Shah;Jorge E. Cortes;Michele Baccarani

  • The price of drugs for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a reflection of the unsustainable prices of cancer drugs: from the perspective of a large group of CML experts

    Camille Abboud;Ellin Berman;Adam Cohen

Frequent Co-Authors

Hagop M. Kantarjian
Hagop M. Kantarjian The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Farhad Ravandi
Farhad Ravandi The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Guillermo Garcia-Manero
Guillermo Garcia-Manero The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Elias Jabbour
Elias Jabbour The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Susan O'Brien
Susan O'Brien University of California, Irvine
Gautam Borthakur
Gautam Borthakur The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Sherry Pierce
Sherry Pierce The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Srdan Verstovsek
Srdan Verstovsek The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Marina Konopleva
Marina Konopleva The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Naval Daver
Naval Daver The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering alternative pathways in healthcare? Many students explore online nursing programs as a flexible way to advance their careers. One important factor is how much does online nursing school cost—tuition and fees can vary significantly, making affordability a top concern.

Those aiming for leadership or specialized nursing roles may look into online nursing doctoral programs, which can open doors to research and academic positions. Meanwhile, registered nurses seeking career mobility often benefit from affordable rn to bsn programs that expand clinical skills and earning potential.

Non-nurses interested in rapid entry to advanced nursing roles may consider direct entry msn programs online. These programs are designed for career changers and can offer a streamlined route to a master’s degree in nursing.

Each pathway has its own benefits, requirements, and financial considerations. Researching program specifics, eligibility, and costs can help you find the best option to meet your educational and career goals in medicine or nursing.

Best Scientists Citing Jorge E. Cortes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles